Skip to main content

Academic Middle Managers and Management in University Colleges and Universities in Belgium

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 33))

Abstract

This chapter explores facets of managerialism in Flemish policy and institutions of higher education through addressing four questions: (i) What is managerialism and what are its characteristics? (ii) How did the national policymakers make way for managerialism in institutions of higher education? (iii) Are there indicators of managerialism in higher education research of the 1990s? (iv) Do deans, heads of departments and heads of research units perceive the current management of institutions of higher education as having characteristics of managerialism? The empirical research reported in this chapter demonstrates that managerialism is not present in Belgium universities in its extreme forms. A relatively large group of middle managers still prefer a collegial attitude, and they criticise some of the less pleasant consequences of managerialism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amaral, A., Fulton, O., & Larsen, I. M. (2003). A managerial revolution? In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 275–296). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Meek, V. L., & Larsen, I. M. (Eds.). (2003). The higher education managerial revolution? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2001). Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education. Comparative Education, 37(4), 409–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., Vincent, C., & Radnor, H. (1997). Into confusion: LEAs, accountability and democracy. Journal of Education Policy, 12(3), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2004). Education, accountability, and the ethical demand: Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained? Educational Theory, 54(3), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codd, J. (2005). Teachers as ‘managed professionals’ in the global education industry: The New Zealand experience. Educational Review, 57(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, D. (1992). Australian public sector management (2nd ed.). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H. (2003). Who’s afraid of red, yellow and blue? The colourful world of management reforms. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 89–108). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, K., & Verhoeven, J. C. (1999). Flanders (Belgium): Institutional case studies. Leuven: Centre for Sociology of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, K., & Verhoeven, J. C. (2000). Stakeholders in universities and colleges in Flanders. European Journal of Education, 35(4), 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devos, G., Verhoeven, J. C., Maes, S., & Vanpee, K. (2001). Bestuur en medezeggenschap in Vlaamse hogescholen. Leuven/Gent: Departement Sociologie/Vakgroep Management en Organisatie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, O. (2003). Managerialism in UK universities: Unstable hybridity and the complications of implementation. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 155–178). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, D., & Shain, F. (1999). Managing ambiguity: Between markets and managerialism – A case study of ‘middle’ managers in the further education. Sociological Review, 47(3), 461–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (2001). Public management reform and economic and social development. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1(2), 141–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, I. M. (2003). Departmental leadership in Norwegian universities – In between two models of governance? In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 71–88). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. L. (2003). Introduction. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (1999). The cost of managerialism: The implications for the ‘Macdonaldisation’ of higher education in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21(1), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, S. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salminen, A. (2003). New public management and Finnish public sector organisations: The case of universities. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 55–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, R., Carvalho, T., Amaral, A., & Meek, V. L. (2006). Changing patterns in the middle management of higher education institutions: The case of Portugal. Higher Education, 52(2), 215–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunderson, W. (2002). Women, academia and identity: Constructions of equal opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’ – A case of lipstick on the Gorilla? Higher Education Quarterly, 56(4), 376–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (1999). Governance and management in universities: The way we live now. Journal of Education Policy, 14(3), 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simkins, T. (2000). Education reform and managerialism: Comparing the experience of schools and colleges. Journal of Education Policy, 15(3), 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2000). Do league tables contribute to the development of a quality culture? Football and higher education compared. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(1), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Heffen, O., Verhoeven, J. C., & de Wit, K. (1999). Higher education policies and institutional response in Flanders: Instrumental analysis and cultural theory. In B. Jongbloed, P. Maassen, & G. Neave (Eds.), From the eye of the storm: Higher education’s changing institution (pp. 263–293). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, J. C. (2008). Questioning the binary divide: Non-university higher education in Flanders (Belgium). In J. S. Taylor, J. Brites Fereira, M. Machado, & R. Santiago (Eds.), Non-university higher education in Europe (pp. 43–75). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, J. C., Devos, G., Smolders, C., Cools, W., & Velghe, J. (2002). Hogescholen enkele jaren na de fusie. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, J. C., van Petegem, P., & Dom, L. (2000). Tekort aan onderzoekers. Leuven: Departement Sociologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidovich, L., & Slee, R. (2001). Bringing universities to account? Exploring some global and local policy tensions. Journal of Education Policy, 16(5), 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, C. (1996). Quality and education. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author took grateful advantage of the critical comment on the research design and questionnaire by Kurt de Wit (DOWB, KU Leuven) and Leen Dom (KH Mechelen), and is obliged for the professional help of Dirk Heerwegh (CESO, KU Leuven) for the realisation of the web-based survey. The critical reflection of Leo Goedegebuure (University of Melbourne) on the drafts of this chapter was an important moment for reflection and improvement. Many thanks for this support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jef C. Verhoeven .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verhoeven, J.C. (2010). Academic Middle Managers and Management in University Colleges and Universities in Belgium. In: Meek, V., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., Carvalho, T. (eds) The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9163-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics