Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management pp 197–211Cite as

UK Higher Education: Captured by New Managerialist Ideology?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 33))

Abstract

Drawing on the relevant literature and primary data from two large mixed-method research and evaluation projects based at Lancaster University, as well as the author’s other research work (with smaller samples and more qualitative in nature), this chapter (i) identifies new managerialism as fundamentally ideological in nature; (ii) positions the very significant role of discourse in articulating and sustaining ideologies; (iii) asks whether new managerialist ideology and discourse have become hegemonic in UK higher education, exploring the reasons for any dominance they have achieved; and (iv) concludes with the observation that UK higher education has not been ‘captured’ by this ideology despite its apparent prevalence.

At the heart of ideology is the problem of social relations of domination made intelligible through discourse … ideology is understood, perpetuated or challenged through discourse.

(Leonardo, 2003, pp. 204, 207)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ball, S. J. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. (1995). Total quality management in the academy: A rebellious reading. Harvard Educational Review, 65(4), 593–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. (2002). Explaining change in higher education policy. In P. Trowler (Ed.), Higher education policy and institutional change (pp. 24–45). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S., & McLaughlin, E. (2000). New managerialism, new welfare? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state: Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (CVCP). (1985). Report of the steering committee for efficiency studies in universities (The Jarrett report). London: CVCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (1998). ‘New Managerialism’ and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2003). Managing to exclude? Manager-academic and staff communities in contemporary UK universities. In M. Tight (Ed.), International perspectives on higher education research: Access and inclusion (pp. 103–125). Oxford: Elsevier Science JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2004). The knowledge worker, the manager-academic and the contemporary UK university: New and old forms of public management? Financial Accountability and Management, 20(2), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., & Brehony, K. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘New Managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money and Management, 14(3), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, L. (2000). The UK research assessment exercise: Unintended consequences. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(3), 274–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairley, J., & Patterson, L. (1995). Scottish education and the new managerialism. Scottish Educational Review, 27(1), 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielden, J., & Lockwood, G. (1973). Planning and management in universities. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, J. (1993). Power plays, power works. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1981). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, O. (2003). Managerialism in UK universities: Unstable hybridity and the complications of implementation. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 155–178). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, P. J., Hulland, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of new capitalism. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, S., Ball, S., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D., Keenoy, T., & Oswick, C. (1998). Organizational discourse: Of diversity, dichotomy and multidisciplinarity. In D. Grant, T. Keenoy, & C. Oswick (Eds.), Discourse and organization (pp. 1–14). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1992). Contrived collegiality: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. In N. Bennett, M. Crawford, & C. Riches (Eds.), Managing change in education: Individual and organizational perspectives (pp. 80–94). London: PCP/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, D. (1983). Ideology and organizational behaviour. International Studies of Management and Organization, 13(3), 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1995). Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm? Public Policy and Administration, 10(2), 104–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., & Scott, C. (1996). Bureaucratic regulation and new public management in the United Kingdom: Mirror-image developments? Journal of Law and Society, 23(3), 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jary, D., & Parker, M. (1998). The new higher education: Issues and directions for the post-Dearing university. Stoke on Trent: Staffordshire University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A. (1995). The impact of the research assessment exercises on teaching in selected geography departments in England and Wales. Geography, 84(4), 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2001). Resources in the management of change in higher education. In P. Trowler (Ed.), Higher education policy and institutional change: Intentions and outcomes in turbulent environments (pp. 79–107). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., & Deem, R. (2003). Talking of students: Tensions and contradictions for the manager-academic and the university in contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 46(3), 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, I., & Lucio, M. (1995). The politics of quality in the public sector: The management of change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J., & Bartlett, W. (Eds.). (1993). Quasi-markets and social policy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardo, Z. (2003). Discourse and critique: Outlines of a post-structural theory of ideology. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNay, I. (1997). The impact of the 1992 research assessment exercise on individual and institutional behaviour in English higher education. London: HEFCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1968). Social structure and anomie. In R. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (pp. 185–214). New York: New York Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (Ed.). (1993). Leading academics. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H., with Meyenn, R. (1998). Academic managers: Bosses or colleagues? Paper presented at the International Sociology Of Education Conference, Sheffield, UK, 2–4 January, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, G. C., & Eustace, R. (1974). Power and authority in British universities. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M., & Jary, D. (1995). The McUniversity: Organization, management and academic subjectivity. Organization, 2(2), 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, F. (1972). Class inequality and political order. St Albans: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, G. (2001). Reform of higher education in the United Kingdom. In B. Nolan (Ed.), Public sector reform: An international perspective (pp. 117–132). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (1993). Managerialism and the public services: Cuts or cultural change in the 1990s? Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (1999). Performance or compliance? Performance audit and public management in five countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prichard, C. (2000). Making managers in universities and colleges. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randle, K., & Brady, N. (1997). Managerialism and professionalism in the ‘Cinderella Service’. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 49(1), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (1993). The McDonaldization of society. Newbury Park, CA: Pine Forge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, F. E. (1966). The managerial revolution in higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Webster, F. (Eds.). (1997). The Postmodern University? Contested visions of higher education in society. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Startup, R. (1976). The role of the departmental head. Studies in Higher Education, 1(2), 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. 1967 (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Norton Library and Harper & Row, 1967. Retrieved 13 February, 2007, from http://www.eldritchpress.org/fwt/ti.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1993). Managerialism and the academic profession: The case of England. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (1998). Academics responding to change: New higher education frameworks and academic cultures. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (2001). Captured by the discourse? The socially constitutive power of new higher education discourse in the UK. Organization, 8(2), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P., & Knight, P. (2001). Exploring the implementation gap: Theory and practices in change interventions. In P. Trowler (Ed.), Higher education policy and institutional change (pp. 142–163). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Knight, P. (2003). Change thinking, change practices: A guide to change for heads of department, programme leaders and other change agents in higher education. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network, Generic Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (1993). Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 515–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (1995). Managing the academics: Commodification and control in the development of university education in the UK. Human Relations, 48(9), 993–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama, K. (2006). The effect of the research assessment exercise on organizational culture in English universities: Collegiality versus managerialism. Tertiary Education Management, 12(4), 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

    Paul Trowler

Authors
  1. Paul Trowler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Trowler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. LH Martin Institute for Higher Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia

    V. Lynn Meek

  2. LH Martin Institute for Higher Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia

    Leo Goedegebuure

  3. Ensino Superior (CIPES), Centro de Investigação de Politicas do, Rua 1 de Dezembro 399, Matosinhos, 4450, Portugal

    Rui Santiago

  4. Ensino Superior (CIPES), Centro de Investigação de Politicas do, Rua 1 de Dezembro 399, Matosinhos, 4450, Portugal

    Teresa Carvalho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trowler, P. (2010). UK Higher Education: Captured by New Managerialist Ideology?. In: Meek, V., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., Carvalho, T. (eds) The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9163-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation