Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 33))

Abstract

This chapter provides a theoretical framework for the comparative analysis of changes to the middle management of higher education. The chapter reviews the literature on the deanship as an object of scholarly analysis and the rise of New Public Management and managerialism in higher education. This discussion is set within the broader context of the higher education reform agenda that is taking place across all OECD nations. The chapter poses a number of broad heuristic questions that are addressed by the country-specific studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altbach, P. G. (Ed.). (1996). The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Jones, G. A., & Karseth, B. (Eds.). (2002). Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Meek, V. L., & Larsen, I. M. (Eds.). (2003). The higher education managerial revolution? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J. (2003). From blaming the middle to harnessing its potential: Creating change intermediaries. British Journal of Management, 14(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J., & Gerry, J. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 523–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1989). The cybernetic institution: Towards an integration of governance theories. Higher Education, 18(4), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2007). Effective leadership in higher education: A literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 693–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state: Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H., Goedegebuure, L., van der Lee, J., & Meek, V. L. (2008). The Australian academic profession: A first overview. RIHE International Seminar Reports, 12, 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M. (2001). APSA presidential address 2000. The tragedy of the common-rooms? Political science and the New University Governance. Australian Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., Deangelis, R., De Boer, H., Huisman, J., & Lacotte, C. (2003). Globalizing practices and university responses: European and Anglo-American differences. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘New Managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2): 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. (2001). Between state control and academic capitalism: A comparative perspective on academic staff in Europe. In J. Enders (Ed.), Academic staff in Europe: Changing contexts and conditions (pp. 1–23). London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1997). A victim of their own success? Employment and working conditions of academic staff in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 34(3), 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurydice. (2008). Higher education governance in Europe: Policies, structures, funding and academic staff. Brussels: Eurydice.

    Google Scholar 

  • File, J., & Goedegebuure, L. (Eds.). (2003). Real-time systems: Reflections on higher education in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia. Brno: Vutium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedegebuure, L., Coates, H., van der Lee, J., & Meek, V. L. (2009). Diversity in Australian higher education: An empirical analysis. Australian Universities Review, 51(2): 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, C. (1983). Efficiency and related rules for organizational action. International Studies of Management and Organization, 13(3): 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamensky, J. (1996). Role of reinventing government movement in federal management reform. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. S., & Shand, D. A. (1998). Public management reform and economic and social development. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. L. (2003). Introduction. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2009). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1971). The strange case of academic organization. Journal of Higher Education, 42(6), 486–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (1993). Managerialism and the public services: Cuts or cultural change in the 1990s? Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2003). The essential public manager. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. (2002). New managerialism, professional power and organisational governance in UK universities: A review and assessment. In A. Amaral, G. A. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (pp. 163–186). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Institute for Higher Education (RIHE). (2008). The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective and quantitative perspectives. Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2006). Good governance in higher education. London: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2003). The future of higher education and the future of higher education research. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(3), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1994). Managerialism and the academic profession: The case of England. Higher Education Policy, 7(2), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (1998). Academics responding to change: New higher education frameworks and academic cultures. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Lynn Meek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meek, V.L., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., Carvalho, T. (2010). Introduction. In: Meek, V., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., Carvalho, T. (eds) The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9163-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics