Skip to main content

Implementation of a Curriculum Management System at a Faculty of Medicine – Lessons Learned from a Pilot Project

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technological Developments in Networking, Education and Automation

Abstract

Integration of electronic curricula remains highly variable among medical schools in North America. A major challenge has been availability and implementation of an ideal curriculum management software system (CMS). The objective of this study was to test the feasibility of using a CMS system at the University of Manitoba (U of M). At the U of M, we implemented a multi-user software system designed to provide faculty and students with an integrated curriculum, scheduling, calendar functionality, and communication tools. The goals of the pilot project were to explore the feasibility of an electronic curriculum and to evaluate strengths and weaknesses of the software. One block each from the 1st and the 2nd year medical school class were chosen for the pilot project. Data were collected through student and faculty surveys, student and faculty login-ins, student page views, and through direct communication with various users. Most students (100%) and faculty (78%) indicated a strong need for an electronic CMS. A statistically significant increase in student log-ins (p<0.01) and page views (p<0.05) occurred from week 1 to week 6 and then reached a plateau, whereas faculty log-ins remained constant. The 1st year and 2nd year medical classes were dissatisfied (34% and 57%), neutral (24% and 25%), or satisfied (42% and 18%) with the CMS, respectively. This pilot project demonstrated that an electronic CMS was feasible at the U of M. In addition, we learned how to effectively implement such a system, and how to encourage faculty and students to adopt the system. The lessons learned at U of M may be instructive for other faculties attempting to deploy electronic curriculum for undergraduate medical education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Effective use of educational technology in medical education. AAMC 2007. https://aamc.org/ Accessed on August 8, 2008.

  2. D. Sandham, A. Paul, S. Sharma. Integration of e-curriculum into medical education. Gravitas 2008; 41:4-5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Educating doctors to provide high quality medical care - a vision for medical education in the United States. AAMC 2004. https://aamc.org/ Accessed on August 8, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Barzansky, S.I. Etzel. Educational programs in US medical schools, 2002-2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.B. Slotnick. How doctors learn: education and leaning across the medical-school-to- practice trajectory. Acad med 2001; 76: 1013-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J.P. Ward, J. Gordon, M.J. Field, H.P. Lehmann. Communication and information technology in medical education. The Lancet. 2001; 357:792–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Devitt, E. Palmer. Computer-aided learning: an overvalued educational resource? Med Edu 1999; 33:136-139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Greenhalgh. Computer-assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ. 2001; 322:40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C.L. Friend, C.L. Cole. Learner control in computer-based instruction: a current literature review. Ed Tech. 1990; November: 47–40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.J. Steele, J.E.J. Palensky, T.G. Lynch, N.L. Lacy, S.W. Duffy. Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and student evaluation of computerized instruction. Med Educ. 2002; 36:225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C.J. Bland, S. Starnaman, L.Wersal, L. Moorhead-Rosenberg, et al. Curricular change in medical schools: how to succeed. Acad Med 2000; 75:575–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Vogel, D.F. Wood. Love it or hate it? Medical students’ attitudes to computer-aided learning. Med Educ. 2002; 36:214–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M.L. Rice, E.K. Wilson, W. Bagley. Transforming learning with technology: lessons from the field. J Tech Teacher Educ 2001; 9(2):211–30.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B.M. Karnath, W. Thornton, M. DasCarlos. Pilot study of computer-based self-teaching in cardiac auscultation. Med Educ. 2003; 37:1048–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A.J. Lipman, R.M. Sade, A.C. Glotzbach, C.J. Lancaster, M.F. Marshell. The incremental value of internet-based instruction as an adjunct to clasroom instruction: a propsective randomized study. Acad Med. 2001; 76:1060–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B.L. Ingerman. Form follows function: establishing the necessary infrastructure. In: Barone CA, Hagner PR, eds. Technology-enhanced teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Daniel. Computer-Aided Instruction on the World Wide Web: The Third Generation. J of Econ Ed. 1999. pp. 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Chodorow. Educators must take the electronic revolution seriously. Acad Med. 1996; 71:221–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H.K. Muhsin. The use of e-learning techniques to improve the medical education. ICTTA 2008. http://ieexplore.ieee.org/ Accessed on August 2008.

  20. R.M. Palloff, K. Pratt. Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: the realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H.S. Wentzer. Technology development and implementation in the public health institutions and pedagogical task for the learning organization. Stud Health Tech Informatics 2000; 77:264–70.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Broudo, C. Walsh. MEDICOL: online learning in medicine and dentistry. Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):926-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J.D. Hoban, J.B. Schlesinger, R.P. Fairman, M.M. Grimes. Electrifying a medical school course: a case study. Teach Learn Med. 2003 Spring;15(2):140-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Gotthardt, M.J. Siegert, A. Schlieck, S. Schneider, A. Kohnert, M.W. Gross, et al. How to successfully implement e-learning for both students and teachers. Acad Radiol. 2006 Mar; 13(3):379-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. W.D. Hendricson, F. Panagakos, E. Eisenberg, J. McDonald, G. Guest, P. Jones, et al. Electronic curriculum implementation at North American dental schools. J Dent Educ. 2004 Oct; 68(10):1041-57.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.B. Riley, J.W. Austin, D.W. Holt, B.E. Searles, E.M. Darling. Internet-based virtual classroom and educational management software enhance students’ didactic and clinical experiences in perfusion education programs. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2004 Sep; 36(3):235-9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. X. Gómez-Arbonés, A. Ferreira, M. Piqué, J. Roca, J. Tomás, J.L. Frutos, et al. A cardiological web as an adjunct to medical teaching: prospective analysis. Medical Teacher 2004; 26:187-191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. B.P. Kerfoot, H. Baker, T.L. Jackson, W.C. Hulbert, D.D. Federman, R.D. Oates, et al. A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial of adjuvant web-based teaching to medical students. Acad Med. 2006 Mar; 81(3):224-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D.M. Fleiszer, N.H. Posel. Development of an undergraduate medical curriculum: the McGill experience. Acad Med. 2003 Mar; 78(3):265-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Schultze-Mosgau, T. Zielinski, J. Lochner. Web-based, virtual course units as a didactic concept for medical teaching. Med Teach. 2004 Jun; 26(4):336-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J.G. Ruiz, M.J. Mintzer, R.M. Leipzig. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006: 81:207-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. K. Masters, T. Gibbs. The spiral curriculum: implications for online learning. BMC Med Educ. 2007 Dec 21; 7:52-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge and thank class of 2011 students, Blocks III and VI instructors and administrative staff of Undergraduate Medical Education Office (Pat McCullough, Pre-Clerkship Program Administrator; Mark Torchia, Med I Coordinator; and Vieanna Beck, Administrative Assistant) at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba for their superb enthusiasm and terrific support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aarti Paul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paul, A., Yaworski, D., McConnell, K., Martin, B., Sandham, D., Sharma, S. (2010). Implementation of a Curriculum Management System at a Faculty of Medicine – Lessons Learned from a Pilot Project. In: Elleithy, K., Sobh, T., Iskander, M., Kapila, V., Karim, M., Mahmood, A. (eds) Technological Developments in Networking, Education and Automation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9151-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9151-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9150-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9151-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics