Skip to main content

Faculty Driven Assessment of Critical Thinking: National Dissemination of the CAT Instrument

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Technological Developments in Networking, Education and Automation

Abstract

This paper reports the latest findings of a project to nationally disseminate the CAT© instrument, a unique interdisciplinary assessment tool for evaluating students’ critical thinking skills. Tennessee Technological University originally partnered with six other institutions across the U.S. to evaluate and refine the CAT instrument beginning in 2004. Through these efforts a test with high face validity, high construct validity, high reliability, and that is culturally fair was developed In the current national dissemination project, we are collaborating with over 40 institutions across the country to disseminate this unique instrument and support the creation of assessment based efforts to improve student learning. These dissemination efforts involved training representatives from other institutions to lead scoring workshops on their own campuses as part of a broader effort to improve student learning. A variety of findings indicate these dissemination efforts are successful. National user norms that are being collected from this project indicate that largest gains in undergraduate critical thinking appear to occur in the junior and senior years. 1

1 Partial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation’s CCLI Program under grants 0404911 and 0717654. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations During the 2006-2007 Accreditation Cycle. Baltimore, MD: Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bok, Our Underachieving Colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. The NPEC Sourcebook on Assessment, Volume 1: Definitions and Assessment Methods for Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Writing, NCES 2000—172, prepared by T. Dary Erwin for the Council of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Student Outcomes Pilot Working Group: Cognitive and Intellectual Development. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Bransford, A. Brown, and R. Cocking, (Eds.) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Pellegrino, N. Chudowski, and R. Glaser (Eds.) Knowing What Students Know. Washington, D.C., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Stein, A. Haynes, and M. Redding. “Project CAT: Assessing Critical Thinking Skills”, in Proceedings of the National STEM Assessment Conference, D. Deeds and B. Callen , Eds. NSF, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Ewell. “The examined life: Assessment and the ends of general education”, Association of American Colleges & Universities General Education and Assessment Conference, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Stein, A. Haynes, M. Redding, T. Ennis, and M. Cecil. “Assessing Critical Thinking in STEM and Beyond”, in Innovations in E-learning, Instruction Technology, Assessment, and Engineering Education, M. Iskander, Ed. Springer, 2007, pp.79-82.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Stein, A. Haynes, and K. Harris. “Assessing and Improving Critical Thinking Using the CAT Instrument”, ABET Best Assessment Processes Symposium XI. Indianapolis, IN: Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Cecil, “The Relationship Between Student Responses on the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and Performance of the Critical-Thinking Assessment Test (CAT)”, Dissertation, Tennessee Technological University, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stein, B., Haynes, A., Redding, M., Harris, K., Tylka, M., Lisic, E. (2010). Faculty Driven Assessment of Critical Thinking: National Dissemination of the CAT Instrument. In: Elleithy, K., Sobh, T., Iskander, M., Kapila, V., Karim, M., Mahmood, A. (eds) Technological Developments in Networking, Education and Automation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9151-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9151-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9150-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9151-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics