Skip to main content

Effects of New Governance on Research in the Humanities – The Example of Medieval History

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance and Performance in the German Public Research Sector

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 32))

Abstract

The first section in the chapter presents the main lines of the discussion on the role of the humanities in the current research landscape and discusses the common assumptions which claim that new governance approaches put research in the humanities at a disadvantage and that they lead to their gradual reduction or cut back. The second section draws on longitudinal statistical data to verify whether the quota of external research funds in the humanities has decreased and whether the number of research posts was reduced. This analysis is conducted comparatively for four countries (D, A, NL, UK). As a case study of a specific subject within the humanities, the third section presents findings from interviews with researchers in medieval history. The interviews were conducted in the four countries mentioned above and focused on the question whether and how far new university management/governance approaches within universities affect the actual research activities of individual historians and how the researchers perceive the changes in their institutional environment. The concluding section discusses whether university management can really determine research activities in a top-down manner, which strategies of avoidance or adaptation researchers possibly develop and if perhaps supranational (EU) research policies and rationales play a role for the researchers’ strategies.

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9139-0_7

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The analysis, including the interviews, was concentrated exclusively on England , i.e. not including Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Therefore, England is used throughout the text to indicate the geographical focus, while United Kingdom is used in the text to designate reforms , trends and developments that apply to the whole of the country.

  2. 2.

    The project is part of a DFG-funded larger research group established in 2003 on the international competitiveness and innovative capacities of universities and research organisations (cf. Jansen 2007) and focuses on a comparison of decision-making processes and their effects on research in managerial and collegial forms of university governance in Austria , England , Germany and the Netherlands using biotechnology and medieval history as case studies (cf. Kehm and Lanzendorf 2006; 2007; as well as Leiðytë 2007).

References

  • AHRB – Arts and Humanities Research Board. (2002). Annual Report 2001/02. Bristol: AHRB.

    Google Scholar 

  • AHRC – Arts and Humanities Research Council. (2007). Annual Report 2006/07. Bristol: AHRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (1998). Jahresbericht 1998. Bonn: Lemmens Medien GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2002). Jahresbericht 2002. Bonn: Lemmens Medien GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2006). Jahresbericht 2006. Bonn: Lemmens Medien GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daxner, M. (1986). Die Rettung der Geisteswissenschaften durch die Westdeutsche Rektorenkonferenz. In D. Daxner, B.M. Kehm (Eds.), Hochschulen auf dem rechten Weg (pp. 99–112). Bochum: Germinal.

    Google Scholar 

  • FWF – Fond zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung. (2000). Jahresbericht 2000. Vienna: FWF.

    Google Scholar 

  • FWF – Fond zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung. (2003). Jahresbericht 2003. Vienna: FWF.

    Google Scholar 

  • FWF – Fond zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung. (2005). FWF Statistik 2005. Vienna: FWF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Nowotny, H., Limoges, C. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, H.-W., Jarnut, J. (2003). Mediävistik im 21. Jahrhundert. München: W. Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (1996). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1994/95. Cheltenham: HESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (1997). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1995/96. Cheltenham: HESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (1998). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1996/97. Cheltenham: HESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (1999). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1997/98. Cheltenham: HESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2000). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1998/99. Cheltenham: HESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2001). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1999/2000. Cheltenham: HESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2002). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 2000/01. Cheltenham: HESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2003). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 2001/02. Cheltenham: HESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2005). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 2003/04. Cheltenham: HESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2007). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 2005/06. Cheltenham: HESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, S., Muller-Camen, M., Collin, A. (2004). From Academic Communities to Managed Organisations: The Implications for Academic Careers in UK and German Universities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2000). Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, D. (Ed.). (2007). New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations. Disciplinary Approaches, Interfaces and Integration. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B.M., Lanzendorf, U. (Eds.). (2006). Reforming University Governance – Changing Conditions for Research in Four European Countries. Bonn: Lemmens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B.M., Lanzendorf, U. (2007). Impacts of University Management on Academic Work: Reform Experiences in Austria and Germany. Management Revue, 18(2), 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keisinger, F., Seischab, S. (Eds.). (2003). Wozu Geisteswissenschaften? Kontroverse Argumente für eine überfällige Debatte. Frankfurt/M, New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzendorf, U. (2008). Technik über alles – Ist eine ausgewogene Forschung noch möglich? In R. Herwig, J. Uhlig, J. Küstner (Eds.), Wissen als Begleiter!? Das Individuum als lebenslanger Lerner. Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiðytë, L. (2007). University Governance and Academic Research. Case Studies of Research Units in Dutch and English Universities. Enschede: CHEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (Ed.). (2006). Im Gespräch: Probleme und Perspektiven der Geisteswissenschaften. München: Vögel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, F., Schimank, U. (2004). Neue Steuerungsmuster an den Universitäten: Mögliche Folgen für die geisteswissenschaftliche Forschung. In D. Kimmich, A. Thumfart (Eds.), Universität ohne Zukunft? (pp. 97–123). Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • NWO – Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. (2002). Financieel Jaarverslag 2002. The Hague: NWO.

    Google Scholar 

  • NWO – Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. (2003). Financieel Jaarverslag 2003. The Hague: NWO.

    Google Scholar 

  • NWO – Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. (2004). Financieel Jaarverslag 2004. The Hague: NWO.

    Google Scholar 

  • NWO – Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. (2005). NOW Annual Report 2005. The Hague: NWO.

    Google Scholar 

  • NWO – Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. (2006). NOW Annual Report 2006. The Hague: NWO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistik Austria. (1998). Erhebung über Forschung und experimentelle Entwicklung 1998. http://www.statistik.at. Accessed 13 May 2009.

  • Statistik Austria. (2004). Erhebung über Forschung und experimentelle Entwicklung 2004. http://www.statistik.at. Accessed 13 May 2009.

  • Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. (1997). Personal an Hochschulen. Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.4. 1997. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. (2006). Personal an Hochschulen. Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.4. 2006. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland.

    Google Scholar 

  • VSNU. (2008). Wetenschappelijk Onderwijs PersoneelsInformatie – WOPI 1999–2006. http://www.vsnu.nl/Universiteiten/Feiten-Cijfers/Personeel.htm. Accessed 13 May 2008.

  • Wainwright, M. (2005). Hoodies from the Past Prove that Teenage Angst is Nothing New. The Guardian, 7 June 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara M. Kehm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kehm, B.M., Leiðytë, L. (2010). Effects of New Governance on Research in the Humanities – The Example of Medieval History . In: Jansen, D. (eds) Governance and Performance in the German Public Research Sector. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9139-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics