Abstract
The first section in the chapter presents the main lines of the discussion on the role of the humanities in the current research landscape and discusses the common assumptions which claim that new governance approaches put research in the humanities at a disadvantage and that they lead to their gradual reduction or cut back. The second section draws on longitudinal statistical data to verify whether the quota of external research funds in the humanities has decreased and whether the number of research posts was reduced. This analysis is conducted comparatively for four countries (D, A, NL, UK). As a case study of a specific subject within the humanities, the third section presents findings from interviews with researchers in medieval history. The interviews were conducted in the four countries mentioned above and focused on the question whether and how far new university management/governance approaches within universities affect the actual research activities of individual historians and how the researchers perceive the changes in their institutional environment. The concluding section discusses whether university management can really determine research activities in a top-down manner, which strategies of avoidance or adaptation researchers possibly develop and if perhaps supranational (EU) research policies and rationales play a role for the researchers’ strategies.
An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9139-0_7
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The analysis, including the interviews, was concentrated exclusively on England , i.e. not including Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Therefore, England is used throughout the text to indicate the geographical focus, while United Kingdom is used in the text to designate reforms , trends and developments that apply to the whole of the country.
- 2.
The project is part of a DFG-funded larger research group established in 2003 on the international competitiveness and innovative capacities of universities and research organisations (cf. Jansen 2007) and focuses on a comparison of decision-making processes and their effects on research in managerial and collegial forms of university governance in Austria , England , Germany and the Netherlands using biotechnology and medieval history as case studies (cf. Kehm and Lanzendorf 2006; 2007; as well as Leiðytë 2007).
References
AHRB – Arts and Humanities Research Board. (2002). Annual Report 2001/02. Bristol: AHRB.
AHRC – Arts and Humanities Research Council. (2007). Annual Report 2006/07. Bristol: AHRC.
DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (1998). Jahresbericht 1998. Bonn: Lemmens Medien GmbH.
DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2002). Jahresbericht 2002. Bonn: Lemmens Medien GmbH.
DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2006). Jahresbericht 2006. Bonn: Lemmens Medien GmbH.
Daxner, M. (1986). Die Rettung der Geisteswissenschaften durch die Westdeutsche Rektorenkonferenz. In D. Daxner, B.M. Kehm (Eds.), Hochschulen auf dem rechten Weg (pp. 99–112). Bochum: Germinal.
FWF – Fond zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung. (2000). Jahresbericht 2000. Vienna: FWF.
FWF – Fond zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung. (2003). Jahresbericht 2003. Vienna: FWF.
FWF – Fond zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung. (2005). FWF Statistik 2005. Vienna: FWF.
Gibbons, M., Nowotny, H., Limoges, C. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
Goetz, H.-W., Jarnut, J. (2003). Mediävistik im 21. Jahrhundert. München: W. Fink.
HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (1996). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1994/95. Cheltenham: HESA.
HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (1997). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1995/96. Cheltenham: HESA.
HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (1998). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1996/97. Cheltenham: HESA.
HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (1999). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1997/98. Cheltenham: HESA.
HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2000). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1998/99. Cheltenham: HESA.
HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2001). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 1999/2000. Cheltenham: HESA.
HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2002). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 2000/01. Cheltenham: HESA.
HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2003). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 2001/02. Cheltenham: HESA.
HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2005). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 2003/04. Cheltenham: HESA.
HESA – Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2007). Resources of Higher Education Institutions 2005/06. Cheltenham: HESA.
Harley, S., Muller-Camen, M., Collin, A. (2004). From Academic Communities to Managed Organisations: The Implications for Academic Careers in UK and German Universities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 329–345.
Henkel, M. (2000). Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
Jansen, D. (Ed.). (2007). New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations. Disciplinary Approaches, Interfaces and Integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kehm, B.M., Lanzendorf, U. (Eds.). (2006). Reforming University Governance – Changing Conditions for Research in Four European Countries. Bonn: Lemmens.
Kehm, B.M., Lanzendorf, U. (2007). Impacts of University Management on Academic Work: Reform Experiences in Austria and Germany. Management Revue, 18(2), 153–173.
Keisinger, F., Seischab, S. (Eds.). (2003). Wozu Geisteswissenschaften? Kontroverse Argumente für eine überfällige Debatte. Frankfurt/M, New York: Campus.
Lanzendorf, U. (2008). Technik über alles – Ist eine ausgewogene Forschung noch möglich? In R. Herwig, J. Uhlig, J. Küstner (Eds.), Wissen als Begleiter!? Das Individuum als lebenslanger Lerner. Münster: LIT Verlag.
Leiðytë, L. (2007). University Governance and Academic Research. Case Studies of Research Units in Dutch and English Universities. Enschede: CHEPS.
Malinowski, B. (Ed.). (2006). Im Gespräch: Probleme und Perspektiven der Geisteswissenschaften. München: Vögel.
Meier, F., Schimank, U. (2004). Neue Steuerungsmuster an den Universitäten: Mögliche Folgen für die geisteswissenschaftliche Forschung. In D. Kimmich, A. Thumfart (Eds.), Universität ohne Zukunft? (pp. 97–123). Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
NWO – Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. (2002). Financieel Jaarverslag 2002. The Hague: NWO.
NWO – Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. (2003). Financieel Jaarverslag 2003. The Hague: NWO.
NWO – Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. (2004). Financieel Jaarverslag 2004. The Hague: NWO.
NWO – Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. (2005). NOW Annual Report 2005. The Hague: NWO.
NWO – Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. (2006). NOW Annual Report 2006. The Hague: NWO.
Statistik Austria. (1998). Erhebung über Forschung und experimentelle Entwicklung 1998. http://www.statistik.at. Accessed 13 May 2009.
Statistik Austria. (2004). Erhebung über Forschung und experimentelle Entwicklung 2004. http://www.statistik.at. Accessed 13 May 2009.
Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. (1997). Personal an Hochschulen. Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.4. 1997. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland.
Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. (2006). Personal an Hochschulen. Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.4. 2006. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland.
VSNU. (2008). Wetenschappelijk Onderwijs PersoneelsInformatie – WOPI 1999–2006. http://www.vsnu.nl/Universiteiten/Feiten-Cijfers/Personeel.htm. Accessed 13 May 2008.
Wainwright, M. (2005). Hoodies from the Past Prove that Teenage Angst is Nothing New. The Guardian, 7 June 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kehm, B.M., Leiðytë, L. (2010). Effects of New Governance on Research in the Humanities – The Example of Medieval History . In: Jansen, D. (eds) Governance and Performance in the German Public Research Sector. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9139-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9139-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9138-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9139-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)