Skip to main content

Weeds, Worms and Geostatistics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geostatistical Applications for Precision Agriculture

Abstract

Weeds and plant-parasitic nematodes occur in patches in agricultural fields. Farmers can control them with chemicals. They can do so precisely and prevent competition (from weeds) and predation (by nematodes) provided they know where the pests are early in the lives of their crops or before sowing or planting them. Standard geostatistical methods have been used successfully to analyse counts of both weed seedlings and nematodes in the soil and to map their distributions from kriged estimates. The application is technologically sound. The most serious obstacle to its application in farming is that sampling must be intense, with spacings between sampling points of 20–40 m. This means that the cost of sampling and counting the pests is greater than the savings from not applying herbicides or nematicides. Only for potatoes is the effort and cost of estimating the burdens of the parasitic cyst nematodes of the genusGlobodera justified economically. For precise control of weeds proximal sensing at the seedling stage seems more promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anscombe, F. J. (1950). Soil sampling for potato root eel worm cysts.Annals of Applied Biology,37, 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avendaño, F., Pierce, F. J., & Melakeberhan, H. (2004). Spatial analysis of soybean yield in relation to soil texture, soil fertility and soybean cyst nematode.Nematology,6, 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardina, J., Sparrow, D. H., & McCoy, E. L. (1995). Analysis of spatial distribution of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till soybean (Glycine max).Weed Science,43, 258–268.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cousens, R. D., Brown, R. W., McBratney, A. B., Whelan, B., & Moerkerk, M. (2002). Sampling strategy is important for producing weed maps: A case study using kriging.Weed Science,50, 542–546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. A. C. (1993).Statistics for spatial data, revised edition. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, W. W. (1994). Geostatistics for mapping weeds, with a Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) patch as a case study.Weed Science,42, 648–657.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K., Webster, R. M., Halford, P. D., Barker, A. D., & Russell, M. D. (2002). Site-specific management of nematodes – pitfalls and practicalities.Journal of Nematology,34, 194–199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K., Webster, R., Barker, A., Halford, P, Russell, M., Stafford, J., & Griffin, S. (2003). Mapping infestations of potato cyst nematodes and the potential for spatially varying application of nematicides.Precision Agriculture,4, 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farias, P. R. S., Sánchez-Vila, X., Barbosa, J. C., Vieira, S. R., Ferraz, L. C. C. B., & Solís-Delfin, J. (2002). Using geostatistical analysis to evaluate the presence ofRotylenchulus reniformis in cotton crops in Brazil: economic implications.Journal of Nematology,34, 232–238.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhards, R., & Oebel, H. (2006). Practical experiences with a system for site specific weed control in arable crops using real-time image analysis and GPS-controlled patch spraying.Weed Research,43, 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts, P. (1997).Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillot, G., Lorén, N., & Rudemo, M. (2009). Spatial prediction of weed intensities from exact count data and image-based estimates.Applied Statistics,58, 525–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisel, T., Andreasen, C., & Ersbøll, A. E. (1996). Annual weed distributions can be mapped with kriging.Weed Research,36, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisel, T., Ersbøll, A. E., & Andreasen, C. (1999). Weed mapping with co-kriging using soil properties.Precision Agriculture,1, 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. A., Mortensen, D. A., & Gotway, C. A. (1996). Spatial and temporal analysis of weed seedling populations using geostatistics.Weed Science,44, 704–710.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jurado-Expósito, M., López-Granados, F., García-Torres, L., García-Ferrer, A., Sánchez de la Orden, M., & Atenciano, S. (2003). Multi-species weed spatial variability and site-specific management maps in cultivated sunflower.Weed Science,51, 319–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutman, P. J. W., & Miller, P. C. H. (2007).Spatially variable herbicide application technology: Opportunities for herbicide minimisation and protection of beneficial weeds. Research Review No 62. London: Home-Grown Cereals Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rew, L. J., Whelan, B., & McBratney, A. B. (2001). Does kriging predict weed distributions accurately enough for site-specific weed control?Weed Research,41, 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, J.-P., Delaville, L., & Quénéhervé, P. (1996). Microspatial structure of a plant-parasitic nematode community in a sugarcane field in Martinique.Applied Soil Ecology,3, 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seinhorst, J. W. (1982). The distribution of cysts ofGlobodera rostochiensis in small plots and the resulting sampling errors.Nematologica,23, 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. R. (1984). Assessing and interpreting the spatial distribution of insect populations.Annual Review of Entomology,29, 321–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. K., & Hawkins, D. M. (1994). Applications of geostatistics in plant nematology.Journal of Nematology,26, 626–634.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. K., Rust, R. H., Hawkins, D. M., & MacDonald, D. H. (1993). Correlation of edaphic factors with plant-parasitic nematode population densities in a forage field.Journal of Nematology,25, 642–653.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A. M., Christensen, S., & Simmelsgaard, S. E. (2002). Spatial correlation between weed species densities and soil properties.Weed Research,42, 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R., & Boag, B. (1992). A geostatistical analysis of cyst nematodes in soil.Journal of Soil Science,43, 583–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R., & Oliver, M. A. (2007).Geostatistics for environmental scientists (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R., Welham, S. J., Potts, J. M., & Oliver, M. A. (2006). Estimating the spatial scales of regionalized variable by nested sampling, hierarchical analysis of variance and residual maximum likelihood.Computers & Geosciences,32, 1320–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyse-Pester, D. Y., Wiles, L. J., & Westra, P. (2002). The potential for mapping nematode distributions for site-specific management.Journal of Nematology,34, 80–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Youden, W. J., & Mehlich, A. (1937). Selection of efficient methods for soil sampling.Contributions of the Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research,9, 59–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Webster .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Webster, R. (2010). Weeds, Worms and Geostatistics. In: Oliver, M. (eds) Geostatistical Applications for Precision Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9133-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics