Skip to main content

Using Ancillary Data to Improve Prediction of Soil and Crop Attributes in Precision Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geostatistical Applications for Precision Agriculture

Abstract

This chapter describes three geostatistical methods to incorporate secondary information into the mapping of soil and crop attributes to improve the accuracy of their predictions. The application of the methods is illustrated in two case studies. Cokriging is the multivariate extension of the well known ordinary kriging. It does not require ancillary data to be available at all nodes of the interpolation grid, whereas kriging with external drift and simple kriging with local means do. Cokriging, however, is more demanding in terms of variogram inference and modelling. The other two methods use ancillary data to model the spatial trend of the primary variable. Kriging with an external drift can account for local changes in the linear correlation between primary and secondary variables. Simple kriging with local means, which applies kriging to regression residuals and adds the kriged residual to the regression estimate, is the most straightforward of these methods to implement. The prediction performance of each technique was evaluated by cross-validation. As the results are site-specific, the choice of technique for a given site should be guided by the results of cross-validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avery, B. W., & Bascomb, C. L. (1974).Soil survey laboratory methods. Soil survey technical monograph No. 6. Harpenden, UK: Soil Survey of England and Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, S. J., & Oliver, M. A. (2005). The spatial prediction of soil mineral N and potentially available N using elevation.Geoderma,128, 325–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, T. F. A., & McBratney, A. B. (2001). A comparison of prediction methods for the creation of field-extent soil property maps.Geoderma,103, 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobermann, A., & Ping, J. L. (2004). Geostatistical integration of yield monitor data and remote sensing improves yield maps.Agronomy Journal, 96, 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fordham, S. J. (1985).Soils of Crowmarsh Battle Farms. Vol. private, Soil Survey of England and Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge, Y., Thomasson, J. A., Morgan, C. L., & Searcy, S. W. (2007). VNIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for agricultural soil property determination based on regression-kriging.Transactions of the ASABE, 50, 1081–1092.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, R. J., & Miller, P. C. H. (2003). A review of the technologies for mapping within-field variability.Biosystems Engineering, 84, 393–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts, P. (1997).Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts, P. (1999). Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives.Geoderma, 89, 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts, P. (2000). Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall.Journal of Hydrology, 228, 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heming, S. (1997).Soil survey and soil data base of part of Westridge Farm and Mapletons Farm for Yattendon Estates. Winchester, UK: Soil Services Limited (private report).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerry, R. (2004).Determining the effect of parent material and topography on the spatial structure of variation in soil properties for precision agriculture. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, University of Reading, Reading, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko, A. N., & Robertson, G. P. (2007). Can Topographical and yield data substantially improve total soil carbon mapping by regression kriging.Agronomy Journal,99, 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozar, B., Lawrence, R., & Long, D. S. (2002). Soil phosphorus and potassium mapping using a spatial correlation model incorporating terrain slope gradient.Precision Agriculture, 3, 407–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesch, S. M., & Corwin, D. L. (2008). Prediction of spatial soil property information from ancillary sensor data using ordinary linear regression: model derivations, residual assumptions and model validation tests.Geoderma, 148, 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papritz, A. (2008). Standardized vs. customary ordinary cokriging: some comments on the article “The geostatistical analysis of experiments at the landscape-scale” by T. F. A. Bishop and R. M. Lark.Geoderma, 146, 391–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, A. B., Moore, K. J., Burras, C. L., Bullock, D. G., & Dixon, P. M. (2005). Improving map accuracy of soil variables using soil electrical conductivity as a covariate.Precision Agriculture, 6, 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafilis, J., Odeh, I. O. A., & McBratney, A. B. (2001). Five geostatistical models to predict soil salinity from electromagnetic induction data across irrigated cotton.Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65, 869–878.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vitharana, U. W. A., Van Meirvenne, M., Cockx, L., & Bourgeois, J. (2006). Identifying potential management zones in a layered soil using several sources of ancillary information.Soil Use and Management, 22, 405–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, H. (1995).Multivariate geostatistics. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, H. (2003).Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications, 3rd edition. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R., & Oliver, M.A. (1992). Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties.Journal of Soil Science, 43, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Kerry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goovaerts, P., Kerry, R. (2010). Using Ancillary Data to Improve Prediction of Soil and Crop Attributes in Precision Agriculture. In: Oliver, M. (eds) Geostatistical Applications for Precision Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9133-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics