Abstract
This chapter describes three geostatistical methods to incorporate secondary information into the mapping of soil and crop attributes to improve the accuracy of their predictions. The application of the methods is illustrated in two case studies. Cokriging is the multivariate extension of the well known ordinary kriging. It does not require ancillary data to be available at all nodes of the interpolation grid, whereas kriging with external drift and simple kriging with local means do. Cokriging, however, is more demanding in terms of variogram inference and modelling. The other two methods use ancillary data to model the spatial trend of the primary variable. Kriging with an external drift can account for local changes in the linear correlation between primary and secondary variables. Simple kriging with local means, which applies kriging to regression residuals and adds the kriged residual to the regression estimate, is the most straightforward of these methods to implement. The prediction performance of each technique was evaluated by cross-validation. As the results are site-specific, the choice of technique for a given site should be guided by the results of cross-validation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Avery, B. W., & Bascomb, C. L. (1974).Soil survey laboratory methods. Soil survey technical monograph No. 6. Harpenden, UK: Soil Survey of England and Wales.
Baxter, S. J., & Oliver, M. A. (2005). The spatial prediction of soil mineral N and potentially available N using elevation.Geoderma,128, 325–339.
Bishop, T. F. A., & McBratney, A. B. (2001). A comparison of prediction methods for the creation of field-extent soil property maps.Geoderma,103, 149–160.
Dobermann, A., & Ping, J. L. (2004). Geostatistical integration of yield monitor data and remote sensing improves yield maps.Agronomy Journal, 96, 285–297.
Fordham, S. J. (1985).Soils of Crowmarsh Battle Farms. Vol. private, Soil Survey of England and Wales.
Ge, Y., Thomasson, J. A., Morgan, C. L., & Searcy, S. W. (2007). VNIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for agricultural soil property determination based on regression-kriging.Transactions of the ASABE, 50, 1081–1092.
Godwin, R. J., & Miller, P. C. H. (2003). A review of the technologies for mapping within-field variability.Biosystems Engineering, 84, 393–340.
Goovaerts, P. (1997).Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goovaerts, P. (1999). Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives.Geoderma, 89, 1–45.
Goovaerts, P. (2000). Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall.Journal of Hydrology, 228, 113–129.
Heming, S. (1997).Soil survey and soil data base of part of Westridge Farm and Mapletons Farm for Yattendon Estates. Winchester, UK: Soil Services Limited (private report).
Kerry, R. (2004).Determining the effect of parent material and topography on the spatial structure of variation in soil properties for precision agriculture. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, University of Reading, Reading, England.
Kravchenko, A. N., & Robertson, G. P. (2007). Can Topographical and yield data substantially improve total soil carbon mapping by regression kriging.Agronomy Journal,99, 12–17.
Kozar, B., Lawrence, R., & Long, D. S. (2002). Soil phosphorus and potassium mapping using a spatial correlation model incorporating terrain slope gradient.Precision Agriculture, 3, 407–417.
Lesch, S. M., & Corwin, D. L. (2008). Prediction of spatial soil property information from ancillary sensor data using ordinary linear regression: model derivations, residual assumptions and model validation tests.Geoderma, 148, 130–140.
Papritz, A. (2008). Standardized vs. customary ordinary cokriging: some comments on the article “The geostatistical analysis of experiments at the landscape-scale” by T. F. A. Bishop and R. M. Lark.Geoderma, 146, 391–396.
Tarr, A. B., Moore, K. J., Burras, C. L., Bullock, D. G., & Dixon, P. M. (2005). Improving map accuracy of soil variables using soil electrical conductivity as a covariate.Precision Agriculture, 6, 255–270.
Triantafilis, J., Odeh, I. O. A., & McBratney, A. B. (2001). Five geostatistical models to predict soil salinity from electromagnetic induction data across irrigated cotton.Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65, 869–878.
Vitharana, U. W. A., Van Meirvenne, M., Cockx, L., & Bourgeois, J. (2006). Identifying potential management zones in a layered soil using several sources of ancillary information.Soil Use and Management, 22, 405–413.
Wackernagel, H. (1995).Multivariate geostatistics. Berlin: Springer.
Wackernagel, H. (2003).Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications, 3rd edition. Berlin: Springer.
Webster, R., & Oliver, M.A. (1992). Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties.Journal of Soil Science, 43, 177–192.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goovaerts, P., Kerry, R. (2010). Using Ancillary Data to Improve Prediction of Soil and Crop Attributes in Precision Agriculture. In: Oliver, M. (eds) Geostatistical Applications for Precision Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9133-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9133-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9132-1
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9133-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)