Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trends and Problems in Philosophy of Social and Cultural Sciences: A European Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science

Part of the book series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective ((PSEP,volume 1))

Abstract

For this initial conference of the program on The Philosophy of Science in a European perspective, the Steering Committee suggested an overview of the topics of Team C to be discussed during the five years of this project. The broad title – “Trends and Problems in Philosophy of Social and Cultural Sciences: A European Perspective” – was a way of meeting the aim suggested. Thus, the original focus was to offer some philosophical remarks in terms of possible lines of discussion in this common endeavor.1 But this task requires previous reflection on the general framework: the kind of analysis to be developed and on what might be considered as “a European perspective”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Karl Otto Apel, “Causal Explanation, Motivational Explanation, and Hermeneutical Understanding”, in: Gilbert Ryle (ed.), Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy, Stockfield: Oriel Press 1976, pp. 161-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl Otto Apel, Die Erklären-Verstehen Kontroverse in transzendental-pragmatischer Sicht, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1979. Translated into English by Georgina Warnke: Understanding and Explanation. A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert J. Aumann, “Rationality and Bounded Rationality”, in: Games and Economic Behavior, 21, 1-2, 1997, pp. 2-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry Barnes, Interests and the Growth of Knowledge, London: Routledge and K. Paul 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry Barnes, T. S. Kuhn and Social Science, London: Macmillan 1982 (N. York: Columbia University Press 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry Barnes / David Bloor / John Henry, Scientific Knowledge. A Sociological Analysis, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert C. Bishop, The Philosophy of Social Sciences, London: Continuum 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Bloor, “Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the Sociology of Mathematics”, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 4, 1973, pp. 173-191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David Bloor, “Popper’s Mystification of Objective Knowledge”, in: Science Studies, 4, 1974, pp. 65-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David Bloor, Knowledge and Social Imagery, London: Routledge and K. Paul 1976 (2nd ed., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Bloor, Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge, London: Macmillan 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry M. Collins, “An Empirical Relativist Programme in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge”, in: Karin D. Knorr-Cetina/Michael Mulkay (eds.), Science Observed: Perspectives in the Social Study of Science, London: Sage 1983, pp. 85-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry M. Collins/Trevor Pinch, The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans Georg Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode, Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr (P. Siebeck) 5th ed. 1986 (1st ed. 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald A. Gillies, “El problema de la demarcación y la Medicina alternativa”, in: Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (ed.), Karl Popper: Revisión de su legado, Madrid: Unión Editorial 2004, pp. 197-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amparo Gomez, Filosofía y Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales, Madrid: Alianza Editorial 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, “Prediction and Prescription in Economics: A Philosophical and Methodological Approach”, in: Theoria, 13, 32, 1998, pp. 321-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, “Caracterización de la ‘explicación científica’ y tipos de explicaciones científicas”, in: Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (ed.), Diversidad de la explicación científica, Barcelona: Ariel 2002, pp. 13-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, “From Erklären-Verstehen to Prediction-Understanding: The Methodological Framework in Economics”, in: Matti Sintonen, Petri Ylikoski and Karl Miller (eds.), Realism in Action: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Sciences, Dordrecht: Kluwer 2003, pp. 33-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, “Las revoluciones científicas y la evolución de Thomas S. Kuhn”, in: Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (ed.), Análisis de Thomas Kuhn: Las revoluciones científicas, Madrid: Trotta 2004, pp. 15-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, “The Philosophical Approach to Science, Technology and Society”, in: Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (ed.), Science, Technology and Society: A Philosophical Perspective, A Coruña: Netbiblo 2005, pp. 3-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, “Novelty and Continuity in Philosophy and Methodology of Science”, in: Wenceslao J. Gonzalez and Jesus Alcolea (eds.), Contem

    Google Scholar 

  • porary Perspectives in Philosophy and Methodology of Science, A Coruña: Netbiblo 2006, pp. 1-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, “Prediction as Scientific Test of Economics”, in: Wenceslao J. Gonzalez and Jesus Alcolea (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in Philosophy and Methodology of Science, A Coruña: Netbiblo 2006, pp. 83-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, “The Role of Experiments in the Social Sciences: The Case of Economics”, in: Theo Kuipers (ed.), General Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues, Amsterdam: Elsevier 2007, pp. 275-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clive W. J. Granger, “Testing for Causality, a Personal Viewpoint”, in: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2, 1980, pp. 329-352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clive W. J. Granger, “Where are the Controversies in Econometric Methodology?”, in: Clive W. J. Granger (ed.), Modelling Economics Series: Readings in Econometric Methodology, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1990, pp. 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clive W. J. Granger, “Time Series Analysis, Cointegration, and Applications”, in: Tore Frängsmyr (ed.), From Les Prix Nobel. The Nobel Prizes 2003, Nobel Foundation, Stockholm: Nobel Foundation 2004, pp. 360-366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ian Hacking, The Social Construction of What?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieter Helm, “Predictions and Causes: A Comparison of Friedman and Hicks on Method”, Oxford Economic Papers, new series, 36, 1984, pp. 118-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Hicks, “A Discipline not a Science”, in: John Hicks, Classics and Moderns. Collected Essays on Economic Theory, v. III, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1983, pp. 364-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Hicks, “Is Economics a Science?”, in: Mauro Baranzini/Roberto Scazzieri (eds.), Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford: B. Blackwell 1986, pp. 91-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel Kahneman/Jack Knetsch/Richard Thaler, “Experimenta1 Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem”, in: Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1990, pp. 1325-1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel Kahneman, “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics”, in: American Economic Review, 93, 5, 2003, pp. 1449-1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harold Kincaid, “Social Sciences”, in: Peter Machamer and Michael Silberstein (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Blackwell 2002, pp. 290-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harold Kincaid, “Structural Realism and the Social Sciences”, in: Philosophy of Science, 75, 5, 2008, pp. 720-731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S. Kuhn, “The Trouble with the Historical Philosophy of Science”, lecture at the University of Harvard on 19 November 1991. Paper reprinted in Thomas S. Kuhn, The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview, edited by James Conant and John Haugeland, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 2000, pp. 105-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno Latour, Science in Action, Milton Keynes: Open University Press 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno Latour, Les Microbes: guerre et paix, suivi de Irréductions, Paris: A.- M. Métaillé 1984. Revised and expanded English version, translated by A. Sheridan and J. Law: The Pasteurisation of France, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno Latour, Nous n’avons jamais été modernes – Essai d’anthropologie symétrique, Paris: La Découverte 1991. Revised and augmented edition, translated into English by Catherine Porter: We have Never been Modern, Brighton: Harvester 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar (eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • James W. McAllister, “Editorial: Contours of a European Philosophy of Science”, in: International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 22, 1, 2008, pp. 1-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilkka Niiniluoto, “The Aim and Structure of Applied Research”, in: Erkenntnis, 38, 1993, pp. 1-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilkka Niiniluoto, “Realism, Wordlmaking, and the Social Sciences,” in: Ilkka Niiniluoto, Is Science Progressive?, Dordrecht: Reidel 1984, pp. 211-225. (Symposium on “Scientific Progress and the Social Sciences”, University of Tampere, April, 1980.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilkka Niiniluoto, “Finalization, Applied Science, and Science Policy,” in: Ilkka Niiniluoto, Is Science Progressive?, Dordrecht: Reidel 1984, pp. 226-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilkka Niiniluoto, “Nature, Man, and Technology –Remarks on Sustainable Development,” in: Lassi Heininen (ed.), The Changing Circumpolar North: Opportunities for Academic Development, Arctic Centre Publications 6, Rovaniemi, 1994, pp. 73-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilkka Niiniluoto, Critical Scientific Realism, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilkka Niiniluoto, “World 3: A Critical Defence”, in: Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford and David Miller (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, vol. II, Aldershot: Ashgate 2006, pp. 59-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harold C. Raley, José Ortega y Gasset: Philosopher of the European Unity, Alabama: University of Alabama Press 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf Schäfer (ed.), Finalization in Science. The Social Orientation of Scientific Progress, Dordrecht: Reidel 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert A. Simon, “Prediction and Prescription in Systems Modeling,” in: Operations Research, 38, 1990, pp. 7-14. Reprinted in Herbert A. Simon, Models of Bounded Rationality. Vol. 3: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 1997, pp. 115-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert A. Simon, Models of my Life, N. York, NY: Basic Books 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed., Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 1996 (1st ed., 1969; 2nd ed., 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert A. Simon, “Forecasting the Future or Shaping it?”, in: Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 3, 2002, pp. 601-605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steering Committee, The Philosophy of Science in a European perspective Proposal of an “à la carte Programme” to be submitted to the European Science Foundation, 24 February 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen P. Turner / Paul A. Roth (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Oxford: Blackwell 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Winch, The Idea of a Social Science, London: Routledge and K. Paul 1958 (2nd edition, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg Henrik von Wright, Explanation and Understanding, Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg Henrik von Wright, “Replies,” in: Juha Manninen / Raimo Tuomela (eds.), Essays on Explanation and Understanding. Studies in the Foundations of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dordrecht: Reidel 1976, pp. 371-413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg Henrik von Wright, “Probleme des Erklären und Verstehens von Handlungen,” in: Conceptus, 19, 1985, pp. 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven Woolgar, “Critique and Criticism: Two Readings of Ethnomethodology”, in: Social Studies of Science, 11, 4, 1981, pp. 504-514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steven Woolgar, Science: The Very Idea, London: Tavistock 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven Woolgar (ed.), Knowledge and Reflexitivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge, London: Sage 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Worrall, “Why Randomize? Evidence and Ethics in Clinical Trials”, in: Wenceslao J. Gonzalez and Jesus Alcolea (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in Philosophy and Methodology of Science, A Coruña: Netbiblo 2006, pp. 65-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Worrall, “Why There’s No Cause to Randomize”, in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 58, 3, 2007, pp. 451-488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Humanities, University of A Coruña, Dr. Vazquez Cabrera Street, w/n, 15403, Ferrol, Spain

    Wenceslao J. GonzáLez

Authors
  1. Wenceslao J. GonzáLez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenceslao J. GonzáLez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna, Vienna Circle, Universitätscampus, Hof 1, Vienna, A-1090, Austria

    Friedrich Stadler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

GonzáLez, W.J. (2010). Trends and Problems in Philosophy of Social and Cultural Sciences: A European Perspective. In: Stadler, F. (eds) The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation