Advertisement

The Economic Rationality of Late Parenthood

Chapter

Abstract

Dutch society seems to be a special case: first motherhood comes late, and female labour force participation in hours is relatively low, since many women work in parttime jobs. Formally the Netherlands does not have population policies, but all kind of other specific policy measures are available and may help couples to have children and a decent income from work. The hypothesis tested in this chapter is that women’s labour market activities set a restriction to their number of children and can be hold responsible for the fact that women in the Netherlands have their first child relatively late. Data on the Dutch labour market show that more and more women participate, but parttime work is the watchword. Many start with a fulltime job, but change this job for a parttime job at motherhood. Also women without children tend to resort to parttime jobs over their lifetime. And even when after a certain age children are no longer a restriction on the mother’s labour market participation, many women stick to their parttime jobs: it serves like a “warm, comfortable coat” that is not taken off easily. Culturally the ideology of motherhood is the dominating factor to which the labour market career is adapted. Mothers prefer to keep child care and child raising in their own hands, especially since parents have doubts about the quality of care facilities. In modern society young adults leave the educational system at a higher age than previous birth cohorts, and before starting a family there is a variety of things and places in the world to be discovered. Many young adults also take the chance to first develop their labour market career and commit themselves to their job. As the majority of women wants to combine the best of both worlds they calculate that after having proved a strong labour market commitment during the first stage of their career the employer will be more interested to keep also “mothers” on board. Moreover, the later a woman has her first child, the higher her lifetime earnings. From many socio-economic perspectives late parenthood is a rational outcome, that is not easy to be turned, even not by heavy investments in arrangements to facilitate the combination of child care and paid work. One can only hope that the more men are prepared to share child care and household tasks, the less women will feel to be the only one responsible for the combination of paid work and unpaid care.

Keywords

Labour Market Welfare State Family Formation Labour Market Participation Dutch Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baaijens, C. (2005). Arbeidstijden: tussen wens en werkelijkheid. Utrecht: Dissertatie Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G.S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bloemen, H.G., & Kalwij, A. (2001). Female labor market transitions and the timing of births: a simultaneous analysis of the effects of schooling. Labour Economics, 8, 593–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CPB (2006). Reinventing the Welfare State. Den Haag: Centraal Planbureau.Google Scholar
  5. Den Dulk, L. (2001). Work-Family Arrangerments in Organisations. A Cross-National Study in the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom and Sweden. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Emancipatieraad. (1996). Met zorg naar nieuwe zekerheid. Den Haag: Emancipatieraad.Google Scholar
  7. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Esveldt, I., Beets, G., Henkens, A.K., Liefbroer, A.C., & Moors, H. (2001). Meningen en opvattingen van de bevolking over aspecten van het bevolkingsvraagstuk 1983–2000. Rapport no. 62. Den Haag: Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut.Google Scholar
  9. Mertens, E.H.M. (1998). Loopbaanonderbrekingen en kinderen: gevolgen voor de beloning van vrouwen. Utrecht: Dissertatie Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Remery, C., Doorne-Huiskes, A.van, & Schippers, J.J. (2002). Zorg als arbeidsmarktgegeven: werkgevers aan zet. Publicatie A188. Tilburg: Organisatie voor Strategisch Arbeidsmarktonderzoek.Google Scholar
  11. Román, A.A., & Schippers, J.J. (2007). Vrouwen, gezinnen en werk: een cohortbenadering van de arbeidsparticipatie in Nederland. Tilburg: Organisatie voor Strategisch Arbeidsmarktonderzoek.Google Scholar
  12. Sap, J., & Schippers, J.J. (2005). Moderne levenslopen bieden kans voor doorbreken van m/v-beroepensegregatie. In H. Galesloot (Red.), De glazen muur (25–32). Den Haag: Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.Google Scholar
  13. Schippers, J.J. (2006). We willen werk en zorgtaken gelijk delen. SiS, 2 (3), maart 2006, 52.Google Scholar
  14. SCP (2006a). Tijd voor de basisschool. Factsheet ten behoeve van de invitational conference ‘Tijd voor school 2006’ op 31 mei 2006. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  15. SCP (2006b). Hoe werkt het met kinderen? Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  16. SCP/CBS (2006). Emancipatiemonitor 2006. Den Haag: SCP/CBS.Google Scholar
  17. SZW (1995). Onbetaalde zorg gelijk verdeeld. Toekomstscenario’s voor herverdeling van onbetaalde zorgarbeid. Den Haag: Commissie Toekomstscenario’s Herverdeling Onbetaalde Arbeid.Google Scholar
  18. SZW (2002). Verkenning Levensloop. Beleidsopties voor leren, werken, zorgen en wonen. Den Haag: Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.Google Scholar
  19. Van Nimwegen, N., & Beets, G. (Eds.). (2006). Social Situation Observatory Demographic Monitor 2005, Demographic Trends and Policy Implications in the European Union (355 pp). NIDI Report #72. The Hague, Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations