Abstract
Compared to the offspring of other mammals humans make exceptionally large investments in gestation, delivery, breastfeeding and rearing their children until adulthood. Since the contraceptive revolution women are able to fully control their own reproduction: the stepping stone for female emancipation as it freed them from the burden of reproduction and male dominance. For the first time in history women can choose between motherhood and other activities without suppressing their sexuality. However some unforeseen problems emerged: low and late fertility; population ageing. First motherhood is often postponed nowadays to ages beyond the biological optimum, when having a child seems more convenient from a socio-economic perspective. Subfertility and infertility are therefore on the increase. Surprisingly, the health problems related to delay of childbearing have more or less remained unnoticed so far. Is emancipation still compatible with motherhood in the twenty-first century? The 1970s nurture concept on gender equality is still the prevailing concept in emancipation policies and has hardly been challenged by the new biological insights that men and women are different in some essential aspects. Gender equality should not imply that men and women are the same with regard to their abilities and attitudes towards work and children – the implicit assumption of most emancipation policies today. True equality must entail the notion that both sexes are equivalent in the sense of having the same value, which is different from being the same. Unique female features and abilities such as the deep rooted wish to have a child to care for, to be able to become pregnant, deliver a child, breastfeed, look after babies and better empathic qualities, should not only be accepted and taken into account, but highly appreciated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, V.M., Wilson, R.D., & Cheung, A. (2006). Genetics committee of the society of obstetricians and gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and reproductive endocrinology infertility committee of the society of obstetricians and gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology Canada, 28, 220–250.
Andersen, A.N., Goossens, V., Ferraretti, A.P., Bhattacharya, S., Felberbaum, R., de Mouzon, J., & Nygren, K.G. (2008). European IVF-monitoring (EIM) consortium and European society of human reproduction and embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction, 23, 756–771.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The Essential Difference. London: Penguin Books.
Bewley, S., Davies, M., & Braude, P. (2005). Which career first? BMJ, 331, 588–589.
Blossfeld, H. (1995). The New Role of Women: Family Formation in Modern Societies. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Buss, D.M. (1995). Psychological sex differences. Origins through sexual selection. The American Psychologist, 50, 164–168. discussion, 169–171.
Buss, D.M. (1999). Evolutionary Psychology. The New Science of the Mind. Boston, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo, Singapore: Allyn and Bacon.
Campbell, A. (2002). A Mind of Her Own. The Evolutionary Psychology of Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. (2001). Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,208 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet, 358, 1389–1399.
De Waal, F. (1982). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes. Baltimore, Maryland: The John Hopkins University Press.
De Waal, F.B. (1999). The end of nature versus nurture. Scientific American, 281, 94–99.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2002). A new gender contract. In G. Esping-Andersen & A. Hemerijck (Eds.), Why We Need a New Welfare State (68–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hakim, C. (2000). Work-Lifestyle Choices in The 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J.F., Jones, N.G., Alvarez, H., & Charnov, E.L. (1998). Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 1336–1339.
Helmerhorst, F.M., Perquin, D.A., Donker, D., & Keirse, M.J. (2004). Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ, 328, 261.
Hewlett, S.A. (2002). Baby Hunger. The New Battle for Motherhood. London: Atlantic Books.
Hrdy, S.B. (1999). Mother Nature. A History of Mothers, Infants and Natural Selection. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Hyde, J.S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.
Leridon, H. (2004). Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Human Reproduction, 19, 1548–1553.
Luke, B., & Brown, M.B. (2007). Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age. Human Reproduction, 22, 1264–1272.
Lutz, W., Mamolo, M., Potančoková, M., Scherbov, S., & Sobotka, T. (2008). European Demographic Data Sheet 2008. http://www.populationeurope.org
Potts, M., & Short, R.V. (1999). Ever Since Adam and Eve. The Evolution of Human Sexuality. (First edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rensman, E. (2006). De pil in Nederland. Een mentaliteitsgeschiedenis. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
Riddle, J. (1997). Eve’s Herbes. A History of Contraception and Abortion in the West. Cambridge (Massachusetts), London: Harvard University Press.
Rosenberg, K., & Travathon, W. (2001). The evolution of human birth. Scientific American, 285, 72–78.
Short, R.V. (1994). Why sex? In R.V. Short & E. Balaban (Eds.), The Differences Between the Sexes (3–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shorter, E. (1991). Women’s Bodies. A Social History of Women’s Encounter with Health, Ill-Health and Medicine. New Brunswick (USA) and London (UK): Transaction Publishers.
Spar, D.L. (2006). The Baby Business. How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Stewart, D. (1984). The pelvis as a passageway. Evolution and adaptations. British Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology, 91, 611–617.
Te Velde, E.R., Habbema, J.D., Hilders, C.G., & Merkus, J.M. (2007). The consequences of postponing pregnancy. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd., 151, 1593–1596.
Te Velde, E.R., & Pearson, P.L. (2002). The variability of female reproductive ageing. Human Reproduction Update, 8, 141–154.
Templeton, A., Morris, J.K., & Parslow, W. (1996). Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilization treatment. Lancet, 348, 1402–1406.
Van de Kaa, D.J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42, 1–59.
Van Noord-Zaadstra, B.M., Looman, C.W., Alsbach, H., Habbema, J.D., Te Velde, E.R., & Karbaat, J. (1991). Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy. BMJ, 302, 1361–1365.
Venter, J.C., Adams, M.D., Myers, E.W., Li, P.W., Mural, R.J., Sutton, G.G., Smith, H.O., Yandell, M., Evans, C.A., Holt, R.A., et al. (2001). The sequence of the human genome. Science, 291, 1304–1351.
Weisglas-Kuperus, N., Hille, E.T., Duivenvoorden, H.J., Finken, M.J., Wit, J.M., Van Buuren, S., Van Goudoever, J.B., Verloove-Vanhorick, S.P., & Dutch POPS-19 Collaborative Study Group. (2009). Intelligence of very preterm or very low birthweight infants in young adulthood. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 94, F196–F200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
te Velde, E.R. (2011). Is Women’s Emancipation Still Compatible with Motherhood in Western Societies?. In: Beets, G., Schippers, J., te Velde, E. (eds) The Future of Motherhood in Western Societies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8969-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8969-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8968-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8969-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)