Abstract
The revival of public and scholarly interest in collective cultural memories since the 1980s has been a genuinely global phenomenon and is somewhat paradoxical. Memory is a form of temporal awareness more readily associated with traditional, nonindustrialized societies rather than with the globalized, mobile, and deracinated world of today, which ostensibly floats free of all historical moorings, disconnected from earlier generations and periods. Yet the rise of a self-consciously postmodern, postcolonial, and multicultural society seems to have reanimated memory as a social, cultural, and political force with which to challenge, if not openly reject, the founding myths and historical narratives that have hitherto given shape and meaning to established national and imperial identities. This trend, initially accelerated by the lifting of the censorship and political constraints that had been imposed in both the “East” and the “West” during the Cold War, has been facilitated since the mid-1990s by the Internet, the default source of information in the global public sphere. Uncovering the historical experiences of marginalized communities, previously silenced because of their ethnicity, religion, gender, or sexuality, is now a primary objective of historical inquiry. It is inspired in part by an emerging “politics of regret” (Olick & Robbins, 1998, p. 107) but also by a desire to provide a sense of historical legitimacy and depth to newly established social, cultural, and political constituencies. This change has necessitated an increased level of systematic analysis of different kinds of nontextual evidence, from oral testimonies to the many other nonwritten ways in which intergenerational individual and collective memories have been articulated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Assmann, A. (1996). Texts, traces, trash: The changing media of cultural memory. Representations, 56, 123–134.
Assmann, A. (2009). Erinnerungsräume. Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses [Commemorative spaces: Forms and changes in cultural memory] (4th ed.). Munich: C. H. Beck.
Assmann, J. (1992). Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in den frühen Hochkulturen [Cultural memory: Writing, remembrance, and political identity in ancient civilizations]. Munich: C. H. Beck.
Assmann, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, 65, 125–133.
Azaryahu, M., & Kellerman, A. (1999). Symbolic places of national history and revival: A study in Zionist mythical geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 24, 109–123.
Basso, K. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
Connerton, P. (1989). How societies remember. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Neural components of social evolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 639–649.
DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287.
Fiedler, K., & Juslin, P. (2006). Taking the interface between mind and the environment seriously. In K. Fiedler & P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 3–29). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Foote, K., Tóth, A., & Árvay, A. (2000). Hungary after 1989: Inscribing a new past on place. The Geographical Review, 90, 301–334.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1960). Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik [Truth and method: Principles of philosophical hermeneutics]. Tübingen: Mohr.
Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective memory (F. J. Didder Jr. & V. Yazdi Ditter, Trans., with an introduction by M. Douglas). New York: Harper and Row. (Original work published 1950)
Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (Eds.). (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutton, P. (2000). Recent scholarship on memory and history. The History Teacher, 33, 533–548.
Kansteiner, W. (2002). Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory. History and Theory, 41, 179–197.
Klein, K. L. (2000). On the emergence of memory in historical discourse. Representations, 69, 127–150.
Kokosalakis, N. (2001). Symbolism (religious) and icon. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 23, pp. 15354–15376). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Liebenberg, L. (1990). The art of tracking—The origin of science. Claremont: David Philip Publishers.
Maran, J. (2006). Architecture, power and social practice: An introduction. In J. Maran, C. Juwig, H. Schwengel, & U. Thaler (Eds.), Constructing power: Architecture, ideology and social practice (pp. 9–14). Hamburg: LIT.
Merikle, P. M. (2000). Subliminal perception. In E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 497–499). New York: Oxford University Press.
Merikle, P. M., & Daneman, M. (1998). Psychological investigations of unconscious perception. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5, 5–18.
Míšková, A. (2005). “Politische Säuberungen” der Bestände der wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken der tschechoslowakischen Akademie der Wissenschaften in den 1950er Jahren [“Political purges” of the scientific libraries of the Czechoslovakian Academy of Sciences in the 1950s]. In M. Anděl, D. Brandes, A. Labisch, J. Pešek, & T. Ruzicka (Eds.), Veröffentlichungen zur Kultur und Geschichte im östlichen Europa: Vol. 27. Propaganda, (Selbst-)Zensur, Sensation. Grenzen von Presse- und Wissenschaftsfreiheit in Deutschland und Tschechien seit 1871 (pp. 235–243). Essen: Klartext.
Musil, R. (1987). Monuments. In R. Musil (Ed.), Posthumous papers of a living author (pp. 64–68). New York: Marsilio. (Original work published 1932)
Olick, J. K., & Robbins, J. (1998). Social memory studies: From “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105–140.
Poirion, D., & Angelo, G. V. (1999). Literature as memory: “Wo die Zeit wird Raum”. In S. Amer & N. D. Guynn (Eds.), Rereading allegory: Essays in memory of Daniel Poirion (Vol. 95, pp. 33–46). Yale French Studies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious (Vol. 19). Oxford Psychology Series. New York: Clarendon Press.
Rowlands, M. (1993). The role of memory in the transmission of culture [Special issue]. World Archaeology, 25(2), 141–151.
Saler, M. (1998). Hearing voices of the past: Comments on Toews and Zolberg. Theory and Society, 27, 591–595.
Smith, A. D. (1996). Culture, community and territory: The politics of ethnicity and nationalism. International Affairs, 72, 445–458.
Squire, L. R. (1986). Mechanisms of memory. Science, 232, 1612–1619.
Wright, J. C. (2006). The social production of space and the architectural reproduction of society in the bronze age Aegean during the 2nd millennium B.C.E. In J. Maran, C. Juwig, H. Schwengel, & U. Thaler (Eds.), Constructing power: Architecture, ideology and social practice (pp. 49–74). Hamburg: LIT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meusburger, P., Heffernan, M., Wunder, E. (2011). Cultural Memories: An Introduction. In: Meusburger, P., Heffernan, M., Wunder, E. (eds) Cultural Memories. Knowledge and Space, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8945-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8945-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8944-1
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8945-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)