Skip to main content

Design-Based Research : Reflections on Some Epistemological Issues and Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Methodological Choice and Design

Part of the book series: Methodos Series ((METH,volume 9))

Abstract

The notion of design experiments was first introduced by Ann Brown in 1992 (Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178). Since then there have been successive waves of interest in this notion, and its extension in the form of design-based research, culminating in the recent publication of several edited books and special issues on design research methods in education. In her original article, Brown argued for design experiments on the grounds that they would make laboratory experiments and theory development more relevant to educational practice and vice versa. This chapter examines the notion of the design experiment as presented in Brown’s original article, and re-considers the methodological issues she identified in conducting this kind of research in the light of recent methodological developments. The chapter then goes on to discuss three limitations in the design-based research literature: the attention given to epistemological issues, some insularity in the literature, and the turn to engineering for research methods guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abell, P. (2004). Narrative explanations: An alternative to variable-centered explanation?Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 287–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2005). Why design-based research is both important and difficult. Educational Technology, 45(1), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A ‘historical’ sketch of research and teaching. Educational Researcher, 18, 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M. (1996). How instruction influences children’s concepts of evolution. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3, 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarson, M. A., & Lesh, R. A. (2008). Engineering and design research. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 96–110). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E. R. (1994). Integrating the quantitative and qualitative. In C. S. Reichardt & S. F. Rallis (Eds.), The qualitative–quantitative debate: New perspectives (pp. 13–22). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. E. (2003). Theme issue: The role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. Y. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.), (2009). An introduction to educational design research. Enschede: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, P. (1996). A sociocultural view of the mathematics education of young children. In H. Mansfield, N. A. Pateman, & N.Bednarz (Eds.), Mathematics for tomorrow’s young children: International perspectives on curriculum (pp. 59–78). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design experiments. Educational Researcher, 32, 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research.London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Walker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walker, R. (2011). Design-Based Research : Reflections on Some Epistemological Issues and Practices. In: Markauskaite, L., Freebody, P., Irwin, J. (eds) Methodological Choice and Design. Methodos Series, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8933-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics