Abstract
Thinking comparatively is a state of mind. Scholars of comparative religion, comparative anatomy, comparative sociology, and comparative politics have long grappled with how to develop a systematic science of comparison. Philosophers such as John Stuart Mill (1843, A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive) also contributed significantly to the art of thinking comparatively. More recently, comparative research in education has been influenced by diverse currents, drawn from positivism/scientism; dependency theory, post-colonialism, globalisation and studies of diaspora, the latter two of which have problematised the taken-for-granted status of the nation-state as unit of analysis. Common to many such efforts is the ongoing effort to understand, articulate, and refine, both the rationale for comparison, and appropriate theories and methods of comparative research. This chapter reviews what it means to think comparatively, what it can contribute to educational research, and some of the major schemas on how to go about it.
Without comparisons, we could neither talk nor think.
(Deutsch , Dominguez & Heclo , 1981 p. 4)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adelman, C. (2009). The spaces between the numbers. getting international data on higher education straight. Washington DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1979). Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Verso.
Agger, B. (1991). A critical theory of public life: Knowledge theory and discourse in an age of decline.London: Falmer Press.
Ballér, E. (1975). Commentary 1. In A. Purves & A. Levine (Eds.), Educational policy and international assessment. Implications of the IEA studies of achievement (pp. 84–88). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
Bereday, G. (1964). Comparative method in education. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Bhaba, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
Bierstedt, R. (1979). Sociological thought in the eighteenth century. In T. Bottomore, & R. Nisbet (Eds.), A history of sociological analysis (pp. 3–38). London: Heinemann.
Comte, A. (1848). A general view of positivism (J. Bridges, Trans.). Paris: Academic Reprints [no date].
Comte, A. (1853). The general philosophy of August Comte (2 Vols.). (H. Martineau, Trans.). London: Trübner.
Comber, L., & Keeves, J. (1973). Science education in nineteen countries. New York: John Wiley; Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Coulby, D. (1995). Ethnocentricity, post modernity and European curricular systems. European Journal of Teacher Education, 18(2/3), 143–153.
Coulby, D., & Jones, C. (1996). Post-modernity and European education systems. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
Coulby, D., & Jones, C. (1997). Post-modernity, education and European identities. Comparative Education, 32(2), 171–184.
Cowen, R. (1996). Last past the post: Comparative education, modernity, and perhaps post-modernity. Comparative Education, 32(2), 151–170.
Curtis, M. (1968). Comparative government and politics. An introductory essay in political science. London: Harper and Row.
Deutsch, K., Dominguez, J., & Heclo, H. (Eds.). (1981). Comparative government: Politics of industrialised and developing nations.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Durkheim, E. (1964). The rules of sociological method. London: Collier Macmillan.
Eckstein, M., & Noah, H. (1969). Scientific investigations in comparative education. London: Collier Macmillan.
Foshay, A. (Ed.). (1962). Educational achievement of thirteen-year-olds in twelve countries. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute of Education.
Fraser, S. (1964). Jullien’s plan for comparative education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Giddens, A. (1979). Positivism and its critics. In T. Bottomore & R. Nisbet (Eds.), A history of sociological analysis (pp. 237–286). London: Heinemann.
Giroux, H. (Ed.). (1991). Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics. New York: State University of New York Press.
Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings. Cultural workers and the politics of education. London: Routledge.
Goldstein, H. (2004). Education for all. The globalisation of learning targets. Comparative Education, 40(1), 7–14.
Gottlieb, E. (1996). Mapping the utopia of professionalism: The first carnegie international survey of the academic profession. In R. Paulston (Ed.), Social cartography. Mapping ways of seeing social and educational change (pp. 249–266). New York: Garland.
Habermas, J. (1971a). Knowledge and human interests (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1971b). Technology and science as ‘ideology’, toward a rational society. London: Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1976). Legitimation crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1, Reason and the rationalisation of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hans, N. (1949). Comparative education. A study of educational factors and traditions. London, Routledge.
Harbison, F., & Myers, C. (1964). Education, manpower and economic growth. London: McGraw Hill.
Hayhoe, R. (2000). Redeeming modernity. (Presidential address). Comparative Education Review, 44, 423–439.
Herodotus (1964). The Persian wars. London: McGraw Hill.
Heyman, R. (1979). Comparative education from an ethnomethodological perspective. Comparative Education, 15(3), 241–249.
Heyman, R. (1980). Ethnomethodology: Some suggestions for the sociology of education. Journal of Educational Thought, 14(1), 44–48.
Holmes, B. (1965). Problems in education. A comparative approach. London: Routledge.
Holmes, B. (1981). Comparative education. Some considerations of method. London: Allen and Unwin.
Husén, T. (1967). A comparison of twelve countries: International study of achievement in mathematics(Vols. 1–2). Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
Inkeles, A., & Smith, D. (1974). Becoming modern. London: Heinemann.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (1970). Stockholm: Wenner-Gren Centre.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (1972a, May). IEA Newsletter, 5.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (1972b, August). IEA Newsletter, 6.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (1973, May). IEA Newsletter, 7.
Jullien, M.-A. (1817). Esquisse d’un Ouvrage sur l’education Comparèe. Paris: de Fain.
Kandel, I. (1933). Studies in comparative education. London: George Harrap.
Lather, P. (1996). Postcolonial feminism in an international frame: From mapping the researched to interrogating mapping. In R. Paulston (Ed.), Social cartography. Mapping ways of seeing social and educational change (pp. 357–374). Garland: New York.
Mausolff, C. (1996). Postmodernism and participation in international rural development projects; textual and contextual considerations. In R. Paulston (Ed.), Social cartography. Mapping ways of seeing social and educational change (pp. 267–290). New York: Garland.
McClelland, D. (1961). The achieving society. London: Van Nostrand.
McLaren, P. (1991). Schooling the postmodern body: Critical pedagogy and the politics of enfleshment. In H. Giroux (Ed.), Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Mill, J. S. (1843). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
Morrow, R., & Torres, C. A. (1995). Social theory and education. A critique of theories of social and cultural reproduction. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Ninnes, P., & Mehta, S. (2004). Re-imagining comparative education. London, New York: Routledge.
Niranjana, T. (1992). Siting translation. History, poststructuralism and the colonial context. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Noah, H. (1973). Defining comparative education: Conceptions. In R. Edwards, B. Holmes, & J. Van de Graff (Eds.), Relevant methods in comparative education. Hamburg: UNESCO.
Noah, H., & Eckstein, M. (1969). Towards a science of comparative education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Norris, C. (1993). The truth about postmodernism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
O’Neill, J. (1995). The poverty of postmodernism. London: Routledge.
Parsons, T. (1949). The structure of social action. New York: The Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system.New York, Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1967). Sociological theory and modern society. New York: The Free Press.
Passow, H., Noah, H. J., Eckstein, M. A., & Mallea, J. R. (1976). The national case study: An empirical comparative study of twenty-one educational systems. (Foreword by Torsten Husén). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International; New York: John Wiley.
Paulston, R. (1996). Social cartography. Mapping ways of seeing social and educational change. New York: Garland.
Paulston, R., & Liebman, M. (1994). An invitation to postmodern social cartography. Comparative Education Review, 38(2), 215–252.
Petty, W. (1690). Political arithmetick. London, Printed for Robert Clavel and Henry Mortlock at the Phoenix, St Pauls Churchyard.
Platt, W. (1975). Policy making and international studies in educational evaluation. In A. Purves & A. Levine (Eds.), Educational policy and international assessment. Implications of the IEA studies of achievement (pp. 33–59). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
Postlethwaite, T. (Ed.). (1967). School organization and student achievement: A study based on achievement in mathematics in twelve countries. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell; New York: John Wiley.
Postlethwaite, T. (1975). The surveys of the international association for the evaluation of educational achievement (IEA), In A. Purves & D. Levine (Eds.), Educational policy and international assessment. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
Purves A. (1973). Literature education in ten countries. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell; New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Purves, A., & Levine, A. (Eds.). (1975). Educational policy and international assessment. Implications of the IEA studies of achievement. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
Roberts, G. (1972). What is comparative politics? London: Macmillan.
Rosier, M. (1973). Science achievement in Australian secondary schools. Some school results from the IEA science project. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
Rust, V. (1991). Postmodernism and its comparative education implications. Comparative Education Review, 35(4), 110–126.
Sadler, M. (1900). How far can we learn anything of practical value from the study of foreign systems of education? In N. Hans (1949). Comparative education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Schneider, F. (1947). Triebkräfte der Pädagogik der Völker. Salzburg: Otto Muller.
Schriewer, J. (2006). Comparative social science: Characteristic problems and changing problems solutions. Comparative Education, 42(3), 299–336.
Sen, A. (2005). China and India, The Argumentative Indian. Writings on Indian culture, history and identity (pp. 161–190). London: Penguin.
Snodgrass, A. (1992). Asian studies and the fusion of horizons. Asian Studies Review, 15(3), 81–94.
Stromquist, N. (1996). Mapping gendered spaces in third world educational interventions. In R. Paulston (Ed.), Social cartography. Mapping ways of seeing social and educational change (pp. 223–248). New York: Garland.
Thorndike, R. (1973). Reading comprehension education in fifteen countries: An empirical study. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
Tiryakian, E. A. (1979). Emile durkheim. In T. Bottomore & R. Nisbet (Eds.), A history of sociological analysis (pp. 187–236). London: Heinemann.
Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty eight countries. Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: IEA.
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMMS). (2004a). Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMMS). (2004b). Findings from iea’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. TIMSS 2003 international science report. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMMS). (2007a). Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMMS). (2007b). Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. TIMSS 2003 international science report. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Welch, A. (1985). The functionalist tradition in comparative education. Comparative Education, 21(1), 5–19.
Welch, A. (1986). A critique of quotidian reason in comparative education. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 1, 37–62.
Welch, A. (2007). Technocracy, uncertainty and ethics. Comparative education in an age of post-modernity and globalisation. In R. Arnove & C. Torres (Eds.), Comparative education. The dialectic of the local and the global (pp. 21–46). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Whidden, C. (2005, September). Xenophon’s account of Persia in the Cyropaedia. Paper presented. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Xenophon. (1880). The Cyropaedia, or the institutions of Cyrus, and the Hellenics, or Grecian history (J. Watson & H. Dale, Trans.). London: George Bell and Sons.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Welch, A. (2011). The Challenge of Comparative Research : A Critical Introduction. In: Markauskaite, L., Freebody, P., Irwin, J. (eds) Methodological Choice and Design. Methodos Series, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8933-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8933-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8932-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8933-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)