Abstract
We address the question of when the relative complicatedness of spatial agent-based models (ABMs) compared to alternative modelling approaches can be justified. The spectrum of ABM types from simple, abstract models to complicated models aspiring to realism makes a single answer impossible. Therefore we focus on identifying circumstances where the advantages of ABMs outweigh the additional effort involved. We first recall the reasons for building any model: to simplify the phenomena at hand to improve understanding. Thus, the representational detail of ABMs may not always be desirable. We suggest that critical aspects of the phenomena of interest that help us to assess the likely usefulness of ABMs are the nature of the decisions which actors make, and how their decisions relate to the spatio-temporal grain and extent of the system. More specifically, the heterogeneity of the decision-making context of actors, the importance of interaction effects, and the overall size and organization of the system must be considered. We conclude by suggesting that there are good grounds based on our discussion for ABMs to become a widely used approach in understanding many spatial systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Axelrod, R. M. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems. Reading: Perseus Books.
Batty, M. (2005). Cities and complexity: Understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models and fractals. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Berec, L. (2002). Techniques of spatially explicit individual-based models: Construction, simulation, and mean-field analysis. Ecological Modelling, 150, 55–81.
Birkin, M., & Wu, B. (2012). A review of microsimulation and hybrid agent-based approaches. In A. J. Heppenstall, A. T. Crooks, L. M. See & M. Batty (Eds.), Agent-based models of geographical systems (pp. 51–68). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bretagnolle, A., Pumain, D., & Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, C. (2009). The organization of urban systems. In D. Lane, D. Pumain, S. E. van der Leeuw, & G. West (Eds.), Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change (pp. 197–220). New York: Springer.
Brown, D. G., & Robinson, D. T. (2006). Effects of heterogeneity in residential preferences on an agent-based model of urban sprawl. Ecology and Society, 11, 46–65.
Carpenter, S. R. (2003). The need for fast-and-frugal models. In C. D. Canham, J. J. Cole, & W. K. Lauenroth (Eds.), Models in ecosystem science (pp. 455–460). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cetin, N., Nagel, K., Raney, B., & Voellmy, A. (2002). Large-scale multi-agent transportation simulations. Computer Physics Communications, 147, 559–564.
Clark, J. S., Carpenter, S. R., Barber, M., Collins, S., Dobson, A., Foley, J. A., et al. (2001). Ecological forecasts: An emerging imperative. Science, 293, 657–660.
Couclelis, H. (2002). Why I no longer work with agents: A challenge for ABMs of human-environment interactions. In D. C. Parker, T. Berger, & S. M. Manson (Eds.), Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change: Report and review of an international workshop, Irvine, Oct 4–7, 2001 (pp. 3–5). Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium: LUCC International Project Office.
Crooks, A. T. & Heppenstall, A. J. (2012). Introduction to agent-based modelling. In A. J. Heppenstall, A. T. Crooks, L. M. See & M. Batty (Eds.), Agent-based models of geographical systems (pp. 85–105). Dordrecht: Springer.
Deaton, M. L., & Winebrake, J. J. (2000). Dynamic modeling of environmental systems. New York: Springer.
Dietrich, W. E., Belugi, D. G., Sklar, L. S., Stock, J. D., Heimsath, A. M., & Roering, J. J. (2003). Geomorphic transport laws for predicting landscape form and dynamics. In P. R. Wilcock & R. M. Iverson (Eds.), Prediction in geomorphology (Geophysical monograph, Vol. 135, pp. 1–30). Washington DC: American Geophysical Union.
Eberlein, R. L., & Peterson, D. W. (1994). Understanding models with VenSim. In J. D. W. Morecroft & J. D. Sterman (Eds.), Modeling for learning organizations (pp. 339–348). New York, NY: Productivity Press.
Ehrlich, P. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005). The evolution of norms. PLoS Biology, 3, e194. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030194.
Epstein, J. M. (2009). Modelling to contain pandemics. Nature, 460, 687.
Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
Fossett, M. A. (2006). Ethnic preferences, social distance dynamics, and residential segregation: Theoretical explorations using simulation analysis. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 30, 185–274.
Goering, J. (2006). Shelling [sic] redux: How sociology fails to make progress in building and empirically testing complex causal models regarding race and residence. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 30, 299–317.
Grimm, V. & Railsback, S. F. (2012). Designing, formulating and communicating agent-based models. In A. J. Heppenstall, A. T. Crooks, L. M. See & M. Batty (Eds.), Agent-based models of geographical systems (pp. 361–377). Dordrecht: Springer.
Grimm, V., Revilla, E., Berger, U., Jeltsch, F., Mooij, W. M., Railsback, S. F., et al. (2005). Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: Lessons from ecology. Science, 310, 987–991.
Gross, D., & Strand, R. (2000). Can agent-based models assist decisions on large-scale practical problems? A philosophical analysis. Complexity, 5, 26–33.
Haklay, M., Schelhorn, T., O’Sullivan, D., & Thurstain-Goodwin, M. (2001). “So go down town”: Simulating pedestrian movement in town centres. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 28, 343–359.
Helbing, D., Molnár, P., Farkas, I. J., & Bolay, K. (2001). Self-organizing pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 361–383.
Iwasa, Y. (2000). Lattice models and pair approximation in ecology. In U. Dieckmann, R. Law, & J. A. J. Metz (Eds.), The geometry of ecological interactions: Simplifying spatial complexity (pp. 227–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jennings, N. R., Sycara, K., & Wooldridge, M. (1998). A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1, 7–38.
Kerridge, J., Hine, J., & Wigan, M. (2001). Agent-based modelling of pedestrian movements: The questions that need to be asked and answered. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 327–341.
Matthews, R. (2006). The People and Landscape Model (PALM): Towards full integration of human decision-making and biophysical simulation models. Ecological Modelling, 194, 329–343.
Millington, J., Romero-Calcerrada, R., Wainwright, J., Perry, G. W. L. (2008). An agent-based model of Mediterranean agricultural land-use/cover change for examining wildfire risk. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(4), 4. Available at: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/4/4.html
Milne, E., Aspinall, R. J., & Veldkamp, T. A. (2009). Integrated modeling of natural and social systems in land change science. Landscape Ecology, 24, 1145–1147.
Muetzelfeldt, R. I., & Massheder, J. (2003). The Simile visual modelling environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 345–358.
O’Sullivan, D. (2008). Geographical information science: Agent-based models. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 541–550.
O’Sullivan, D., & Haklay, M. (2000). Agent-based models and individualism: Is the world agent-based? Environment and Planning A, 32, 1409–1425.
Perry, G. L. W. (2009). Modelling and simulation. In N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman, & B. Rhoads (Eds.), A companion to environmental geography (pp. 336–357). Hoboken: Wiley.
Railsback, S. F., Lytinen, S. L., & Jackson, S. K. (2006). Agent-based simulation platforms: Review and development recommendations. Simulation, 82, 609–623.
Rand, W., Zellner, M., Page, S. E., Riolo, R., Brown, D. G., & Fernandez, L. E. (2002). The complex interaction of agents and environments: An example in urban sprawl. In C. Macal & D. Sallach, (Eds.), Proceedings of Agent 2002: Social Agents: Ecology, Exchange, and Evolution (pp. 149–161). Chicago: University of Chicago and Argonne National Lab. Available at http://www.dis.anl.gov/pubs/2002%20Proceedings.pdf
Sanders, L., Pumain, D., Mathian, H., Guerin-Pace, F., & Bura, S. (1997). SIMPOP: A multi-agents system for the study of urbanism. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 287–305.
Sayer, A. (1985). The difference that space makes. In D. Gregory & J. Urry (Eds.), Social relations and spatial structures (pp. 49–66). London: Macmillan.
Schelling, T. C. (1969). Models of segregation. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 59, 488–493.
Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
Tesfatsion, L., & Judd, K. L. (2006). Handbook of computational economics, volume II: Agent-based computational economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.
Toroczkai, Z., & Guclu, H. (2007). Proximity networks and epidemics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 378, 68–75.
Weaver, W. (1948). Science and complexity. American Scientist, 36, 536–544.
Wegener, M. (2004). Overview of land-use transport models. In D. A. Hensher & K. Button (Eds.), Transport geography and spatial system (pp. 127–146). Kidlington: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Sullivan, D., Millington, J., Perry, G., Wainwright, J. (2012). Agent-Based Models – Because They’re Worth It?. In: Heppenstall, A., Crooks, A., See, L., Batty, M. (eds) Agent-Based Models of Geographical Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8927-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8927-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8926-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8927-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)