Skip to main content

Forecasting Migration: Selected Models and Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Forecasting International Migration in Europe: A Bayesian View

Part of the book series: The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis ((PSDE,volume 24))

Abstract

In the current chapter, a survey of various models and methods used in migration predictions to date is offered. The rationale is that socio-economic predictions can be based not only on general, well-grounded laws and theories, but also on descriptive models designed to suit specific research questions. The presented overview follows a distinction between deterministic and probabilistic approaches, presented respectively in Sections 4.1 and 4.2, depending on the way the uncertainty issue is treated. The presented models and methods are finally compared and evaluated from the point of view of their usefulness for the purpose of the current and possible future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Informally referred to as ‘the underlying story’ (a term likely coined by Dutch demographer Harri Cruijsen).

  2. 2.

    The mentioned issues have been discussed for example during the ‘Meeting of the Working Group on Population Projections’ in Eurostat (Luxembourg, 15–16 July 2004), and the ‘Joint Eurostat – UN ECE Work Sessions on Demographic Projections’ (Vienna, 21–23 September 2005 and Bucharest, 10–12 October 2007).

  3. 3.

    In Eurostat (2005), the methodology differed for the ‘old’ 15 EU member states and for the 12 accession and candidate countries as of 2004. For the latter, the projections were purely based on judgemental scenarios, while for the former they involved averaging of forecasts yielded using three methods: extrapolation of trends, and econometric analysis of migration determinants, as well as national forecasts (Lanzieri, 2004).

  4. 4.

    Apparently, the majority of population flows concerning the ex-USSR in the period 1992–1998 proved to be internal migration, and migration between the former republics. For example, in Russia alone, over 20.5 million people migrated internally in that period, 5.5 million immigrated from abroad, and 2.6 million emigrated (Wegren & Cooper Drury, 2001, pp. 16, 39). It is, however, worth noting that the two last figures relate to a large extent to the population exchange with the other republics of the former Soviet Union (idem).

  5. 5.

    I am grateful to Izabela Koryś for drawing my attention to this.

  6. 6.

    For a systematic overview of various model classes, see also the typology introduced in Section 4.4 (Figure 4.1).

  7. 7.

    A detailed overview of selected micro- and macro-level migration models, with special focus on the latter (mainly Poisson regression, gravity models and spatial interactions), is also offered in Stillwell and Congdon (1991).

  8. 8.

    The single-region mathematical demography, including the cohort-component approach, is presented in details for example in Keyfitz (1968), Rogers (1975, pp. 7–55), and Jóźwiak (1992, pp. 21–50).

  9. 9.

    Paradysz (2004, pp. 130) noted that an earlier study addressing the same problem was due to Korčak-Čepurkivs’kij (1970), which, however, was published only posthumously. Its author was persecuted under the Stalinist regime and spend 18 years in a Gulag forced labour camp (cf. the interview with A. Višnevskij in Demoscope weekly 197–198, 4–17 April 2005; http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2005/0197/analit01.php, accessed on 25 August 2006).

  10. 10.

    For a mathematical discussion of multi-regional and multi-state models, see Jóźwiak (1992, pp. 51–94, 95–111).

  11. 11.

    Such models are also sometimes referred to as ‘hierarchical’ due to the presence of a hierarchy of regions, although in the current study only the term ‘multi-level’ is used, in order to avoid confusion with hierarchical models in a statistical sense (i.e., models with random parameters or with latent variables, see also Chapter 12).

  12. 12.

    A discussion on the stochastic versions of population dynamics models is offered by Jóźwiak (1992, pp. 113–121).

  13. 13.

    Cf. Charemza and Deadman (1992/1997, pp. 13–22, 151–166); some issues are also addressed in Chapters 6 and http://10.

  14. 14.

    See ‘Markov chain’ and ‘Markov process’ in the Springer online Encyclopaedia of Mathematics (eom.springer.de/M/m062350.htm, eom.springer.de/M/mm062490.htm, accessed on 25 August 2006), and the review of probabilistic literature of the Kolmogorov Library (http://www.kolmogorov.pms.ru/uspensky-predvarenie.html, accessed on 25 August 2006), albeit the latter quoting the 1907 edition of the seminal work of Markov (1906).

  15. 15.

    Overview presented after Kupiszewski (2002b, pp. 28–34). Paradysz (2006, pp. 232) labels such mobility as ‘vertical’, as opposed to ‘horizontal’ (moves in geographic space). Whereas the former can also concern mobility within other social structures (educational, occupational, national, ethnic, etc.), the latter explicitly refers to migration.

  16. 16.

    Many thanks go to Katarzyna Bijak for drawing my attention to Hidden Markov Models, and for a brief tutorial.

  17. 17.

    Methodology, and an overview of possible demographic applications of the event-history analysis is provided in Courgeau and Lelièvre (1992), while a detailed analysis of migration dynamics is discussed in the life-course context by Mulder (1993).

  18. 18.

    One well-known example is the Fertility and Family Survey (FFS), carried out in the 1990s in 20 European countries under the auspices of the Population Activities Unit (PAU) of the UN Economic Commission for Europe, following a common research design. Migration-related questions have been included in one of the optional modules of the original FFS. According to the knowledge of the author, up till the time of writing of this book, the FFS has been repeated only once in a handful of originally-participating countries. Although the PAU also conducts another European-wide survey on Generations and Gender, it does not include any information about migration. More detailed information is available on the PAU website: http://www.unece.org/pau (accessed on 9 August 2006).

  19. 19.

    A brief description of the project, its rationale, basic assumptions, and methodology are offered for example by van der Gaag, de Beer, and Willekens (2005). More details can be found on the project website: http://www.micmac-projections.org (accessed on 30 April 2006).

  20. 20.

    More complete and detailed literature surveys of existing econometric forecasts are presented for example in Alvarez-Plata et al. (2003), in a report of the CPB (2004), as well as in Brücker and Siliverstovs (2005).

  21. 21.

    Some authors underline the association of migration with family formation and dissolution processes, concerning marriages, cohabitations, divorces, and, indirectly, childbearing (Paradysz, 2006, pp. 235). The direct impact of (internal) migration on fertility has been assessed for example by Kulu (2005), who found empirical support for a hypothesis that migrants might adjust their fertility to the levels observed in the host community, rather than preserve levels from their regions of origin. In the case of international migration, however, the situation can be more complex, for example due to the presence of ethnic enclaves (‘ghettos’) which do not facilitate the integration of immigrants with the host society. Moreover, a similar notion of convergence applies to mortality: it can be argued that migrants ‘adjust’ their mortality patterns to the ones prevailing at the destination, via two channels: access to the same health care services and exposure to the same environmental hazards as the host population (e.g., Bijak et al., 2007).

  22. 22.

    More information is available from the project website: http://www.stat.fi/tup/euupe (accessed on 5 May 2006).

  23. 23.

    I am very grateful to Jacek Osiewalski for drawing my attention to this problem.

  24. 24.

    A summary of various probability models that can be used for migration forecasts is offered in Willekens (2008), who argues for using Poisson regression for counts of migrants, logit or logistic models for proportions of migrants in a given population, and Poisson models with offset for occurrence-exposure rates. The discussion further distinguishes models for state occupancies, transition probabilities, and transition rates.

  25. 25.

    Despite a very general title (‘Demographic forecasting’), the book by Girosi and King (2008) explicitly deals in very much detail with various methods for Bayesian forecasting mortality rates by age, time, cause of death, etc.

  26. 26.

    ‘Model’ can be defined as ‘a system of postulates, data, and inferences presented as a mathematical description of an entity or state of affairs’ (the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary; http://www.m-w.com, accessed on 25 April 2006).

References

  • Alecke, B., Huber, P., & Untiedt, G. (2001). What difference a constant makes? How predictable are international migration flows? In Migration policies and EU enlargement. The case of central and eastern Europe (pp. 63–78) Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alho, J. (1998). A stochastic forecast of the population of Finland. Reviews 1998/4. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alho, J. (1999). On probabilistic forecasts of population and their uses. Paper for the 52nd session of the international statistical institute, Helsinki, 10–18 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alho, J., Alders, M., Cruijsen, H., Keilman, N., & Nikander, T. (2005). New forecast: Population decline postponed in Europe. Paper for the joint UNECE-eurostat work session on demographic projections, Vienna, 21–23 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alho, J., & Spencer, B. (2005). Statistical demography and forecasting. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Plata, P., Brücker, H., & Siliverstovs, B. (2003). Potential migration from central and eastern Europe into the EU-15 – An update. Report for the EC DG of employment and social affairs. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Green, K. C. (2007). Methodology tree. In J. S. Armstrong & K. C. Green (Eds.), Forecasting principles (online resource), Philadelphia: Marketing Department of The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania; http://www.forecastingprinciples.com/methodologytree.html (version from Nov 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrell, R., Gottschalk, S., Kirby, S., & Orazgani, A. (2009). Projections of migration inflows under alternative scenarios for the UK and world economies (Economics Paper No. 3). Department for Communities and Local Government, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T., & Zimmermann, K. F. (1999). Assessment of possible migration pressure and its labour market impact following EU following EU enlargement to central and eastern Europe. IZA Research Report 3. Institut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, L. E., & Petrie, T. (1966). Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 37(6), 1554–1563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardelli, H. (1941). Population waves. Journal of the Burma Research Society, 31, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, J. M., & Muñoz, J. (1993). Bayesian analysis of population evolution. The Statistician, 42(4), 541–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berzuini, C., Clayton, D., & Bernardinelli, L. (1993). Bayesian inference on the lexis diagram. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 55(1), 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijak, J. (2008a). Bayesian methods in international migration forecasting. In J. Raymer & F. Willekens (Eds.), Estimation of international migration in Europe: Issues, models and assessment (pp. 255–281). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijak, J., Kupiszewska, D., Kupiszewski, M., Saczuk, K., & Kicinger, A. (2007). Population and labour force projections for 27 European countries, 2002–2052: Impact of international migration on population ageing. European Journal of Population, 23(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijak, J., & Wiśniowski, A. (2010). Bayesian forecasting of immigration to selected European countries by using expert knowledge. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 173(4), 775–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumen, I., Kogan, M., & McCarthy, P. J. (1955). The industrial mobility of labour as a probability process. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, T., & Brücker, H. (2001). Eastern enlargement and EU labour markets: Perceptions, challenges and opportunities (IZA Discussion Paper 256). Institut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. A. (1970). On the use of Markov chains in movement research. Economic Geography, 46(Suppl.), 393–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brücker, H., & Siliverstovs, B. (2006). On the estimation and forecasting of international migration: How relevant is heterogeneity across countries. Empirical Economics, 31(3), 735–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charemza, W. W., & Deadman, D. F. (1992). New directions in econometric practice. Aldershot: Edward Elgar [(1997). Nowa ekonometria. Warszawa: PWE].

    Google Scholar 

  • Chojnicki, Z. (1977). Podstawy metodologiczne prognozowania w geografii ekonomicznej [Methodological foundations of forecasting in economic geography]. Przegląd Geograficzny, 49(2), 247–261. [A similar, earlier paper in English is available as: Chojnicki, Z. (1970). Prediction in economic geography. Economic Geography, 46(2 Suppl.), 213–222.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. S. (2003). Uncertainty and variability in demography and population growth: A hierarchical approach. Ecology, 84(6), 1370–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. E. (1998). Should population projections consider “limiting factors” – And if so, how? Population and Development Review, 24(Suppl.), 118–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. E., Roig, M., Reuman D. C., & GoGwilt, C. (2008). International migration beyond gravity: A statistical model for use in population projections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105(40), 15268–15274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, P. (2000). A Bayesian approach to prediction using the gravity model, with an application to patient flow modelling. Geographical Analysis, 32(3), 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, P. (2001b). The development of gravity models for hospital patient flows under system change: A Bayesian modelling approach. Health Care Management Science, 4(4), 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant, A., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2003). The dynamics of repeat migration: A Markov chain analysis (IZA Discussion Paper 885). Institut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courbis, R. (1979). The REGINA model, a regional-national model for French planning. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 9(2–3), 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D. (1985). Interaction between spatial mobility, family and career life cycle: A French survey. European Sociological Review, 1(2), 139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D. (1995). Migration theories and behavioural models. International Journal of Population Geography, 1(1), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D. (2003). From the macro-micro opposition to multilevel analysis. In D. Courgeau (Ed.), Methodology and epistemology of multilevel analysis (pp. 43–92). Dordrecht : Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D. (2004). Probabilités, demographie et sciences sociales. Mathématiques et Sciences humaines, 42(3), 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D., & Baccaïni, B. (1998). Multilevel analysis in the social sciences. Population–E, 10(1), 39–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D., & Lelièvre, E. (1992). Event history analysis in demography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruijsen, H., & Keilman, N. (1992). A comparative analysis of the forecasting process. In N. Keilman & H. Cruijsen (Eds.), National population forecasting in industrialised countries. NIDI & CBGS publication 24 (pp. 3–25). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Research Memorandum RM-5888-PR. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beer, J. (1997). The effect of uncertainty of migration on national population forecasts: The case of the Netherlands. Journal of Official Statistics, 13(3), 227–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beer, J. (2008). Forecasting international migration: Time series projections vs argument-based forecasts. In J. Raymer & F. Willekens (Eds.), Estimation of international migration in Europe: Issues, models and assessment (pp. 283–306). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, D. (1995). Inference and hierarchical modelling in the social sciences. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(2), 115–147, 233–239 (with discussion).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drbohlav, D. (1996). The probable future of European east-west international migration – Selected aspects. In F. W. Carter, P. Jordan, & V. Rey (Eds.), Central Europe after the fall of the iron curtain; geopolitical perspectives, spatial patterns and trends (pp. 269–296). Frankfurt: Wiener Osteuropa Studien 4. Peter Lang & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, C., Casanova, M., Fertig, M., Preston, I., & Schmidt, C. M. (2003). The impact of EU enlargement on migration flows. Home Office Report 25/03. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2005). Population projections for the European Union 2004–2050. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fachin, S., & Venanzoni, G. (2002). IDEM: An integrated demographic and economic model of Italy. Paper for the 14th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Montreal, Canada, 10–15 Oct.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassmann, H., & Hintermann, C. (1997). Migrationspotential ostmitteleuropa. ISR-Forschungs-berichte 15. Institut für Stadt- und Regionalforschung, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fertig, M., & Schmidt, C. M. (2000). Aggregate-level migration studies as a tool for forecasting future migration streams (IZA Discussion paper 183). Institut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzmeyer, F., & Brücker, H. (1997). Europäische Union: Osterweiterung und Arbeitskräft-emigration. DIW Wochenbericht 5/97 (pp. 89–96). Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, R. B. (1971). Semi-Markov processes and mobility. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(1), 233–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, R. B. (1978). Probability models of residence histories: Analysis of times between moves. In W. A. V. Clark, & E. G. Moore (Eds.), Population mobility and residential change. Studies in Geography 25. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girosi, F., & King, G. (2008). Demographic forecasting. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1961). Statistical methods for the mover-stayer model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56(296), 841–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorbey, S., James, D., & Poot, J. (1999). Population forecasting with endogenous migration: An application to trans-tasman migration. International Regional Science Review, 22(1), 69–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J. (1973). Urban economic growth and migration: Their interaction. Environment and Planning A, 5(1), 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, P., Aeschliman, D., & Levy, A. R. (2003). A simple approach to fitting Bayesian survival models. Lifetime Data Analysis, 9(1), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1957). Migration and area. Survey of a sample of Swedish migration fields and hypothetical considerations on their genesis. In D. Hannerberg, T. Hägerstrand, & B. Odeving (Eds.), Migration in Sweden. A Symposium. “Lund Studies in Geography”, Series B, no. 13 (pp. 27–158). Lund: Gleerup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24(1), 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, T. J., & Williamson, J. G. (1998). The age of mass migration: Causes and economic impact. Oxford, MA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, J. O., & Clark, W. A. V. (1978). The role of stationarity in Markov and opportunity models of intraurban migration. In W. A. V. Clark & E. G. Moore (Eds.), Population mobility and residential change. Studies in Geography 25, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, J. G., Chen, M.-H., & Sinha, D. (2001). Bayesian survival analysis. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennissen, R. (2004). Macro-economic determinants of international migration in Europe. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, G. (1975). A Markov analysis of age/sex differences in inter-regional migration in Britain. Regional Studies, 9(2), 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jóźwiak, J. (1992). Mathematical models of population. NIDI Report 26. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarczyk, P., & Okólski, M. (2008). Demographic and labour-market impacts of migration on Poland. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(3), 599–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilman, N., & Cruijsen, H. (Eds.). (1992). National population forecasting in industrialised countries. NIDI & CBGS publication 24. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilman, N., & Pham, D. Q. (2004b). Empirical errors and predicted errors in fertility, mortality and migration forecasts in the European Economic Area (Discussion Paper No. 386). Social and Demographic Research, Statistics Norway, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilman, N., Pham, D. Q., & Hetland, A. (2001). Norway’s uncertain demographic future. Norway, Oslo: Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. (1968). Introduction to the mathematics of population. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. (1981). The limits of population forecasting. Population and Development Review, 7(4), 579–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. (1982). Can knowledge improve forecasts? Population and Development Review, 8(4), 729–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korčak-Čepurkivs’kij, Ju. A. (1970). Rozrachunok tempu zrastanja kilkosti i vikovoho skladu tych, ščo živut’ u ustabilizovanomu naselenni z postijnym rivnem mihracij. Demohrafična Doslidžennija, 1, 24–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H. (2005). Migration and fertility: Competing hypotheses re-examined. European Journal of Population, 21(1), 51–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupiszewska, D., & Kupiszewski, M. (2005). A revision of a traditional multiregional model to better capture international migration: The MULTIPOLES model and its applications (CEFMR Working Paper 10/2005). Central European Forum for Migration Research, Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupiszewski, M. (1998). Czy na podstawie doświadczeń innych krajów można przewidywać zmiany migracji międzynarodowych po przyjęciu Polski do Unii Europejskiej? [Can the experience of other countries help forecast international migration changes after Poland’s accession to the EU?]. In P. Korcelli (Ed.), Przemiany w zakresie migracji ludności jako konsekwencja przystąpienia Polski do Unii Europejskiej [Changes in migration as a consequence of Poland’s accession to the European Union] (pp. 67–78). Warsaw: Bulletin of the Committee of Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences, no. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupiszewski, M. (2001). Demograficzne aspekty wybranych prognoz migracji zagranicznych [Demographic aspects of selected forecasts of international migration]. In A. Stępniak (Ed.), Swobodny przepływ pracowników w kontekście wejścia Polski do Unii Europejskiej [Free flow of workers in the context of Poland’s accession to the European Union] (pp. 73–98). Warsaw: Office of the Committee of European Integration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupiszewski, M. (2002a). How trustworthy are forecasts of international migration between Poland and the European Union? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(4), 627–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupiszewski, M. (2002b). Modelowanie dynamiki przemian ludności w warunkach wzrostu znaczenia migracji międzynarodowych [The role of international migration in the modelling of population dynamics]. Warsaw: Institute of Geography and Spatial Organisation, Polish Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzieri, G. (2004). EUROPOP 2003: Methodology for drafting international migration assumptions in the EU-15 member states. Paper for the meeting of the Working Group on Population Projections, Luxembourg, 15–16 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M., Goodwin, P., O’Connor, M., & Önkal, D. (2006). Judgemental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25 years. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(3), 493–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., Blanchard, O., Dornbusch, R., & Krugman, P. (1992). East-West migration: The alternatives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D. (1998). Probabilistic approaches to population forecasting. Population and Development Review, 24(Suppl.), 156–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, P. H. (1945). On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika, 33(3), 183–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, J., & Barr, B. M. (1972). Two stochastic approaches to migration: Comparison of Monte Carlo simulation and Markov chain models. Geografiska Annaler B, 54(1), 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litterman, R. B. (1979). Techniques of forecasting using vector autoregressions (Working Paper No. 115). Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., Saariluoma, P., Sanderson, W., & Scherbov, S. (2000). New developments in the methodology of expert- and argument-based probabilistic population forecasting. IIASA Interim Report IR-00-20. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., Sanderson, W., & Scherbov, S. (1996). Probabilistic population projections based on expert opinion. In W. Lutz (Ed.), The future population of the World. What can we assume today? (pp. 397–428). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., Sanderson, W. C., & Scherbov, S. (1998). Expert based probabilistic population projections. Population and Development Review, 24(Suppl.), 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., Sanderson, W. C., & Scherbov, S. (Eds.). (2004). The end of world population growth in the 21st century: New challenges for human capital formation and sustainable development. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis, S, & Hibon, M. (2000). The M3-competition: Results, conclusions and implications. International Journal of Forecasting, 16(4), 451–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markov, A. A. (1906). Rasprostranenie zakona bol’ših čisel na veličiny, zavisjaščie drug ot druga [Extension of the law of large numbers to dependent variables]. Izvestija Fiziko-matematičeskogo obščestva pri Kazanskom universitete, II Series, 15, 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (1987). The ethnosurvey in theory and practice. International Migration Review, 21(4), 1498–1522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Zenteno, R. M. (1999). The dynamics of mass migration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 96(9), 5328–5335.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, R., Myers, G. C., & Pilger, J. (1963). Internal migration as a stochastic process. Paper for the 34th session of the International Statistical Institute, Ottawa, 21–29 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, C. H. (1993). Migration dynamics: A life course approach. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, T. (1986). Bayesian cohort models for general cohort table analyses. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 38, 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, B. (1968). Interstate population migration and state income inequality: A simultaneous equation approach. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 16(2), 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orłowski, W. (2000). Migration from central and eastern European countries after the accession: Effects for regions, labour markets, and social security systems. Research Bulletin, 2(9), 7–21. Central Statistical Office, Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orrell, D. (2007). The future of everything. The science of prediction. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradysz, J. (2004). Marek Kupiszewski – Modelowanie dynamiki przemian ludności w warunkach wzrostu znaczenia migracji międzynarodowych, Wydawnictwo PAN, IGiPZ, Prace Geograficzne nr 181, Warszawa, 2002, ss. 174 (A review). Studia Demograficzne, 145(1), 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradysz, J. (2006). Migracje ludności [Population migration]. In M. Kędelski & J. Paradysz (Eds.), Demografia [Demography] (pp. 231–254). Poznań: Poznań University of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, W. (1682). An essay concerning the multiplication of mankind, together with another essay in political arithmetick concerning the growth of the City of London with the causes and consequences thereof. London. Reprinted within the framework of the Gutenberg Project, http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/5619. Accessed on 15 March 2006.

  • Plane, D. A. (1993). Demographic influences on migration. Regional Studies, 27(4), 375–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plane, D. A., & Rogerson, P. A. (1985). Economic-demographic models for forecasting interregional migration. Environment and Planning A, 17(2), 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prais, S. J. (1955). Measuring social mobility. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 118, 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, P. H. (1996). Projecting national and regional populations of the European Union using the migration information. In P. H. Rees, J. S. C. Stillwell, A. Convey, & M. Kupiszewski (Eds.), Population migration in the European Union (pp. 330–364). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, P. H., Stillwell, J. S. C., & Convey, A. (1992). Intra-community migration and its impact on the development of the demographic structure at regional level (Working Paper 92/1). School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, P. H., & Willekens, F. (1986). Data and accounts. In A. Rogers & F. Willekens (Eds.), Migration and settlement. A multiregional comparative study (pp. 15–59). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, P. H., and Wilson, A. G. (1973). Accounts and models for spatial demographic analysis 1: Aggregate population. Environment and Planning A, 5(1): 61–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (1966). A Markovian policy model of interregional migration. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 17, 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (1975). Introduction to multiregional mathematical demography. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (1980). Introduction to multistate mathematical demography. Environment and Planning A, 12(5), 489–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, P. A. (1984). New directions in the modelling of interregional migration. Economic Geography, 60(2), 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, J., & Singleton, A. (1995). Analysis and forecasting of international migration by major groups. Report to the Working Party on Demographic Projections. Eurostat, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, V., & Knorr-Held, L. (2001). BAMP: Bayesian age-period-cohort modelling and prediction. software documentation. Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W., Flaig, G., Werding, M., Munz, S., Duell, N., & Hofmann, H. (2001). EU-Erweiterung und Arbeitskräftemigration, Wege zu einer schrittweisen Annäherung der Arbeitsmärkte. IFO-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilerman, S. (1972). The analysis of mobility process by the introduction of independent variables into a Markov chain. American Sociological Review, 37(3), 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell, J. C. H., & Congdon, P. (Eds.) (1991). Migration models: Macro and micro approaches. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnqvist, L. (1949). Näkökohdat, jotka ovat määränneet primääristen prognoosiolettamusten valinnan [Points of view that have determined the primary forecast assumptions]. In J. Hyppölä, A. Tunkelo, & L. Törnqvist (Eds.), Suomen väestöä, sen uusiutumista ja tulevaa kehitystä koskevia laskelmia [Calculations concerning the population of Finland, its renewal and future development]. Tilastollisia tiedonantoja 38. Statistics Finland, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuljapurkar, S. (1997). Demography. Taking the measure of uncertainty. Nature, 387(6635), 760–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuljapurkar, S., & Boe, C. (1999). Validation, probability-weighted priors and information in stochastic forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(3), 259–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuljapurkar, S., Lee, R. D., & Li, Q. (2004). Random scenario forecasts versus stochastic forecasts. International Statistical Review, 72(2), 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Gaag, N., de Beer, J., & Willekens, F. (2005). MicMac. Combining micro and macro approaches in demographic forecasting. Paper for the Joint UNECE-Eurostat Work Session on Demographic Projections, Vienna, 21–23 Sep.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Imhoff, E. (1990). The exponential multidimensional demographic projection model. Mathematical Population Studies, 2(3), 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Imhoff, E., & Keilman, N. (1991). LIPRO 2.0: An application of a dynamic demographic projection model to household structure in The Netherlands. NIDI & CBGS Publication 23. Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Imhoff, E., & Post, W. (1998). Microsimulation methods for population projection. Population–E, 10(1), 97–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishnevsky, A., & Zayonchkovskaya, Zh. [Višnevskij, A. G., & Zajončkovskaja, Ž. A.] (1994). Emigration from the former Soviet Union: The fourth wave. In H. Fassmann & R. Münz (Eds.), European migration in the late twentieth century: Historical patterns, actual trends and social implications (pp. 239–259). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegren, S., & Cooper Drury, A. (2001). Patterns of internal migration during the Russian transition. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 17(4), 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidlich, W., & Haag, G. (Eds.). (1988). Interregional migration: Dynamic theory and comparative analysis. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F. (1994). Monitoring international migration flows in Europe. Towards a statistical data base combining data from different sources. European Journal of Population, 10(1), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F. (1995). Multiregional demographic forecasting (Population Research Centre Working Paper 95-1), University of Groningen, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F. (2008). Models of migration: Observations and judgments. In J. Raymer & F. Willekens (Eds.), Estimation of international migration in Europe: Issues, models and assessment (pp. 117–148). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F., & Baydar, N. (1986). Forecasting place-to-place migration with generalized linear models. In R. Woods & P. H. Rees (Eds.), Population structures and models (pp. 203–244). London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. A., & Rannala, B. (2003). Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics, 163(3), 1177–1191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub Bijak .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bijak, J. (2011). Forecasting Migration: Selected Models and Methods. In: Forecasting International Migration in Europe: A Bayesian View. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8897-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics