Skip to main content

Abstract

Over the last decades the development and use of lifestyle typologies in housing research has grown tremendously. However, lifestyle is a complicated construct with many problems attached to it. For example, there is no consensus in the research field about what is meant by lifestyle (definitional consensus), nor what the factors are through which lifestyle is expressed and through which it can be measured (operational clarity). Despite these problems, however, lifestyle typologies are given widespread attention in the domain of housing research. It is appropriate, therefore, that this book on the methods and techniques of research into housing preference and choice dedicates a chapter to lifestyle. In contrast to most of the other methods described in this book, lifestyle research is performed using a large variety of different instruments that range from observational data and document search to standardized (Web-based) questionnaires. However, typically, respondents are placed within one of various lifestyle categories, like “down-to-earth family clan” and “city-edge dwellers,” based on their responses to a survey. It is assumed that respondents who are placed in the same lifestyle category have similar housing preferences. In this chapter, an example is provided of the development of a classification method. Furthermore, the experience with lifestyle research in practice is discussed. However, first the primary motives for the development of lifestyle typologies in the field of housing are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, W. T., & Golden, L. L. (1984). Lifestyle and psychographics: A critical review and recommendation. In T. C. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 405–411). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaansen, I. (1997). Leefstijlen als basis voor het nieuwe wonen. In J. Broess & C. Grijzen (Eds.), Brabant ongemonteerd (pp. 5–20). Den Bosch: Projectburo Brabant 2050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (1958). Social choice, life styles and suburban residence. In W. F. Dobriner (Ed.), The suburban community. New York: Putnam’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction; Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, D. (1996). Lifestyles. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolen, H. (2007). Measurement and analysis of less structured data in housing research. Open House International, 32(3), 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolen, H., Boelhouwer, P., & van Driel, K. (2002). Values and goals as determinants of intended tenure choice. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 17, 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, F. (1996). Woonvoorkeurenonderzoek: Theorie, empirie en relevantie voor de praktijk. Woonconsument en woningkwaliteit 5. Delft: Uitgave Publicatiebureau Bouwkunde.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rooij, L., & Wallagh, G. (2000). Wie Woont er aan de Zuidas? Leefstijlen en Woonarrangementen voor de Zuidas. Amsterdam: Blauwhoed/Eurowoningen, MAB, Woonstichting De Key/De Principaal.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vreeze, N. (1994). Architectuur en bewonersvoorkeuren. In I. Smid & H. Priemus (Eds.), Bewonerspreferenties: Richtsnoer voor investeringen in nieuwbouw en de woningvoorraad (pp. 57–63). Delft: Delftse Universitaire Pers.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wijs-Mulkens, E. (1999). Wonen op stand. Lifestyles en landschappen van de culturele en economische elite. Amsterdam: het Spinhuis.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wijs-Mulkens, E., & Ostendorf, W. (2001). De smaak van het WBO. Smaak in twee dimensies. Tijdschrift voor de Volkshuisvesting, 8, 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, F. M. H. M., & Beereboom, H. J. A. (1983). De kwaliteit van het stedelijk leefmilieu: Bewoners en hun voorkeuren. Utrecht: Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, Vakgroep Theorie en Methodologie van de Sociologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. S., & Dunn, G. D. (2001). Applied multivariate data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. (1976). The differentiation of material lifestyles: 1925–1966. Social Indicators Research, 3, 397–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S., Antes, D., & Beaumier, G. (1992). Nine consumption life-styles. Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. (1968). Urbanism and suburbanism as ways of life. In R. Pahl (Ed.), Readings in urban sociology (pp. 95–114). London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzeboom, H. (1988). Leefstijlen in Nederland. Een verkennende studie. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. Cahier no. 60. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samson Uitgeverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzeboom, H. (1990). Leefstijlen: een theoretische en methodologische beschouwing met een empirisch voorbeeld. In Jaarboek van de Nederlandse Vereniging van Marktonderzoekers (pp. 89–90). Haarlem: De Vrieseborch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibler, K. M., & Nelson, S. L. (2003). Consumer behaviour applications to real estate education. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 6(1), 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünfeld, J. (2003). Gestrand op Kanaleneiland. Woonsatisfactie en verhuisgeneigdheid van Turkse, Marokkaanse en Nederlandse bewoners in een herstructureringswijk te Utrecht. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, B., & Furnham, A. (1992). Consumer profiles. An introduction to psychographics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haest, G. (1989). De oude garde, het andere slag en de buitenlanders. De geschiedenis van een saneringswijk. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, G. J. (2006). Leefstijlen. De klant in de mand… Boss Magazine 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton-Smith, E. (2000). Lifestyles: Patterns and trends (Research discussion paper no 13). Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Centre for Applied Research on the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijs, W., Carton, M., Smeets, J., & van Gemert, A. (2005). Labyrinth van leefstijlen. Eindhoven: Cahier Architectuur Stedebouw Eindhoven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijs, W., Carton, M., Smeets, J., & van Gemert, A. (2009). The labyrinth of life-styles. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(3), 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessing, E., & Reuling, A. M. H. (2003). Waarden in Nederland. Segmentatie van doelgroepen. In A. E. Bronner, P. Dekker, J. C. Hoekstra, E. de Leeuw, T. Poiesz, K. de Ruyter, & A. Smidts (Eds.), Ontwikkelingen in het Marktonderzoek: Jaarboek MarktOnderzoeksAssociatie (pp. 163–175). Haarlem: Spaar en Hout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooimeijer, P., & Schutjens, V. (1991). Changing lifestyles and housing consumption: A longitudinal approach. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 6(2), 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hustad, P., & Pessemier, E. (1974). The development and application of psychographic life-style and associated activity and attitude measures. In W. Wells (Ed.), Life-style and psychographics (pp. 32–70). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbo. (2009 September). Nieuwsbrief Adviseurs, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, S. J. T., Coolen, H. C. C. H. (2010). What is the worth of lifestyle variables in the prediction of preferences for private and public green spaces? Working paper, presented at the 22nd conference of the European Network for Housing Research (ENHR), Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, L. R. (1983). Social values and social change: Adaptation to life in America. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersloot, J., & Kauko, T. (2004). Measurement of housing preferences–A comparison of research activity in the Netherlands and Finland. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 1, 144–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhans, R., & Elsinga, M. (2010). ‘Buy your home and feel in control’ does homeownership achieve the empowerment of former tenants of social housing? International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolpron Consultants and MarketResponse. (2000). Rapport Woonbeleving 2000. Amersfoort: The SmartAgent Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional-scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, W., & Reed, P. (1974). Lifestyle in environmental research. In C. Beattie & S. Crysdale (Eds.), Sociology Canada: Readings (pp. 406–419). Toronto: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. (1983). The nine American life styles. New York: Warner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhuis, M., & Schoemaker, R. (2002). Normen, waarden en woonbelevingsgroepen. Consumentenonderzoek van Motivaction. Stedebouw en Ruimtelijke Ordening, 6, 43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overboom, L. (2003). Tussen klant en stad. Cahier reeks Duurzame stedelijke vernieuwing (2(11)). KEI Kenniscentrum Stedelijke Vernieuwing en NIDO Programma Duurzame Stedelijke Vernieuwing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkster, F., & van Kempen, R. (2002). Leefstijlen en Woonmilieuvoorkeuren. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, Urban and Regional Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijndorp, A., Kompier, V., & de Haas, L. (Eds.). (1997). Wonen in de 21 e eeuw. Leefstijlen. Rotterdam: NAi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijndorp, A., Kompier, V., Metaal, S., Nio, I., & Truijens, B. (1998). Buitenwijk. Stedelijkheid op afstand. Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shevky, E., & Bell, W. (1955). Social area analysis. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1981). Lifestyle and social structure: Concepts, definitions, analyses. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • SRI International. (1989). VALS 2. Menio Park: SRI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, I., & Morgner, R. (1970). Life-style differences among urban and suburban blue-collar families. Social Forces, 48(3), 334–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urhahn Urban Design. (1999). Suburbaan wonen in de stad. Een onderzoek naar de kwaliteit en duurzaamheid van woonmilieus in Apeldoorn.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Lelij, B. (2002). Mentality: Vernieuwde normen- en-waardensegmentatie. eYe. Zicht Op Trends, 4(6/7), 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Schaaf, R. (2002). Leefstijlen en woonmilieus in de wijkvernieuwing. De Groninger methode. Stedebouw & Ruimtelijke Ordening, 6, 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Wouden, R., & Kullberg, J. (2002). Stijloefeningen. Leefstijlen in onderzoek en praktijk. Stedebouw & Ruimtelijke Ordening, 6, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Diepen, A. M. L., Arnoldus, M. (2003). De woonvraag in de vraaggestuurde markt. Bouwstenen uit het woonmilieuanalyse en leefstijlenonderzoek (rapport 23). Utrecht: DGW/Nethur partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Diepen, A., & Musterd, S. (2001). Stedelijke leefstijlen en woonmilieus in Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Amsterdam study centre for the Metropolitan Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Diepen, A. M. L., & Musterd, S. (2009). Lifestyles and the city. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24, 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Engelsdorp-Gastelaars, R. (1980). Niet elke stadsbewoner is een stedeling. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, Sociaal-Geografisch Instituut.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kralingen, R. (2003). Super brands. Merken en markten van morgen. Deventer: Samson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veal, A. J. (2000). Leisure and lifestyle: A review and annotated bibliography (Online Bibliography 8). Sydney: University of Technology, School of Leisure, Sport & Tourism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyncke, P. (2002). Lifestyle segmentation: From attitudes, interests and opinions, to values, aesthetic styles, life visions and media preferences. European Journal of Communication, 17, 445–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A. (2000). Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations (2nd ed.). Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W. (Ed.). (1974). Life-style and psychographics. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. The American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zablocki, B. D., & Kanter, R. M. (1976). The differentiation of life-styles. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 269–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Internet References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvia J. T. Jansen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1 Overview of Lifestyle Typologies, Especially with Regard to Housing

Appendix 1 Overview of Lifestyle Typologies, Especially with Regard to Housing

Author(s)

Domain

Name

Year

Lifestyle categories

Bastiaansen (1997)

Housing

Brabant ongemonteerd

1997

Villager, landscape dweller, yuppie, anarchist, traditional, principled, pleasure-lover, hypermobile, attached to one place, in lodgings, idealista

Bell (1958)

General

 

1958

Familism (a high valuation on family living), career (upward vertical mobility), consumership (striving for a high standard of living in the present)

De Bock and Decker (2009, Internet reference)

Interior

 

Around 2000

Design-lovers, party people, modern people, status people, sensitive people, respectable peoplea

Bourdieu (1979)

General

La distinction

1979

No specific categories. Two dimensions: (1) social-economic status and (2) the orientation of the resources

van Diepen and Musterd (2001)

Housing

 

2001

Four urban lifestyles: omni-urban lifestyle, economically necessary lifestyle, socially necessary lifestyle, non-necessary lifestylea

van Diepen and Musterd (2009)

Housing

 

2009

Five urban lifestyles: superurban households, economically urban households, socially urban households, nonurban households, retired households

Driessen and Beereboom (1983)

Housing

 

1983

Active, non-active, less active, youth, workers, practically and usefully oriented, vital-expansively orienteda

van Engelsdorp Gastelaars (1980)

Housing

 

1980

Reserved community members, unreserved community members, reserved city-dwellers, unreserved city-dwellersa

van der Flier Consultancy (2009, internet reference)

Housing

 

1998

Original urbanites, original villagers, new urbanites, new villagers, edge-city dwellers, suburbanites, immigrants

Fournier et al. (1992)

General

Nine consumption lifestyles

1992

Functionalists, nurturers, aspirers, experientials, succeeders, moral minority, golden years, sustainers, subsisters

Gans (1968)

Housing

 

1968

Cosmopolitans, singles and childless, ethnic villagers, deprived, trapped and downward mobile

Ganzeboom (1990)

Housing

Empirical example

1990

No specific categories. Three dimensions: (1) economical hierarchy, (2) cultural hierarchy, and (3) stage of life dimension.

Gemeente Groningen, dienst RO/EZ (van der Schaaf 2002)

Housing

Groninger methode

Around 2000

Students, singles (young employed; not much economically active), couples (double income no kids; not much economically active; traditional households; active older people), older people (active older people; older people focused on their surroundings), families with children (not much economically active with children; traditional families, double income with kids), single-parent familiesa

Haest (1989)

Housing

 

1989

The old guard, different sort, foreignersa

Inbo and I&O Research (2009, internet reference)

Housing

 

2001

Constructor, neighbor, traditional, partner, unattached, hypermobile, dynamic individualist, quiet luxurya

Inbo (2009)

Housing

Soulife lifestyles

Around 2009?

Individualist, intractable, hypermobile, consumerist, world citizen, opportunist, quiet enjoyer, traditional, principled, comfort-seeker, landscape dweller, villagera

Merton (1957)

General

 

1957

Locals, cosmopolitans

Mitchell (1983)

General

Values and lifestyle segmentation (VALS)

1978

Need-driven: survivors, sustainers. Outer-directed: belongers, emulators, achievers

Inner-directed: I-am-me’s, experientials, societally conscious. integrateds: self-integrated

Motivaction Marketing Organization (Nijhuis and Schoemaker 2002)

Housing

Segmentatie model

1999

Domestic types, community thinkers, down-to-earth family clan, active individualists, busy middle classes, tolerant socializers, settled idealists

Motivaction Marketing Organization (Van der Lelij 2002)

General

Mentality

2002

Postmodern hedonists, post materialists, upwardly mobile, cosmopolitans, new conservatives, modern middle class, traditional middle class, leisure group

NFO-Trendbox (2009, Internet reference)

General

Value box

1995

Goal-focused adventurers, sober philosophers, spiritual altruists, order and respectability, the center, uncomplicated pleasure-lovera

National Readership Survey (2009, internet reference)

Housing

Super profiles classification

2005

Affluent achievers, thriving grays, settled suburbans, nest builders, urban ventures, country life, senior citizens, producers, hard-pressed families, have-nots, unclassifiable

De Nieuwe Unie (Overboom 2003)

Housing

 

2003?

Survivors, Discoverers, neighborhood focused, dynamic individualists, well-to-do families, modal seniors, well-to-do seniorsa

Reijndorp et al. (1997)

Housing

 

1997

Uncertain existence: house as operating base, house as mobile home; rootless existence: Pied-à-terre, guesthouse; organized existence: combination household, network household; intractable existence: self-built paradise, do-it-yourself; shared existence: income neighborhoods, undivided city; recreational existence: outdoor city, holiday destinationa

Reijndorp et al. (1998)

Housing

 

1998

Dwellers in new estates: outer-district dwellers, original urbanites, new urbanites, villagers, suburbanites, nomadsa

de Rooij and Wallagh (2000)

Housing

 

2000

Urban professionals, hypermobiles, consumentists, active adults, city ecologists

Stuurgroep Experimenten Volkshuisvesting (2009, internet reference)

Housing

Woningatlas Consumentgericht Bouwen

1999

Villager, landscape dweller, yuppie, anarchist, traditionalist, principled, hypermobilea

Shevky and Bell (1955)

General

 

1955

Careerism, familism and consumerism

The SmartAgent Company (Kolpron Consultants and MarketResponse 2000)

Housing

 

2000

Dynamic individualists, free thinkers, community thinkers, entrenched, retiring group, quiet luxury

The SmartAgent Company (Hagen 2006)

General

Brand Strategy Research (BSR) model

2004

Red world, blue world, green world, yellow world

Sobel (1981)

General

Lifestyle and social structure

1981

No specific categories? Relationships between consumptive behavior and socio-demographic variables

SRI International (1989)

General

VALS 2

1989

Actualizers, strugglers, fulfilleds, achievers, experiencers, believers, strivers, makers

TNS NIPO (Hessing and Reuling 2003)

General

Waarden-segmenten in Nederland (WIN) model

Around 2003

Hedonists, business group, broad-minded group, commited group, caring group, conservatives, balanced group, luxury-seekers

Trendbox BV (in: Van Kralingen 2003)

General

 

1995

Modest social involvement, socially justified pleasure, concerned post-materialism, no-nonsense/dependent security, cultivated hedonism, self-conscious individualism, socially aware, religious altruisma

Urhahn Urban Design (1999)

Housing

 

1999

City-dweller, networker, dreamer, outdoors type, villager, do-er, comfort-based dweller, economically focused dweller, ostentatious dwellera

Value Group Ltd (2009, internet reference)

General

Insight value group scale

?

Self-actualizers, innovators, esteem-seekers, strivers, contented conformers, traditionalists, disconnected

Weber (1922)

General

 

1922

Divisions in society arising from class and status. Only illustrative examples of status groups are provided, no exhaustive categories

De Wijs-Mulkens (1999)

Housing

 

1999

No specific categories?

De Wijs-Mulkens and Ostendorf (2001)

Housing

 

2001

No specific categories?

Young and Rubicam (2009, internet reference)

General

Cross-cultural-consumer characterization (4Cs model)

?

Reformer, explorer, succeeder, aspirer, mainstreamer, struggler, resigned

Zablocki and Kanter (1976)

General

 

1976

Lifestyles determined by the economic system: property-dominated lifestyles, occupation-dominated lifestyles, and poverty-dominated lifestyles. Alternative lifestyles: regressive (hedonistic) lifestyles, etherealization lifestyles (spiritual, intellectual, monastic, and emotional lifestyles), community-based (ethnic lifestyle and communitarians), collective behavior–based lifestyles

Note: This table is not exhaustive as typologies may have been missed while studying the literature or new typologies might have emerged since. In general, typologies have been left out that were not developed specifically for use in the domain of housing. However, some general typologies have been included, because they have had such a large impact on lifestyle research in general. Finally, the table may contain flaws as it is very difficult to obtain the correct information. It just provides an indication of existing lifestyle typologies, especially with regard to housing.

aTranslated from Dutch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jansen, S.J.T. (2011). Lifestyle Method. In: Jansen, S., Coolen, H., Goetgeluk, R. (eds) The Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8894-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics