Skip to main content

Ethics Counseling: Philosophy of Medicine Counseling Instead of Medical Ethics Counseling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Philosophy and Practice of Medicine and Bioethics

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 47))

  • 1323 Accesses

Abstract

The philosophy of medicine is a critique of the concepts and methods of medicine. Ethics Committee often only represent the enculturated views of its members, often only reflect the morals of a society. Who would qualify to be on such a committee and what should be the requirements? This is not at all clear, not even dealt with. Medical ethics counseling is not enough when only dealing with certain bioethics directions like principlism, Kantian deontology, situational ethics, case method, etc. Philosophy of medicine counseling is asked for when dealing in depth with the theory and practice of medicine and bioethics.

Ethics Counseling: Philosophy of Medicine Counseling Instead of Medical Ethics Counseling

The art of morality is the practice of it, not rules laid down. [1]

† Deceased

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dewey, J. 1971. The study of ethics: A syllabus. The early works of John Dewey, 1889–1892, vol 4, 220–362, esp. IV:226. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sources: AMA “Guidelines for Ethics Committees in Health Care Institutions.” On the history of ethics commissions see Jonsen, A. 1998. The birth of bioethics, 362–367. New York: Oxford University Press; Electronic communications regarding Ethics Committees is being especially enhanced by the internet. Eiser, A. 2001. Electronic communication in ethics committees: Experience and challenges. Journal of Medical Ethics 27(suppl I):i30–i32. See also the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Society for Health Care and Human Values, American Medical Association, American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH See especially their “Core Concepts for Health Care Ethics Consultation,” etc.) See also the bioethics and philosophy of medicine journals and references in the bibliography. Eckstein, S. ed. 2003. Manual for research ethics committees, 6th edn. London: Centre for Medical Law and Ethics, Kings College; England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dorries, A. 2003. Mixed feelings: Physicians’ concerns about clinical ethics committees in Germany. HEC Forum 15:245–257; esp. 251–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorries, A. 2003. Mixed feelings: Physicians’ concerns about clinical ethics committees in Germany. HEC Forum 15:245–257; esp. 255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Benjamin, M. 1996. No consensus about consensus. Hastings Center Report 26:39–40; esp. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. Arras, J. 2002. Pragmatism and bioethics: Been there, done that. Social Philosophy and Public Policy 19:29–58; esp. 52–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sklansky, M. 2001. Neonatal euthanasia: Moral considerations and criminal liability. Journal of Medical Ethics 27:5–11; esp.8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fulford, K. 2001. Philosophy into practice: The case for ordinary-language philosophy. In Health, science and ordinary language, ed. Nordenfeldt, L., 171–208; esp.171 GA: Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fulford, K. 2001. Philosophy into practice: The case for ordinary-language philosophy. In Health, science and ordinary language. ed. Nordenfeldt, L., 171–208; esp.177, 201 GA: Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fulford, K. 2001. Philosophy into practice: The case for ordinary-language philosophy. In Health, science and ordinary language. ed. Nordenfeldt, L., 171–208; esp. 191ff GA: Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta; Hyman, M., Liponis, M. 2003. Ultraprevention. Scribner, New York: 326.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Singer, P. 2002. One world: The ethics of globalization, 62. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; Singer, P. 2002. Unsanctifying human life: Essays on ethics, ed. Kuhse, H., 62. Oxford: Blackwell; See also Maier, B. 2003. Das Vertraute und das Fremde in ethischer Perspektive. Das Vertraute und das Fremde als moralische Begriffe. In Psychosomatische Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, 291–296. Gießen: Beiträge der Jahrestagung 2002 der DGPFG, Psychosozial-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Caplan, A. 2006. No method. No madness. Hastings Center Report 36:12–13; esp.13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Such national ethics committees are found in Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Italy, Norway, Portugal, but not in others, e.g. Austria. Germany, Ireland, Netherlands (though the People's Health Council is similar). Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw, 163, 174. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maier, B. 2010. Moral und Ethik als kontextoffene Begriffe. Ethik transdisziplinär. In Rechtsphilosophie: Vom Grundlagenfach zur Transdisziplinarität in den Rechts-, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. eds. Wöhle, C.B., Augeneder, S., and Urnik, S., 205–216 Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Singer, P. 2002. Unsanctifying human life: Essays on ethics. ed. Kuhse, H., 64ff Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ross, J.W. 1986. Handbook for hospital ethics committees, 40. Chicago, IL: American Hospital Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tulsky, J., and Fox, E. 1996. Evaluating ethics consultation: Framing the questions. Journal of Clinical Ethics 7:109–115; esp.111.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Source: "American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation 1995": Report: Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation (ASBH 1966–1998). Adopted by the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities May, 8, 1998, which is also available on the internet) See also Aulisio, M., Arnold, R., and Youngner, S. eds. 2003. Health Care Ethics Consultation: Nature, goals, and competencies. American College of Physicians – American Society of Internal Medicine: 166–202. The task force includes 21 members and is sponsored by, for example, the American Medical Association, Society for Bioethics Consultation, the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities ASBH, etc.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aulisio, M., Arnold, R., and Youngner, S. eds. 2003. Health Care Ethics Consultation: Nature, Goals, and Competencies. American College of Physicians – American Society of Internal Medicine: 166–202 esp.:166 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aulisio, M., Arnold, R., and Youngner, S. eds. 2003. Health Care Ethics Consultation: Nature, Goals, and Competencies. American College of Physicians – American Society of Internal Medicine:166–202; esp. 171–173.

    Google Scholar 

  21. bka.gv.at/bioethik/ or http://www.bundeskanzleramt.at/bioethik/.

  22. Mittelstrass, J. 1991. Auf dem Wege zu einer Reparaturethik? In Ethik ohne Chance? Erkundungen im technologischen Zeitalter. Ethik in den Wissenschaften 2. eds. Wils, J.P., and Mieth, D. Tübingen: Attempto.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gawande, A. 2002. Complications: A surgeon`s notes on imperfect science, 42. New York: Picador/Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Medical Ethics Today: The BMA'S handbook of ethics and law. 2004, 2nd edn. London: BMJ (Also Windows CD ROM) .

    Google Scholar 

  25. Munson, R. 2000. Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in medical ethics, 6th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Munson, R. 2000. Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in medical ethics, 6th edn, 32. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Munson, R. 2000. Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in medical ethics, 6th edn, 34. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Munson, R. 2000. Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in medical ethics, 6th edn, 36. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Munson, R. 2000. Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in medical ethics, 6th edn, 37. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Munson, R. 2000. Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in medical ethics, 6th edn. 38. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Munson, R. 2000. Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in medical ethics, 6th edn, 40. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 357, 56. Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Beauchamp, T., and Childress, J. orig. 1979–2001/1994. Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol. II Partners` Research, 50. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  36. In Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol. II Partners` Research, 38. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Smith, W. 2000. Culture of death: The assault on medical ethics in America. Encounter Books, San Francisco, CA: 30.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 25. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hippocrates Precepts IX 1952. Jones, W. vol 2 Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Loewy, R. 2000. Integrity and personhood: Looking at patients from a bio/psycho/social perspective, 53. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jonsen, A., Siegler, M., and Winsdale, W. orig. 1982/1998. Clinical ethics, 4th edn, 51. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Beauchamp, T., and Walters, L. eds. 1999. Contemporary issues in bioethics, 5th edn, 19, 20. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Noddings, N. 2002. Starting at home: Caring and social policy, 109. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Noddings, N. 2002. Starting at home: Caring and social policy, 114. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jopling, D. 1996. Philosophical counseling, truth and self-interpretation. Journal of Applied Philosophy 13:297–309; esp. 304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Loewy, R. 2000. Integrity and personhood: Looking at patients from a bio/psycho/social perspective, 48. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kant, I. 1785/1998. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. ed. Gregor, M. New York: Cambridge University Press; Kant, I. 1788/1997. Critique of practical reason. Gregor, M. tr, New York: Cambridge University Press; Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 18. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 32. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 34. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 359. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 35. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 365. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 36. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 31. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 40. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 32. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 325. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 363. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 37. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 359. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 61. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 39. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 58–61. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  64. cf. Nussbaum, M. 1990. Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. New York: Oxford University Press; Brody, H. 1987. Stories of sickness. New Haven: Yale University Press; Frank, A. 1995. The wounded storyteller: Body, illness and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; Nelson, H. 1997. Stories and their limits: Narrative approaches to bioethics. New York: Routledge. Compare also the notion of "communicative rationality" by Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 334 He proposes a domination-free situation of dialogues.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Arras, J. 2002. Pragmatism and bioethics: Been there, done that. Social Philosophy and Public Policy 19:29–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tong, R. 1998. The ethics of care: A feminist virtue ethics of care for healthcare practitioners. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23:131–152; esp.133.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Schapp, W. 1953. In Geschichten verstrickt. Wiesbaden: Zum Sein von Mensch und Ding.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Elliott, C. 1999. Bioethics, culture and identity: A philosophical disease, 123. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Galzigna, M. 2004. Aspects of medical practice: Insight from narrative theory, and Changing narratives, changing through narratives. Internet papers. (Presentation at the International Conference on Philosophical Practice, Copenhagen, August 3rd–6th, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wittgenstein, L. 1953/1968. Philosophical investigations, 3rd edn. New York: Macmillan. Tr. Rev. Anscombe, E., 7, 240, 23Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Bachmann, G., On his website: Wer seine Sprache ändert, der ändert auch sein Denken und Empfinden. Stuttgart, bachmann@textuniversum.de.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 45. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ryle, G. 1949. Concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 38. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 45. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 361. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 56. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 450. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Apel, H.O. 1988. Diskurs und verantwortung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 47. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 50. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Dewey, J. 1920. Reconstruction in philosophy. In The middle works 1899–1924. ed. Boydston, J.A., vol 12, 176. Carbondale, IL: Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kelsen, H. 1945. General theory of law and state. Tr. Wedberg, A., Cambridge, M.A., and Kelsen, H. 1967. Pure theory of law. Knight, M. tr., 2nd rev. edn. Berkeley: University of California Press; Kelsen, H. 1957/1971. What is justice? Tr. Knight, M., 2nd rev. edn. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Dewey, J. 1920. Reconstruction in philosophy. In The middle works 1899–1924, ed. Boydston, J.A., vol 12, 211 Carbondale, IL: Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Wittgenstein, L. 1969. On certainty. eds. Anscombe, G., and Wright, G. , #139. Anscombe, G., Paul, D. trs, New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Justice Posner, R. in Dickstein, M. ed. 1999. The revival of pragmatism, 236–253. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Dewey, J. 1934. A common faith, 26. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 313. Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 312. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Noddings, N. 2002. Starting at home: Caring and social policy, 232. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 313. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 319. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Jonsen, A., and Toulmin, S. 1988. Abuse of casuistry: A short history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Kilner, J. 1990. Who lives? Who dies? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kilner, J. 1990. Who lives? Who dies?, 109 New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Reiter-Theil, S. 2001. The Freiburg approach to ethics consultation: Process, outcome and competencies. Journal of Medical Ethics 27(suppl I): i21–i23; esp. i21—i22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Arras, J. 2002. Pragmatism and bioethics: Been there, done that. Social Philosophy and Public Policy 19:29–58; esp. 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Fletcher, J. 1995. Introduction to clinical ethics. ed. Frederick, M.D., 266. London: University Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  99. cf. Arras, J. 2002. Pragmatism and bioethics: Been there, done that. Social Philosophy and Public Policy 19:29–58; esp. 52–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Nussbaum, M., and Sen, A. eds 1993. Quality of life, 51–52. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Dewey, J. 1971. Moral theory and practice. The early works of John Dewey. 1889–1892, vol III, 93–109; 106. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Dewey, J. 1922. Human nature and conduct, 211. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Fletcher, J., and Brody, H. 1994. Clinical ethics. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, ed. Reich, W., Vol I, , 399–404; esp. 399 New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Little, M. 1995. Humane medicine, 26. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Jonsen, A., and Toulmin, S. 1988. Abuse of casuistry: A short history of moral reasoning, 13. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Jonsen, A., and Toulmin, S. 1988. Abuse of casuistry: A short history of moral reasoning, 342–343. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Jonsen, A., and Toulmin, S. 1988. Abuse of casuistry: A short history of moral reasoning, 294. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Beauchamp, T., and Walters, L. eds. 1999. Contemporary issues in bioethics, 5th edn, 17. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Beauchamp, T., and Walters, L. eds. 1999. Contemporary issues in bioethics, 5th edn, 18. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Schwartz, L., Preece, P., and Hendry, R. 2002. Medical ethics: A case-based approach, 5. Edinburgh: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Kilner, J. 1990. Who lives? Who dies?, 70 New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Tomlinson T 1994. Casuistry in medical ethics rehabilitated, or repeat offender? Theoretical Medicine 15:5–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Tomlinson T 1994. Casuistry in medical ethics rehabilitated, or repeat offender? Theoretical Medicine 15:5–20; esp. 13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Tomlinson T 1994. Casuistry in medical ethics rehabilitated, or repeat offender? Theoretical Medicine 15:5–20; esp. 14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Fletcher, J. 1966/1997. Situational ethics: The new morality, esp. 57. Louisville, KY: Westminster Knox Press, Fletcher, J., and Brody, H. 1994. Clinical ethics. In Encyclopedia of bioethics. ed. Reich, W., vol I, 399–404. New York: Macmillan; Shibles, W. 1978. Rational love. Whitewater, WI: Language Press.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Sartre, J. 1992. Notebooks for an ethics. Pellauer, D. tr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Emanuel, E. 1995. Medical ethics in the era of managed care: The need for institutional structures instead of principles for individual cases. Journal of Clinical Ethics 6:335–338; esp. 335.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Emanuel, E. 1995. Medical ethics in the era of managed care: The need for institutional structures instead of principles for individual cases. Journal of Clinical Ethics 6:335–338; esp.337.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Dewey, J. 1922. Human nature and conduct, 211. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Dewey, J. 1909. Moral principles in education, 57. New York: Houghton Miflin.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Schneider, S. 2005. The patient from hell: How I worked with my doctor to get the best of modern medicine and how You can too, 260. New York: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Schneider, S. 2005. The patient from hell: How I worked with my doctor to get the best of modern medicine and how You can too, 258. New York: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Jonsen, A., and Toulmin, S. 1988. Abuse of casuistry: A short history of moral reasoning, 330. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Wittgenstein, L. 1953/1958. Philosophical investigations, 3rd edn. New York: Macmillan; Elliott, C. 1999. Bioethics, culture and identity: A philosophical disease. New York (Wittgensteinian approach): Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Nordenfelt, L. 2001. Health, science and ordinary language, 171–208. Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  126. cf. Jonsen, A., Siegler, M., and Winsdale, W. orig.1982/1998. Clinical ethics, 4th edn, 10. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  127. cf. Jonsen, A., Siegler, M., and Winsdale, W. orig.1982/1998. Clinical ethics, 4th edn, 19. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Maier, B., Akmanlar-Hirscher, G., Krainz, R., Wenger, A., and Staudach, A. 1999. Der chronische Unterbauchschmerz – ein immer noch zu wenig verstandenes Krankheitsbild. In Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 149/13:377–382.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Canton, R. 1980. Wholistic medicine: Reactivation of an old aspiration. Western Journal of Medicine 133:171–172.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Smuts`s J 1926. Holism and evolution. See internet. Ethical counsel ch.

    Google Scholar 

  131. See Shibles, W. 1995. Analysis of the definitions of Humanism. Scottish Journal of Religious Studies 16:51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Smuts’s, J. 1926. Holism and evolution. See internet. Ethical counsel ch: 547.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Smuts’s, J. 1926. Holism and evolution. See internet. Ethical counsel ch: 549.

    Google Scholar 

  134. For concrete hands-on methods see Shibles "Humor" internet site 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Gordon, J. 1982. Holistic medicine: Advances and shortcomings. Western Journal of Medicine 136:546–551.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Medical Ethics Manual. 2005. World Medical Association. Ferney-Voltaire Cedex, France 2005:18.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Medical Ethics Manual. 2005. World Medical Association. Ferney-Voltaire Cedex, France 2005:75.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Hyman, M., and Liponis, M. 2003. Ultraprevention, 325. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Hyman, M., and Liponis, M. 2003. Ultraprevention, 324–325. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Sept. 2006 letter to subscribers.

    Google Scholar 

  141. holisticmedicine.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  142. WHO 1948, 191 state memberships; Yach, D. 1998. Health and illness: The definition of the World Health Organization. Ethik in der Medizin: 7–13; esp. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Yach, D. 1998. Health and illness: The definition of the World Health Organization. Ethik in der Medizin: 7–13; esp. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Tulsky, J., and Fox, E. 1996. Evaluating ethics consultation: Framing the questions. Journal of Clinical Ethics 7:109–115; esp. 110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Nussbaum, M., and Sen, A. eds. 1993. Quality of life, 64. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Arras, J. 2002. Pragmatism and bioethics: Been there, done that. Social Philosophy and Public Policy 19:29–58; esp. 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Fletcher, J. ed. 1995. Introduction to clinical ethics, 264. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group; For example: Arras, J. 2002. Pragmatism and bioethics: Been there, done that. Social Philosophy and Public Policy 19:29–58; esp. 29; Miller, F., Fins, J., and Bacchetta, M. 1996. Clinical pragmatism: John Dewey and Clinical Ethics. Journal of Contemporary Health, Law and Policy 13:27–51; Keulartz, J., Korthals, M., Schermer, M., and Swierstra, T. eds. 2003. Pragmatist ethics for a technological culture. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer; McGee, G. ed. 1994/2003. Pragmatic bioethics, TN. 2nd edn.: Cambridge, MA: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Moreno, J. 1995. Deciding together: Bioethics and moral consensus. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Engelhardt, H.T. 2002. The ordination of bioethicists as secular moral experts. Social Philosophy and Policy 19:59–82; esp. 82 .

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Arras, J. 2002. Pragmatism and bioethics: Been there, done that. Social Philosophy and Public Policy 19:29–58; esp. 41 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Dewey, J. 1922. Human nature and conduct. New York: Henry Holt; Dewey, J., and Tufts, J. 1932. Ethics. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Schweitzer, A. 1990/1923. Kultur und Ethik, 311. München: Beck’sche Reihe; Nicht Lebensverneinung an sich, sondern nur das, was im Dienste von Weltbejahung steht und in ihr zweckmässig wird, ist ethisch.

    Google Scholar 

  153. Engelhardt, H.T. 1991. Bioethics and secular humanism: The search for a common morality, 138. London: SCM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  154. For a recent article defining humanism, see Shibles, W. 1995. Analysis of the Definitions of Humanism. Scottish Journal of Religious Studies 16:51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  155. Lahav, R., and Tillmanns, M. eds. 1995. Essays on philosophical counseling, Ch. 4. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  156. Schweitzer, A. 1966. Die Ehrfurcht vor dem Leben. Reverence for life. Grundtexte aus fünf Jahrzehnten. Basic texts from five dedcades, ed. Bähr, H.W., 8th edn, 65. München: CH Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Lenk, H. 1998. Konkrete Humanität. Vorlesungen über Verantwortung und Menschlichkeit, 90 ff. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp TB Wissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Smith, W. 2000. Culture of death: The assault on medical ethics in America, 7. San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Braddock, C., and Tonelli, M. 2001. Too much ethics, not enough medicine: Clarifying the role of clinical expertise for the clinical ethics consultant. Journal of Clinical Ethics 12:24–30; esp. 25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Braddock, C., and Tonelli, M. 2001. Too much ethics, not enough medicine: Clarifying the role of clinical expertise for the clinical ethics consultant. Journal of Clinical Ethics 12:24–30; esp. 29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Davies, L., and Hudson, L. 1999. Why don`t physicians use ethics consultation? Journal of Clinical Ethics 10:116–125; esp.119.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. Davies, L., and Hudson, L. 1999. Why don`t physicians use ethics consultation? Journal of Clinical Ethics 10:116–125; esp.121.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Davies, L., and Hudson, L. 1999. Why don`t physicians use ethics consultation? Journal of Clinical Ethics 10:116–125; esp.122.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. Fletcher, J., and Brody, H. 1994. Clinical ethics. In Encyclopedia of bioethics. ed. Reich, W., Vol I: 399–404; esp.400 New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Dewey, J. 1939. Theory of valuation, 32. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  166. Dewey, J. 1971. Moral theory and practice. The early works of John Dewey. 1889–1892, vol. III, 93–109; esp.100. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  167. Clayton, C. 1996. The Practice of philosophical enquiry as a therapeutic experience (PETE), Face to Face Dasein. (logos@facetoface.org.uk) Owl of Minerva Publications, available on the Internet.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Hoogendijk, A. 1988. Spreekuur Bij Een Filosoof, Ceen, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  169. Veening, E. 1987. Monolog, Dialoog en Metaloog. Filosofische Praktijk 2:19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Wittgenstein, L. 1953 orig./1968 3rd edn. Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  171. Kristeva, Z. 1995. Philosophical counseling: Bridging the narrative rift. Society for Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2:23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  172. Prins-Bakker in: Lahav, R., Tillmanns, M. eds 1995. Essays on philosophical counseling, 135. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  173. Lahav, R., and Tillmanns, M. eds. 1995. Essays on philosophical counseling, Ch. 4. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  174. Schefczyk in: Lahav, R., and Tillmanns, M. eds. 1995. Essays on philosophical counseling, 126. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  175. Dewey, J. orig. 1938/1964. The theory of inquiry. Rinehart and Winston, New York: Holt. See also Shibles, W. 1978. Teaching ethics and emotions in the schools. Confluent Education Journal 8: 30–34; Shibles, W. 1980. Ethics as a science: Going from is to ought. Iowa Science Teachers Journal 3:26–32 (Includes critique of L Kohlberg); Shibles, W. 1974. Ethics as open-context terms. In Wittgenstein, language and philosophy, ed. Shibles W.. Rev. 3rd edn. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall-Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  176. Shibles, W. 1974. Emotion: The method of philosophical therapy, 492. Whitewater, WI: Language Press; Shibles, W. 1994. Anxiety: A pseudo-concept. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 9:43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  177. Raabe, P. 2001. Philosophical counseling: Theory and practice, 226. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Wittgenstein, L. 1968. Philosophical investigations, 3rd edn, 133. New York: Macmillan,. The subtitle of Shibles' work: Shibles, W. 1974. Emotion: The Method of Philosophical Therapy. Whitewater, WI: Language Press, also shows the stress on philosophy as therapy..

    Google Scholar 

  179. Peterman, J. 1992. Philosophical Therapy: An introduction and defense of Wittgenstein's later philosophical project. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 147–279. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  181. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol. I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law, Austria: Hans Kelsen (philosophy of law), "Biolaw and bioethics in Austria are marked by a pragmatic positivistic legal tradition." "Bioethics has been dominated by a Catholic position…In opposition to this approach medical science advocates medical progress and scientific medicine as the basis of bioethics." Kant's ethics, humanistic philosophy of the Greens. Belgium: Catholic domination of ethics committees, Anti-Catholic pluralism, Emmanual Mounier (personalist), critics of American principlist approach. Denmark: Alf Ross, philosopher of law, humanistic philosophy of the Greens Party. Marxism, utilitarianism, phenomenology, Protestant influence. Finland: Singer's consequentialism and the American principlist philosophy (Beauchamp and Childress) France: Philosophers: Maine de Brian Bergson, Hans Jonas, Kant, Merleau-Ponty, Paul Ricoeur, Sartre, Levinas. Phenomenology. Strong Catholic influence. Germany: Utilitarian, Hans Jonas, Heidegger, Habermas, Kant, American Principlism, humanistic philosophy of the Greens Party. Italy: Catholic vs. secular bioethics, American principlism, personalism combined with Catholicism, Emmanual Mounier (personalist), Merleau-Ponty, Abompiani, D'Agostino, Catholic opposition to consequentialism and utilitarianism. "There is general disorientation caused by huge contradictions between the Catholic Church and secular modern Italy." Netherlands: Humanistic tradition. Norway: Strong Lutherianism, Kant, Hans Jonas, utilitarianism, French philosophy, Arne Naess, K-E Tranøy (principlism) Spain: Utilitarianism, consequentialism, rights based as by Rawls, Dworkin, Victoria Camps. Sweden: Knut-Erik Tranøy introduced the four principles approach, ordinary language approach of Wittgenstein, pragmatism.

    Google Scholar 

  182. Smith, W. 2000. Culture of death: The assault on medical ethics in America, 25. San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  183. Singer, P. 2002. One world: The ethics of globalization, 63. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  184. Hosford, B. 1986. Bioethics committees: The healthcare provider`s guide, 85. Rockwell, MD: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  185. Fletcher, J. 1995. Introduction to medical ethics, 264. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  186. Hosford, B. 1986. Bioethics Committees: The healthcare provider`s guide, 86. Rockwell, MD: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  187. Hendrick, J. 1986. Legal aspects of clinical ethics committees. Journal of Medical Ethics 27: i50–i53; esp. i52–i53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Aulisio, M., Arnold, R., and Youngner, S. 2000 Internet. Health care ethics consultation: Nature, goals, and competencies. American College of Physicians American Society of Internal Medicine; See also Aulisio, M., Arnold, R., and Youngner, S. eds. 2003. Ethics consultation: From theory to practice. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press; Benatar, D. ed. 2004. Life, death, and meaning: Key philosophical readings on the big questions, 841–847. Lanham, MD II: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  189. Prins-Bakker in Lahav, R., and Tillmanns, M. eds. 1995. Essays on philosophical counseling. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 38, ch 10; Hoogendijk, A. 1988. Spreekuur Bij Een Filosoof, Ceen, Utrecht: Ch 12.

    Google Scholar 

  190. Lahav, R., and Tillmanns, M. eds. 1995. Essays on philosophical counseling, 38, Ch 9. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  191. Paden, R. 1998. Defining philosophical counseling. International Journal of Philosophy 12:1–17, see also Shibles, W. 1974. Emotion. The method of philosophical therapy. Whitewater, WI: Language Press.

    Google Scholar 

  192. Marks, J. ed. 1986. The ways of desire, 3. Chicago: Precedent.

    Google Scholar 

  193. Jopling, D. 1996. Philosophical Counseling, truth and self-interpretation. Journal of Applied Philosophy 13:297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 35. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  195. Rendtorff, J., and Kemp, P. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol I Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability, 50. Copenhagen, Barcelona: Centre for Bioethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Maier .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maier, B., Shibles†, W.A. (2011). Ethics Counseling: Philosophy of Medicine Counseling Instead of Medical Ethics Counseling. In: The Philosophy and Practice of Medicine and Bioethics. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 47. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8867-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8867-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8866-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8867-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics