Advertisement

Philosophy and Ethics of the Body

  • Barbara MaierEmail author
  • Warren A. Shibles†
Chapter
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 47)

Abstract

The medical system as part of culture is based on culture and morals, and so are the concepts of the body. Man has a body and is his/her body at the same time. Plessner called it the “excentricity of man,” the double aspect of one’s existence as body and as “Leib.” The latter is being one’s body in all dimensions conceivable, living to the full, stressing social relations, communication and exchange. Body language is expressing the body, implies language, is “leibhaftig”, language embodied. It is narrative medicine of bodies. One can speak of the personally understood body in relationships, as one’s own body, as the body of a beloved person, a person you care for (as a mother for her child, a physician for his patient, etc.), the body of every human person.

Keywords

Body person paradigms of the body self selves body language personality the un-philosophical body the philosophical body Leib ethics of the body 

References

  1. 1.
    Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought, 3. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dewey, J. 1929/1958. Experience and nature, 322. La Salle, IL: Open Court; New York: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical investigations, 3rd edn. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanson, N. 1958/1961. Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schweitzer, A. 1923/1996. Kultur und Ethik. Beck’sche Reihe, München: 338 Mit drei Gegnern hat sich die Ethik auseinander zu setzen: Mit der Gedankenlosigkeit, mit der egoistischen Selbstbehauptung und mit der Gesellschaft. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fletcher, J. 1979. Humanhood: Essays in biomedical ethics, 91. New York: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schweitzer, A. 1923/1996. Kultur und Ethik, 314. München: Beck’sche Reihe.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dewey, J., and Tufts, J. 1932. Ethics, 288. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schweitzer, A. 1923/1996. Kultur und Ethik. Beck’sche Reihe, München: 351 ff. Cf. Maier, B. 2005. Unsere Empfindsamkeit für und unsere Sorge um das Leben von Menschen auf dem Hintergrund moderner Biotechnologien. In Leben nach Maß – zwischen Machbarkeit und Unantastbarkeit. Biotechnologie im Licht des Denkens von Albert Schweitzer 2005. ed. Schüz, G. Beiträge zur Albert – Schweitzer – Forschung, vol 10, , 115–142. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag. www.bundeskanzleramt.at/bioethik/Detail: http://www.bka.gv.at/Docs/2006/4/3/BMaier_Schuz.pdf.
  10. 10.
    Nietzsche, F. 1967. The will to power, 221. Trs. Kaufmann, W., and Hollingdale, R. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dewey, J. 1939. Theory of valuation, 29. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kossek, E., and Block, R. 2000. Managing human resources in the 21st century: From core concepts to strategic choice, 276. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chomsky, N. 2001. War against people. Menschenrechte und Schurkenstaaten. Wien: Europa Verlag, Hamburg. (Rogue States, The Rule of Force in World Affairs. By Diane Chomsky. Irrevocable Trust.)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ryle, G. 1984/1949. Concept of mind, 27. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elliott, C. 1999. Bioethics, culture and identity: A philosophical disease. New York: Routledge; Cf. Elliott, C. 1996. The rules of insanity: Moral responsibility and the mentally ill offender. Albany: State University of New York of New York Press; Elliott, C. ed. 2001. Slow cures and bad philosophers: Essays on Wittgenstein, medicine, and bioethics. Durham: Duke University Press; Elliott, C. 2003. Better than well: American medicine meets the American dream. New York: W Norton.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kass, L. 2003. Beyond Therapy. Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. A Report by the President’s Council on Bioethics. New York: Regan Books.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sontag, S. 1981. Krankheit als Metapher. Fischer TB, Frankfurt am Main; orig. Illness as metaphor, 5. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maier, B., and Wenger, A. 2009. Zur Bedeutung der gynäkologischen Anamnese für die Arzt/In-Patientin-Beziehung. Balint 10:48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brody 1987. Stories of sickness, 4, 50, 59. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bauer, J. 2006. Warum ich fühle, was du fühlst. Intuitive Kommunikation und das Geheimnis der Spiegelneurone. München: Wilhelm Heyne Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Butler, J. 1991. Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter, 205. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pieper, A. 1998. Gibt es eine feministische Ethik?, 85 München: UTB, W Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rheinz, H. 1995. Das andere Gesicht. In Kursbuch 119 – Verteidigung des Körpers, 117–132 esp.117–120. Berlin: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Purdy, L.M. 1990. Are pregnant women fetal containers? In Bioethics 4:273–291. Reprinted In Bioethics. An anthology 2006. eds. Kuhse, H., and Singer, P., 2nd edn, 65–75. Malden, Oxford Carlton: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katz-Rothman, B. 1995/1989. On surrogacy. (Orig. Recreating motherhood: Ideology and technology in a patriarchal society) In Ethical issues in modern medicine. eds. Hunt, R., Arras, J.D., and Steinbock, B. 4th edn, 472–479. Mountain View/California, London, Toronto: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schindele, E. 1992. Gläserne Gebär-Mütter. Vorgeburtliche Diagnostik – Fluch oder Segen? Frankfurt am Main: Fischer TB.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duden, B. 1994. Der Frauenleib als öffentlicher Ort. Vom Missbrauch des Begriffs Leben. dtv, München.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Duden, B. 1994. Der Frauenleib als öffentlicher Ort. Vom Missbrauch des Begriffs Leben. dtv, München: 129.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Plessner, H. 1970. Philosophische Anthropologie. ed. Dux, G., 47ff Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cf. Leiben und leben: Boss, M., Condrau, G., and Hicklin, A. 1977. Leiben und leben. Beiträge zur Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie. Bern: Benteli.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wiplinger, F. 1984. Der personal verstandene Tod. (The Personally Understood Death.) Todeserfahrung als Selbsterfahrung, 2nd edn. Freiburg im Breisgau: Alber. Out of print.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moltmann-Wendel, E. 1994. Mein Körper bin ich, 133. Gütersloh: Neue Wege zur Leiblichkeit.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsParacelsus Medical University SALKSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.University of Wisconsin–WhitewaterWhitewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations