Skip to main content

Applying the Optimum Index Factor to Multiple Data Types in Soil Survey

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL,volume 2))

Abstract

Digital soil mapping requires simple, straight-forward methods that can be easily implemented into daily activities of soil survey. The Optimum Index Factor (OIF) was developed by Chavez et al. (1982, 1984) as a method for determining the three-band combination that maximizes the variability in a particular multispectral scene. The OIF is based on the amount of total variance and correlation within and between all possible band combinations in the dataset. Although the OIF method was developed for Landsat TM data, the concept and methodology are applicable to any multilayer dataset. We used the OIF method in a subset area of the initial soil survey of the Duchesne Area, Utah, USA, to help determine which combination of data layers would be most useful for modeling soil distribution. Unique multiband images created from layers of multiple data types (elevation and remote sensing derivatives) were evaluated using the OIF method to determine which data layers would maximize the biophysical variability in the study area. A multiband image was created from the optimum combinations of data layers and used for classification and modeling in ERDAS Imagine. The output from the classification and modeling are being evaluated as pre-maps for soil mapping activities in the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amen, A., and Blaszczynski, J., 2001. Integrated Landscape Analysis, pp. 2–20. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center,Denver, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven, K.J., and Kirby, M.J., 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin 24(1):43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettinger, J.L., Ramsey, R.D., Bodily, J.M., Cole, N.J., Kienast-Brown, S., Nield, S.J., Saunders, A.M., and Stum, A.K., 2008. Landsat spectral data for digital soil mapping. pp. 193–202. In: Haremink, A., McBratney, A.B., and de Lourdes Mendonça-Santos, M., (eds.), Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data. Springer, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, P.S., 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections—revisited and revised. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62(9):1025–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, P.S., Berlin, G.L., and Sowers, L.B., 1982. Statistical method for selecting Landsat MSS ratios. Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering 8(1):23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, P.S., Guptill, S.C., and Bowell, J.A., 1984. Image processing techniques for Thematic Mapper data. Proceedings, ASPRS Technical Papers 2:728–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, N.J., and Boettinger, J.L., 2007. Pedogenic understanding raster classification methodology for mapping soils, Powder River Basin, Wyoming, USA. pp. 377–388. In: Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A.B., and Voltz, M., (eds.), Digital Soil Mapping: An introductory perspective. Developments in Soil Science Vol. 31, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., 2004a. Compound Topographic Index AML. http://arcscripts.esri.com/details.asp?dbid=11863 (last verified September 8 2008).

  • Evans, J., 2004b. Topographic Ruggedness Index AML. http://arcscripts.esri.com/details.asp?dbid=12435 (last verified September 8 2008).

  • Howell, D., Kim, Y.G., and Haydu-Houdeshell, C.A., 2008. Development and application of digital soil mapping within traditional soil survey: What will it grow into? pp. 43–52. In: Hartemink, A., McBratney, A.B., and de Lourdes Mendonça-Santos, M. (eds.), Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data. Springer, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D., Kim, Y.G., Haydu-Houdeshell, C.A, Clemmer, P., Almaraz, R., and Ballmer, M., 2007. Fitting soil property spatial distribution models in the Mojave Desert for digital soil mapping. pp. 465–476. In: Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A.B., and Voltz, M. (eds.), Digital Soil Mapping: An introductory perspective. Developments in Soil Science Vol. 31, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Intermountain Region Digital Image Archive Center., 2008. Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project. http://earth.gis.usu.edu/swgap/index.html (last verified 22 September 2008).

  • Jenny, H., 1941. Factors of Soil Formation. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J.R., 2005. Introductory Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienast-Brown, S., and Boettinger, J.L., 2007. Land cover classification from Landsat imagery for mapping dynamic wet and saline soils. pp. 235–244. In: Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A.B., and Voltz, M. (eds.), Digital Soil Mapping: An introductory perspective. Developments in Soil Science Vol. 31, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney, A.B., Mendonça Santos, M.L., and Minasny, B., 2003. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117:3–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nield, S.J., Boettinger, J.L., and Ramsey, R.D., 2007. Digitally mapping gypsic and natric soil areas using landsat ETM data. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71(1):245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, S.J., DeGloria, S.D., and Elliot, R., 1999. A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain Journal of Sciences 5:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, A.M., and Boettinger, J.L., 2007. Incorporating classification trees into a pedogenic understanding raster classification methodology, Green River Basin, Wyoming, USA. pp. 389–400. In: Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A.B., and Voltz, M. (eds.), Digital Soil Mapping: An Introductory Perspective. Developments in Soil Science Vol. 31, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kienast-Brown .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kienast-Brown, S., Boettinger, J. (2010). Applying the Optimum Index Factor to Multiple Data Types in Soil Survey. In: Boettinger, J.L., Howell, D.W., Moore, A.C., Hartemink, A.E., Kienast-Brown, S. (eds) Digital Soil Mapping. Progress in Soil Science, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8863-5_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics