Skip to main content

Inverse Meta-modelling of Yield-Monitor Data for Estimating Soil-Available Water-Holding Capacities at a Farm Resolution of 10 m

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Proximal Soil Sensing

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL))

Abstract

Spatially dense, geo-referenced information is an integral component of precision agriculture (PA) management. Moreover, the value of temporally dense information is gaining recognition. An example of such valuable information is crop yield data. An intuitively appealing response to these information requirements is simulation modelling. In order to meet the temporal density and the spatial extent requirements of PA, simulation modelling is faced with a major challenge: that of capturing yield variation at a spatial resolution relevant to PA. Adequate computer power to run a representative number of simulations (>1,000) and suitable information to populate the models are the motivating challenges behind this study. Inverse meta-models were derived from the agricultural production simulator (APSIM) using neural network modelling to predict soil-available water capacity (AWC). Using as many years of yield data as was available for a dryland grain farm in Australia, ‘effective’ AWC maps with a resolution of 10 m were made by averaging maps estimated from different yield years. The AWC values were validated in terms of value for predicting spatially variable yield. The AWC maps were significantly different, depending on the year of yield data used. This demonstrated that the ‘effective’ component of the AWC values contains information about climate interacting with the soil, the crop, and the landscape. The AWC values proved useful for predicting yield using simple linear models (0.48 < R 2 < 0.80) rather than using APSIM. A conclusion from this study is that the inverse meta-modelling concept is an efficient way of extracting soil physical information that exists within crop yield maps. Further research attempting to enhance understanding about the ‘effective’ components of the AWC values and to improve the temporal consistence of the AWC values is important. A greater number of AWC scenarios, more years of yield data, and the inclusion of additional information into the meta-models are possible ways forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • FAO (1998) World reference base for soil resources. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Irmak A, Batchelor WD, Jones JW, Irmak S, Paz JO, Beck HW, Egeh M (2002) Relationship between plant available soil water and yield for explaining soybean yield variability. Appl Eng Agric 18:471–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey SJ, Carter JO, Moodie KB, Beswick AR (2001) Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data. Environ Model Softw 16:309–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL, Probert ME, Robertson MJ, Holzworth D, Huth NI, Hargreaves JNG, Meinke H, Hochman Z, McLean G, Verburg K, Snow V, Dimes JP, Silburn M, Wang E, Brown S, Bristow KL, Asseng S, Chapman S, McCown RL, Freebairn DM, Smith CJ (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. Eur J Agron 18:267–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleignen JP, Sargent RJ (2000) A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation. Eur J Operat Res 120:14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan CLS, Norman JM, Lowery B (2003) Estimating plant-available water across a field with an inverse yield model. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:620–629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timlin D, Pachepsky Y, Walthall C, Loechel S (2001) The use of a water budget model and yield maps to characterize water availability in a landscape. Soil Tillage Res 58:219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong MT, Asseng S (2006) Determining the causes of spatial and temporal variability of wheat yields at sub-field scale using a new method of upscaling a crop model. Plant Soil 283:203–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Grains Research and Development Corporation for funding this work and Malcolm Sargent for providing his farm as a study site and the yield-monitor data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.J. Florin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Florin, M., McBratney, A., Whelan, B. (2010). Inverse Meta-modelling of Yield-Monitor Data for Estimating Soil-Available Water-Holding Capacities at a Farm Resolution of 10 m. In: Viscarra Rossel, R., McBratney, A., Minasny, B. (eds) Proximal Soil Sensing. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8859-8_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics