Skip to main content

Abstract

An introduction to the ethical issues surrounding the value of farms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Surveys of these costs may be found in Erin M. Tegtmeier and Michael D. Duffy, External Costs of Agricultural Production in the United States, 2(1) International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 1 (2004); Jules Pretty et al., Policy Challenges and Priorities for Internalizing the Externalities of Modern Agriculture, 44 Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 263 (2001); European Environmental Agency, The Externalities of Agriculture: What Do We Know (May 1998); David Pearce et al., The True Price of Pesticide, in William Vorley and Dennis Keeney (eds.), Bugs in the System: Redesigning the Pesticide Industry for Sustainable Agriculture (1998); Pierre Crosson, Soil Erosion Estimates and Costs, 269 Science 461 (1995); David Pimentel et al., Environmental and Economic Costs of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits, 267 Science 1117 (1995); David Pimentel et al., Environmental and Economic Costs of Pesticide Use, 42 BioScience 750 (1992); R.A. Steiner et al., Incorporating Externality Costs in Productivity Measures: A Case Study Using U.S. Agriculture, in Vick Barnett et al. (eds.), Agricultural Sustainability: Environmental and Statistical Considerations 209 (1995). Older sources are summarized in James Stephen Carpenter, Farm Chemicals, Soil Erosion, and Sustainable Agriculture, 13 Stanford Environmental Law Journal (1993).

  2. 2.

    Suzie Greenhalgh and Amanda Sauer, Awakening the Dead Zone: An Investment of Agriculture, Water Quality, and Climate Change (2003); National Research Council, The Use of Drugs in Food Animals: Benefits and Risks (1999).

  3. 3.

    National Research Council, Air Emissions: From Animal Feeding Operations: Current Knowledge, Future Needs (2001).

  4. 4.

    The approach is discussed in Judith D. Soul and Jon K. Piper, Farming in Nature’s Image: An Ecological Approach to Agriculture (1991) and Wes Jackson, New Roots for Agriculture (1985).

  5. 5.

    A good starting point is National Research Council, Alternative Agriculture (1993). A series of publications summarize well the conventional and more sustainable methods for raising livestock. See Beth Nelson (ed.), Poultry Your Way: A Guide to Alternatives for the Upper Midwest (2005); Debra Elias Morse and Beth Nelson (eds.), Hogs Your Way: Choosing a Hog Production System in the Upper Midwest (2005). A more economic view is presented by John E. Ikerd, Sustainable Agriculture: An Alternative Model for Future Pork Producers, in Jeffrey S. Royer and Richard T. Rogers (eds.), The Industrialization of Agriculture: Vertical Coordination in the U.S. Food System (1998).

  6. 6.

    A summary of the research on rotational grazing can be found at Mathew J. Mariola et al., The Societal Implications of Management Intensive Grazing: An Annotated Bibliography (January 2005).

  7. 7.

    Dayton Lambert et al., Conservation-Compatible Practices and Programs: Who Participates, USDA, ERS Economic Research Report No. 14 (February 2006).

  8. 8.

    A sense of the imposing nature of making such a determination can be gained by browsing the seemingly endless inventory of practices in use in American agriculture in Merritt Padgitt et al., Production Practices for Major Crops in U.S Agriculture, 1990–97, USDA ERS Statistical Bulletin No. 969 (August 2000); Margriet Caswell et al., Adoption of Agricultural Production Practices: Lessons Learned from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Area Studies Project, USDA ERS Agricultural Economic Report No. 792 (January 2001); and in the Ralph Heimlich’s printer-defeating, Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2003, USDA ERS Agricultural Handbook No. 722 (February 2003).

  9. 9.

    This general problem is described in Marc Ribaudo, Managing Manure: New Clean Water Act Regulations Create Imperative for Livestock Producers, Amber Waves (February 2003). Manure application to land is discussed in detail in Marc Ribaudo et al., Manure Management for Water Quality: Costs to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Land, USDA ERS Agricultural Economic Report No. 824 (June 2003).

  10. 10.

    Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST), Integrated Animal Waste Management, Task Force Report No. 128 (November 1996).

  11. 11.

    Critics of such an approach often suggest that large operations will be better able to raise the capital to meet stricter environmental rules, and that smaller operations could have a difficult time adjusting. This seems especially likely for smaller operations that have sought to adopt a form of industrialized livestock production. For hog operations see William D. McBride and Nigel Key, Economic and Structural Relationships in U.S. Hog Production, USDA ERS Agricultural Economic Report No. 818 (February 2003).

References

  • Attfield, R. (2001). Christianity. In D. Jamieson (Ed.), A companion to environmental philsophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auxter, T. (1985). Poetry and self-knowledge in rural life. Agriculture and human values, II, 2, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1993). Communitarianism and its critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. (1969). The long-legged house. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. (1977). The unsettling of America: Culture and agriculture. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. (1987). Home economics. San Francisco, CA: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. (1991). Standing on earth. Ipswich, MA: Golgonooza Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, L. (1994). Moral perception and particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. (1979). Food for the future. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. (1993). Farm chemicals, soil erosion, and sustainable agriculture. Stanford Envi-ronmental Law Journal, 13, 190–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (2002). Must we mean what we say?: A book of essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, G. (Ed.). (1987). Is there a moral obligation to save the family farm? Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, G. (1996). Toward an evangelical environmental ethic. In S. M. Postiglione, & R. Brungs (Eds.), Christianity and the environmental ethos. St. Louis, MO: ITEST Faith/Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, G. (1997). Theism and environmental ethics. In P. Quinn, & C. Taliaferro (Eds.), A companion to philosophy of religion. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). (1996). Integrated animal waste management. Task Force Report No. 128. Ames, IA: CAST

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosson, P. (1995). Soil erosion estimates and costs. Science, 269, 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gery, M. (1993). Founding farms; portraits of five Massachusetts family farms. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S., & Sauer, A. (2003). Awakening the dead zone: An investment for agriculture, water quality, and climate change. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (1848). The west: Its commerce and navigation. Rochester, MN: H.W. Derby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. (1991). Farming on the edge; saving family farms in Marin County. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headler, S. (1991). The political economy of American capitalism. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hightower, J. (1973). Hard tomatoes, hard times. Cambridge: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hightower, J. (1975). The case for the family farmer. In C. Lerza, & M. Jacobson (Eds.), Food for people, not for profit. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodne, C. (1987). We whose future has been stolen. In G. Comstock (Ed.), Is there a moral obligation to save the family farm? Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, W. (1985). New roots for agriculture. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, W. (1988). Ecosystem Agriculture. In P. Allen, & P. van Dusen (Eds.), Global perspec-tives on agroecology and sustainable agricultural systems: Proceedings of the Sixth Inter­na-tional Conference of the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements: Vol. 1. Santa Cruz: Agroecology Program, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, T. (1984). Writings. New York: Literary Classics of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, A. V. (1992). The corporate reapers: The book of agriculture. Washington, DC: Essential Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D., et al. (2006). Conservation-compatible practices and programs: Who participate. Economic Research Report No. 14. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langerak, E., et al. (1989). Christian faith, health, and medical practice. Grand Rapids, MI: William Eerdmans Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac, and other sketches here and there. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariola, M., et al. (2005). The societal implications of management intensive grazing: an annotated bibliography. Madison, WI: Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1993). Alternative agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1999). The use of drugs in food animals: Benefits and risks. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2001). Air emissions: From animal feeding operations: Current knowledge, future needs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paddock, J., Paddock, P., & Bly, C. (1988). Soil and survival; land stewardship and the future of American agriculture. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D., et al. (1988). The true price of pesticide. In W. Vorley, & D. Keeney (Eds.), Bugs in the system: Redesigning the pesticide industry for sustainable agriculture. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., et al. (1992). Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use, Bioscience, 42, 740–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., et al. (1995). Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science, 267, 1117–1123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J., et al. (2001). Policy challenges and priorities for internalizing the externalities of modern agriculture, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44, 263–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo, M., et al. (2003). Manure management for water quality: Costs to animal feeding operations of applying manure nutrients to land, Agricultural Economic Report No. 824. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H. (1986). Philosophy gone wild. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, P. (1990). Farming is in our blood; farm families in economic crisis. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, S. (1982). The rejection of consequentialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K. (1991). Property and procedural justice: The plight of the small farmer. In C. V. Moscow (Ed.), Ethics and agriculture. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1933). The wealth of nations. New York: E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, M. S., & Bubolz, M. (1996). Families on small farms; case studies in human ecology. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soul, J., & Piper, J. (1991). Farming in nature’s image: An ecological approach to agriculture.Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R., et al. (1995). Incorporating externality costs in productivity measures: A case study using U.S. agriculture. In V. Barnett, et al. (Eds.), Agricultural sustainability: Environmental and statistical considerations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, M. (1988). Family farming: A new economic vision. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Food and Development Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taliaferro, C. (1992a). Divine agriculture. Agriculture and human values, pp. 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taliaferro, C. (1992b). The intensity of theism. Sophia, 31(3), 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegtmeier, E., & Duffy, M. (2004). External costs of agricultural production in the United States, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2(1), 155–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (1998). Agricultural ethics. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., & Stout, B. (Eds.). (1991). Beyond the large farm. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweeten, L. (1989). Farm policy analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Taliaferro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taliaferro, C., Carpenter, S. (2010). Farms. In: Comstock, G.L. (eds) Life Science Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8792-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics