Advertisement

Nanocomposites for Regenerative Medicine

  • Ryan Hoshi
  • Antonio R. Webb
  • Hongjin Qiu
  • Guillermo A. AmeerEmail author
Conference paper
  • 992 Downloads
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology book series (NAPSA)

Abstract

This chapter describes properties and applications of nanocomposites in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine with an emphasis on the impact of the nanophase on nanocomposite function. The nanophase can be used as a means to engineer new physical properties that improve the utility of tissue engineering scaffolds. Several examples of the use of the nanophase for mechanical reinforcement or drug delivery are discussed with an emphasis on understanding how nanoparticles are used to achieve the controlled release of macromolecules. Advances in nanotechnology, knowledge of mechanical reinforcement at the nanoscale level, and new strategies for controlled drug release will contribute to the next generation of nanocomposite-based scaffolds designed for regenerative medicine.

Keywords

Nanocomposites Tissue engineering Nanotechnology Drug delivery Nanofibers Electrospinning Nanopores 

References

  1. Ahmed F et al (2006) Biodegradable polymersomes loaded with both paclitaxel and doxorubicin permeate and shrink tumors, inducing apoptosis in proportion to accumulated drug. J Control Release 116(2):150–158Google Scholar
  2. Asuri P et al (2006) Increasing protein stability through control of the nanoscale environment. Langmuir 22(13):5833–5836Google Scholar
  3. Atala A, Lanza RP (2001) Methods of tissue engineering. Academic, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleach NC et al (2002) Effect of filler content on mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of particulate biphasic calcium phosphate-polylactide composties. Biomaterials 23:1579–1585Google Scholar
  5. Bull SR et al (2005) Self-assembled peptide amphiphile nanofibers conjugated to MRI contrast agents. Nano Lett 5(1):1–4Google Scholar
  6. Bulter DL, Goldstein SA, Guilak F (2000) Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics. J Biomech Eng 122:570–575Google Scholar
  7. Casey A et al (2007) Spectroscopic analysis confirms the interactions between single walled carbon nanotubes and various dyes commonly used to assess cytotoxicity. Carbon 45(7):1432Google Scholar
  8. Catledge SA et al (2007) An electrospun triphasic nanofibrous scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 2:142–150Google Scholar
  9. Chew S et al (2006) Mechanical properties of single electrospun drug-encapsulated nanofibres. Nanotechnology 17:3880–3891Google Scholar
  10. Chorny M et al (2007) Magnetically driven plasmid DNA delivery with biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles. FASEB J 21(10):2510–2519Google Scholar
  11. Cooke FW (1992) Ceramics in orthopedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 6:135–146Google Scholar
  12. Cool SM et al (2007) Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) composite materials for bone tissue regeneration: in vitro performance assessed by osteoblast proliferation, osteoclast adhesion and resorption, and macrophage proinflammatory response. J Biomed Mater Res 82:599–610Google Scholar
  13. Crosby AJ, Lee JY (2007a) Polymer nanocomposites: the “nano” effect on mechanical properties. Polym Rev 47(2):217–229Google Scholar
  14. Crosby AJ, Lee J-Y (2007b) Polymer nanocomposites: the “nano” effect on mechanical properties. Polym Rev 47:217–229Google Scholar
  15. Daniels AU, Chang MK, Andriano KP (1990) Mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers and composites proposed for internal fixation of bone. J Appl Biomater 1(1):57–78Google Scholar
  16. Das M et al (2007) Auto-catalytic ceria nanoparticles offer neuroprotection to adult rat spinal cord neurons. Biomaterials 28(10):1918–1925Google Scholar
  17. Deng X, Hao J, Wang C (2001) Preparation and mechanical properties of nanocomposites of poly(D, L-lactide) with Ca-deficient hydroxyapatite nanocrystals. Biomaterials 22(21):2867–2873Google Scholar
  18. Devalapally H et al (2007) Poly(ethylene oxide)-modified poly(beta-amino ester) nanoparticles as a pH-sensitive system for tumor-targeted delivery of hydrophobic drugs: part 3. Therapeutic efficacy and safety studies in ovarian cancer xenograft model. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 59(4):477–484Google Scholar
  19. Du C et al (1998) Tissue response to nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen composite implants in marrow cavity. J Biomed Mater Res 42:540–548Google Scholar
  20. Du C et al (1999) Three-dimensional nano-HAp/collagen matrix loading with osteogenic cells in organ culture. J Biomed Mater Res 44:407–415Google Scholar
  21. Du C et al (2000) Formation of calcium phosphate/collagen composites through mineralization of collagen matrix. J Biomed Mater Res 50:518–527Google Scholar
  22. Eaton M (2007) Nanomedicine: industry-wise research. Nat Mater 6(4):251–253Google Scholar
  23. Elcin AE, Elcin YM (2006) Localized angiogenesis induced by human vascular endothelial growth factor-activated PLGA sponge. Tissue Eng 12(4):959–968Google Scholar
  24. Feazell RP et al (2007) Soluble single-walled carbon nanotubes as longboat delivery systems for platinum(IV) anticancer drug design. J Am Chem Soc 129(27):8438–8439Google Scholar
  25. Gao H et al (2007) Conjugates of poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) on amino cyclodextrins and their nanoparticles as protein delivery system. J Biomed Mater Res A 80(1):111–122Google Scholar
  26. Gaucher G et al (2005) Block copolymer micelles: preparation, characterization and application in drug delivery. J Control Release 109(1–3):169–188Google Scholar
  27. Gibson LJ (1985) The mechanical behavior of cancellous bone. Biomechanics 18:317–328Google Scholar
  28. Gu F, Neufeld R, Amsden B (2007) Sustained release of bioactive therapeutic proteins from a biodegradable elastomeric device. J Control Release 117(1):80–89Google Scholar
  29. Guler M, Claussena R, Stupp SI (2005) Encapsulation of pyrene within self-assembled peptide amphiphile nanofibers. J Mater Chem 15:4507–4512Google Scholar
  30. Hartgerink JD, Beniash E, Stupp SI (2001) Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science 294(5547):1684–1688Google Scholar
  31. Hench LL, Polak JM (2002) Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 295:1014–1017Google Scholar
  32. Hosseinkhani H et al (2007) Bone regeneration through controlled release of bone morphogenetic protein-2 from 3-D tissue engineered nano-scaffold. J Control Release 117(3):380–386Google Scholar
  33. Hu SH et al (2007) Nano-ferrosponges for controlled drug release. J Control Release 121(3):181–189Google Scholar
  34. Huang H et al (2007) Active nanodiamond hydrogels for chemotherapeutic delivery. Nano Lett 7(11):3305–3314Google Scholar
  35. Jiang H et al (2006) Modulation of protein release from biodegradable core-shell structured fibers prepared by coaxial electrospinning. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 79(1):50–57Google Scholar
  36. Jie W, Yubao L (2004) Tissue engineering scaffold material of nano-apatite crystals and polyamide composite. Eur Polym J 40:509–515Google Scholar
  37. Jordan J et al (2005) Experimental trends in polymer nanocomposites – a review. Mater Sci Eng A 393:1–11Google Scholar
  38. Jurvelin JS, Buschmann MD, Hunziker EB (2003) Mechanical anisotropy of the human knee articular cartilage in compression. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 217(3):215–219Google Scholar
  39. Kabanov AV, Gendelman HE (2007) Nanomedicine in the diagnosis and therapy of neurodegenerative disorders. Progress Polym Sci 32(8–9):1054–1082Google Scholar
  40. Kim BS, Mooney DJ (2000) Scaffolds for engineering smooth muscle under cyclic mechanical strain conditions. J Biomech Eng 122(3):210–215Google Scholar
  41. Kim BS et al (1999) Cyclic mechanical strain regulates the development of engineered smooth muscle tissue. Nat Biotechnol 17(10):979–983Google Scholar
  42. Kim Y et al (2005) Polymeric worm micelles as nano-carriers for drug delivery. Nanotechnology 16:S484–S491Google Scholar
  43. Kim S et al (2006) Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:1399–1409Google Scholar
  44. Kohri M et al (1993) In vivo stability of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics. Biomaterials 14:299–304Google Scholar
  45. Koji H et al (2001) Prospects for bone fixation development of new cerclage fixation techniques. Mater Sci Eng C 17(1–2):19–26Google Scholar
  46. Kong L et al (2005) Preparation and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan composite. J Biomed Mater Res 75:275–282Google Scholar
  47. Kong L et al (2006) A study on the bioactivity of chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Eur Polym J 42:3171–3179Google Scholar
  48. Korhonen RK et al (2002) Comparison of the equilibrium response of articular cartilage in unconfined compression, confined compression and indentation. J Biomech 35(7):903–909Google Scholar
  49. Kreuter J (2001) Nanoparticulate systems for brain delivery of drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 47(1):65–81Google Scholar
  50. Kweon H et al (2003) A novel degradable polycaprolactone networks for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 24(5):801–808Google Scholar
  51. Kwon SH et al (2003) Synthesis and dissolution behavior of B-TCP and HA/B-TCP composite powders. J Eur Ceramic Soc 23:1039–1045Google Scholar
  52. Langer R, Vacanti JP (1993) Tissue engineering. Science 260(5110):920–926Google Scholar
  53. Lee SH et al (2003) Elastic biodegradable poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone) scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 66A(1):29–37Google Scholar
  54. Lee SH, Zhang Z, Feng SS (2007) Nanoparticles of poly(lactide)-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate (PLA-TPGS) copolymers for protein drug delivery. Biomaterials 28(11):2041–2050Google Scholar
  55. LeGeros RZ (2002) Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 395:81–98Google Scholar
  56. Li Z et al (2005a) Studies on the porous scaffold made of the nano-HA/PA66 composite. J Mater Sci 40:107–110Google Scholar
  57. Li Z et al (2005b) Preparation and in vitro investigation of chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite composite as bone substitute materials. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 16:213–219Google Scholar
  58. Li X et al (2006) Chemical characteristics and cytocompatibility of collagen-based scaffold reinforced by chitin fibers for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 77:219–226Google Scholar
  59. Liao SS et al (2004) Hierarchically biomimetic bone scaffold material: nano-HA/collagen/PLA composite. J Biomed Mater Res 69(2):158–165Google Scholar
  60. Liu Z et al (2007) Supramolecular chemistry on water soluble carbon nanotbues for drug loading and delivery. ACS NANO 1(1):50–56Google Scholar
  61. Luong-Van E et al (2006) Controlled release of heparin from poly(epsilon-caprolactone) electrospun fibers. Biomaterials 27(9):2042–2050Google Scholar
  62. Ma P, Zhang R (1999) Synthetic nano-scale fibrous extracellular matrix. J Biomed Mater Res 46:60–72Google Scholar
  63. Ma Z et al (2005) Potential of nanofiber matrix as tissue-engineering scaffolds. Tissue Eng 11(1–2):101–109Google Scholar
  64. Madihally SV, Matthew HW (1999) Porous chitosan scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 20(12):1133–1142Google Scholar
  65. Megeed Z, Winters RM, Yarmush ML (2006) Modulation of single-chain antibody affinity with temperature-responsive elastin-like polypeptide linkers. Biomacromolecules 7(4):999–1004Google Scholar
  66. Mi F-L et al (2002) In vivo biocompatibility and degradability of a novel injectable chitosan based implant. Biomaterials 23(1):181–191Google Scholar
  67. Motlagh D et al (2007) Hemocompatibility evaluation of poly(diol citrate) in vitro for vascular tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A80(3):661–668Google Scholar
  68. Murakami H et al (1999) Preparation of poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles by modified spontaneous emulsifcation solvent diffusion method. Int J Pharm 187:143–152Google Scholar
  69. Murakami H et al (2000) Further application of a modified spontaneous emulsification solvent diffusion method to various types of PLGA and PLA polymers for preparation of nanoparticles. Powder Technol 107:137–143Google Scholar
  70. Nerem RM (2003) Role of mechanics in vascular tissue engineering. Biorheology 40:281–287Google Scholar
  71. Nie H, Wang C-H (2007) Fabrication and characterization of PLGA/HAp composite scaffolds for delivery of BMP-2 plasmid DNA. J Control Release 120:111–121Google Scholar
  72. Niklason LE et al (1999) Functional arteries grown in vitro. Science 284(5413):489–493Google Scholar
  73. Nishiyama N, Kataoka K (2006) Current state, achievements, and future prospects of polymeric micelles as nanocarriers for drug and gene delivery. Pharmacol Ther 112(3):630–648Google Scholar
  74. Oh JK et al (2007) Biodegradable nanogels prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization as potential drug delivery carriers: synthesis, biodegradation, in vitro release, and bioconjugation. J Am Chem Soc 129(18):5939–5945Google Scholar
  75. Pachence JM, Kohn J (2000) Biodegradable polymers. In: Lanza RP, Langer R, Vacanti J (eds) Principles of tissue engineering. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 263–277Google Scholar
  76. Pego AP et al (2003) Biodegradable elastomeric scaffolds for soft tissue engineering. J Control Release 87:69–79Google Scholar
  77. Perkin KK et al (2005) Fabrication of hybrid nanocapsules by calcium phosphate mineralization of shell cross-linked polymer micelles and nanocages. Nano Lett 5(7):1457–1461Google Scholar
  78. Petri B et al (2007) Chemotherapy of brain tumour using doxorubicin bound to surfactant-coated poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles: revisiting the role of surfactants. J Control Release 117(1):51–58Google Scholar
  79. Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG (2006) Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: a review. Tissue Eng 12(5):1197–1211Google Scholar
  80. Qiu H et al (2006) A citric acid-based hydroxyapatite composite for orthopedic implants. Biomaterials 27(34):5845–5854Google Scholar
  81. Raman VI, Palmese GR (2005) Nanoporous thermosetting polymers. Langmuir 21(4):1539–1546Google Scholar
  82. Ramay HR, Zhang M (2003) Preparation of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds by combination of the gel-casting and polymer sponge methods. Biomaterials 24:3293–3302Google Scholar
  83. Ramay HR, Zhang M (2004) Biphasic calcium phosphate nanocomposite porous scaffolds for load-bearing bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 25:5171–5180Google Scholar
  84. Ratner BD, Bryant SJ (2004) Biomaterials: where we have been and where we are going. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 6:41–75Google Scholar
  85. Reguera J et al (2004) Nanopore formation by self-assembly of the model genetically engineered elastin-like polymer [(VPGVG)2(VPGEG)(VPGVG)2]15. J Am Chem Soc 126(41):13212–13213Google Scholar
  86. Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P (1998) Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys 20:92–102Google Scholar
  87. Ryu HS et al (2002) An improvement in sintering property of B-tricalcium phosphate by addition of calcium pyrophosphate. Biomaterials 23:909–914Google Scholar
  88. Sachols E, Gotora D, Czernuszka J (2006) Collagen scaffolds reinforced with biomimetic composite nano-sized carbonate-substituted hydroxyapatite crystals and shaped by rapid prototyping to contain internal microchannels. Tissue Eng 12(9):2479–2487Google Scholar
  89. Shea LD et al (2000) Engineering bone development from a pre-osteoblast cell line on three-dimensional scaffolds. Tissue Eng 6:605–617Google Scholar
  90. Sheridan MH et al (2000) Bioabsorbable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering capable of sustained growth factor delivery. J Control Release 64(1–3):91–102Google Scholar
  91. Simnick A, Lim DW, Chilkoti A (2007) Biomedical and biotechnological applications of elastin-like polypeptides. J Macromol Sci 47:121–154Google Scholar
  92. Singh S, Sinha Ray S (2007) Polylactide based nanostructured biomaterials and their applications. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 7:2596–2615Google Scholar
  93. Singh R et al (2005) Binding and condensation of plasmid DNA onto functionalized carbon nanotubes: toward the construction of nanotube-based gene delivery vectors. J Am Chem Soc 127(12):4388–4396Google Scholar
  94. Springer I et al (2001) Culture of cells gained from temporomandibular joint cartilage on non-absorbable scaffolds. Biomaterials 22:2569–2577Google Scholar
  95. Taepaiboon P, Rungsardthong U, Supaphol P (2006) Drug-loaded electrospun mats of poly(vinyl alcohol) fibres and their release characteristics of four model drugs. Nanotechnology 17:2317–2329Google Scholar
  96. Upadhyay DJ et al (2004) A comparative study of the surface activation of polyamides using an air dielectric barrier discharge. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 248(1–3):47–56Google Scholar
  97. Urry DW, Pattanaik A (1997) Elastic protein-based materials in tissue reconstruction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 831:32–46Google Scholar
  98. Vacanti JP, Langer R (1999) Tissue engineering: the design and fabrication of living replacement devices for surgical reconstruction and transplantation. Lancet 354:SI32–SI34Google Scholar
  99. VandeVord PJ et al (2002) Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice. J Biomed Mater Res 59:585–590Google Scholar
  100. Vinogradov SV, Batrakova EV, Kabanov AV (2004) Nanogels for oligonucleotide delivery to the brain. Bioconjug Chem 15(1):50–60Google Scholar
  101. Waldman SD et al (2003) Effect of biomechanical conditioning on cartilaginous tissue formation in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A(Suppl 2):101–105Google Scholar
  102. Wang RZ et al (1995) Synthesis of nanophase hydroxyapatite collagen composite. J Mater Sci Lett 14:490–492Google Scholar
  103. Wang Y et al (2002) A tough biodegradable elastomer. Nat Biotechnol 20(6):587–591Google Scholar
  104. Wang Y, Kim YM, Langer R (2003) In vivo degradation characteristics of poly(glycerol sebacate). J Biomed Mater Res 66A:192–197Google Scholar
  105. Wang H et al (2007) Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28:3338–3348Google Scholar
  106. Webb A, Yang J, Ameer GA (2004) Biodegradable polyester elastomers in tissue engineering. Expert Opin Biol Ther 4(6):801–812Google Scholar
  107. Webb AR, Kumar V, Ameer GA (2007) Biodegradable poly(diol citrate) nanocomposite elastomers for soft tissue engineering. J Mater Chem 17:900–906Google Scholar
  108. Wei G, Ma PX (2004) Structure and properties of nano-hydroxyapatite/polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 25:4749–4757Google Scholar
  109. Wei G, Ma PX (2006) Macroporous and nanofibrous polymer scaffolds and polymer/bone-like apatite composite scaffolds generated by sugar spheres. J Biomed Mater Res 78:306–315Google Scholar
  110. Wei H et al (2007) Self-assembled, thermosensitive micelles of a star block copolymer based on PMMA and PNIPAAm for controlled drug delivery. Biomaterials 28(1):99–107Google Scholar
  111. Witzmann FA, Monteiro-Riviere NA (2006) Multi-walled carbon nanotube exposure alters protein expression in human keratinocytes. Nanomedicine 2(3):158–168Google Scholar
  112. Woo KM, Chen VJ, Ma PX (2003) Nano-fibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment. J Biomed Mater Res 67:531–537Google Scholar
  113. Worle-Knirsch JM, Pulskamp K, Krug HF (2006) Oops they did it again! Carbon nanotubes hoax scientists in viability assays. Nano Lett 6(6):1261–1268Google Scholar
  114. Yang S et al (2001) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng 7(6):679–689Google Scholar
  115. Yang J, Webb AR, Ameer GA (2004a) Novel citric acid-based biodegradable elastomers for tissue engineering. Adv Mater 16(6):511–516Google Scholar
  116. Yang J, Webb A, Ameer G (2004b) Novel citric acid-based biodegradable elastomers for tissue engineering. Adv Mater 16(6):511–516Google Scholar
  117. Yang J, Webb AR, Ameer GA (2005) Biodegradable elastomeric polymers for tissue engineering. In: Mallapragda S, Narasimhan B (eds) Handbook of biodegradable polymeric materials and their applications. American Scientific Publishers, ValenciaGoogle Scholar
  118. Yang J et al (2006a) Synthesis and evaluation of poly(diol citrate) biodegradable elastomers. Biomaterials 27(9):1889–1898Google Scholar
  119. Yang J et al (2006b) Synthesis and evaluation of novel biodegradable elastomeric polyesters. Biomaterials 27:1889–1898Google Scholar
  120. Yang J et al (2006c) Modulating expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular graft host response via citric acid-based biodegradable elastomers. Adv Mater 18(12):1493–1498Google Scholar
  121. Yang M, Yunhui Y, Yanli L, Guoli S, Ruqin Yu (2006d) Platinum nanoparticles-doped sol-gel/carbon nanotubes composite electrochemical sensors and biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 21(7):1125–1131Google Scholar
  122. Zhang R, Ma PX (2000) Synthetic nano-fibrillar extracellular matrices with predesigned macroporous architecture. J Biomed Mater Res 52(2):430–438Google Scholar
  123. Zhang SM et al (2003a) Syntheis and biocompatibility of porous nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen/alginate composite. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 14(7):641–645Google Scholar
  124. Zhang SM et al (2003b) Synthesis and biocompatibility of porous nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen/alginate composite. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 14:641–645Google Scholar
  125. Zhang Y et al (2005) Recent development of polymer nanofibers for biomedical and biotechnological applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16(10):933–946Google Scholar
  126. Zhang YZ et al (2006) Coaxial electrospinning of (fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated bovine serum albumin)-encapsulated poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanofibers for sustained release. Biomacromolecules 7(4):1049–1057Google Scholar
  127. Zhou N, Bates FS, Lodge TP (2006) Mesoporous membrane templated by a polymeric bicontinuous microemulsion. Nano Lett 6(10):2354–2357Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan Hoshi
    • 1
  • Antonio R. Webb
    • 1
  • Hongjin Qiu
    • 1
  • Guillermo A. Ameer
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering DepartmentNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Institute for BioNanotechnology in Medicine (IBNAM)Northwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations