Abstract
Unreinforced masonry infill walls are prone to early brittle failure and they do not structurally exist after failure. Therefore, they are suitable to be considered in progressive collapse analysis. In this paper, a previously developed infill wall analytical model which considers the interaction between in-plane and out-of-plane responses is implemented into a progressive collapse algorithm. The infill wall model is utilized for investigating the efficacy of a retrofit method which comprises of strengthening the infill walls with mesh reinforcement and a concrete layer taking advantage of the strengthened infill walls as rocking spines.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Society of Civil Engineers (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA-356, ASCE, Reston, VA
American Society of Civil Engineers (2008) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI Standard 41-06, ASCE, Reston, VA
Erbay ÖO (2004) A methodology to assess seismic risk for populations of unreinforced masonry buildings. Mid-America Earthquake Center, MAE, Report 07-10
Günay S, Korolyk M, Mar D, Mosalam KM, Rodgers J (2009) Infill walls as a spine to enhance the seismic performance of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames. ATC&SEI conference on improving the seismic performance of existing buildings and other structures, 9–11 December, San Francisco, CA, USA
Hashemi SA, Mosalam KM (2007) Seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings including effects of infill masonry walls. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Technical Report 2007/100
Kadysiewski S, Mosalam KM (2009) Modelling of unreinforced masonry walls considering in-plane and out-of-plane interaction. 11th Canadian masonry symposium, 31 May–3 June, Toronto, Canada
Lee T-H, Mosalam KM (2003) Sensitivity of seismic demand of a reinforced concrete shear-wall building. 9th international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering, ICASP9, San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–9 July, pp 1511–1518
Lee T-H, Mosalam KM (2006) Probabilistic seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete structural components and systems. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Technical Report 2006/04
Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves G (2004) Opensees User’s Manual. http://www.opensees.berkeley.edu 10 Sept 2009
Talaat M, Mosalam KM (2008) Computational modeling of progressive collapse in reinforced concrete frame structures. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER 2007/10
Talaat M, Mosalam KM (2009) Modeling progressive collapse in reinforced concrete buildings using direct element removal. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38(5):609–634
Acknowledgements
TUBITAK (Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey) is acknowledged for the funding provided to the second author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mosalam, K.M., Günay, M.S. (2010). Seismic Retrofit of Non-ductile Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Infill Walls as a Rocking Spine. In: Fardis, M. (eds) Advances in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8746-1_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8746-1_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8745-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8746-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)