Skip to main content

A Practice-Oriented Approach for Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of Building Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 13))

Abstract

A relatively simple probabilistic approach for the seismic performance assessment of building structures combines the SAC-FEMA method, which is a part of the broader PEER probabilistic framework and permits probability assessment in closed form, with the N2 method, which is based on the pushover analysis of a multi-degree-of-freedom model and the response spectrum analysis of an equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) model. In the probabilistic approach the most demanding part of the PEER probabilistic framework, i.e. the Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA), is replaced by the much simpler Incremental N2 (IN2) analysis which requires less input data and less effort but, nevertheless, generally provides an acceptable accuracy. The incremental N2 (IN2) curve is intended to approximate a summarized IDA curve. Predetermined default values for dispersion measures are needed for the practical implementation of the simplified approach. In the paper, the simplified approach is summarized and applied to the seismic performance assessment of two variants of an asymmetric three-storey reinforced concrete frame building. The first variant represents a building designed for vertical loads only, without consideration of seismic codes (the “SPEAR building”, tested and analyzed within the European project SPEAR), whereas the second variant represents a building with the same geometry but designed according to Eurocode 8 (EC8) considering design ground acceleration on rock of 0.25g and soil type C. The probabilities of exceedance of the near collapse (NC) limit state are estimated and discussed. The results of the analyses indicate that the building designed according to the EC8 is able to survive a ground motion which is about 3.1 times stronger than in the case of the SPEAR building, while the probability of the exceedance of the NC limit state is about 25 times smaller.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. CEN (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic action and rules for buildings, European standard EN 1998-1. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  2. CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings, European standard EN 1998-3. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cornell CA, Jalayar F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA (2002) Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng ASCE 128(4):526–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deierlein G (2004) Overview of a comprehensive framework for earthquake performance assessment. In: Fajfar P, Krawinkler H (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on performance-based seismic design – concepts and implementation, Bled, Slovenia, PEER Report 2004/05:15–26, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2004) IN2 – a simple alternative for IDA. Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, paper 3353

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2007) Simplified probabilistic seismic performance assessment of plan-asymmetric buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36:2021–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2008a) Effects of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four storey reinforced concrete frame – a deterministic assessment. Eng Struct 30:1991–2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2008b) Effects of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four storey reinforced concrete frame – a probabilistic assessment. Eng Struct 30:3186–3192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16(3):573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fajfar P, Marušić D, Peruš I (2005) Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings. J Earth Eng 9(6):831–854

    Google Scholar 

  11. FEMA 350 (2000) Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment frame buildings, SAC Joint Venture, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington (DC)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rozman M, Fajfar P (2009) Seismic response of a RC frame building designed according to old and modern practices. Bull Earthq Eng 7:779–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C A (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Fajfar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fajfar, P., Dolšek, M. (2010). A Practice-Oriented Approach for Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of Building Structures. In: Fardis, M. (eds) Advances in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8746-1_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics