Skip to main content

Societal Framework of Psychiatry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Ethics in Psychiatry

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 45))

  • 1210 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will examine the ethical issues relevant to the relationship between society and its individual members, in health and illness. Particular attention will be given to the discussion of unmet needs of the mentally ill resulting from society’s negative attitudes towards them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to this model ‘acceptable public health goals include: (1) reducing the risks of ill health that people are exposed to as a result of other people’s actions or behaviours, for example reducing drunk-driving and passive smoking; (2) reducing causes of ill health relating to environmental conditions, such as drinking water safety and housing standards; (3) protecting and promoting of the health of children and other vulnerable people; (4) helping people to overcome addictions and other unhealthy behaviours; (5) ensuring that it is easy for people to lead a healthy life, for example by providing convenient and safe opportunities for exercise; (6) ensuring that people have appropriate access to medical services; (7) reducing unfair health inequalities. At the same time, public health programmes should: (1) not attempt to coerce adults to lead healthy lives; (2) minimise interventions that are introduced without individual consent of those affected, or without procedural justice arrangements (such as democratic decision-making procedures) which provide adequate mandate; (3) seek to minimise interventions that are perceived as unduly intrusive and in conflict with important personal values’ (Nuffield Council on Bioethics 2007).

  2. 2.

    Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2007).

  3. 3.

    Editorial (2007) The ethics of public health. Lancet 370:1801.

  4. 4.

    See footnote 3.

  5. 5.

    Which are met in international epidemiological studies of psychiatric services (type, structure, number, access to, use of, efficiency etc) such as a lack of adequate assessment instruments some of which have been developed only recently (EPSILON, ESEMeD, EDEN) and some others, insufficient approaches (e.g. indicated by low response rates) and insufficient mental health reporting systems (up-to-now only global and unspecific data are available gathered by WHO, OECD, EUROSTAT, IMS.

Abbreviations

EDEN:

European Day-Hospital EvaluatioN

EPSILON:

European Psychiatric Services: Inputs Linked to Outcome Domains and Needs

ESEMeD:

European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders

EUROSTAT:

European Statistics

IMS:

International Measuring System

OECD:

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

GP:

General Practitioner

WHO:

World Health Organisation

SES:

Socio-Economic Status

References

  • Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S, Bruffaerts R, Brugha TS, Bryson H, de Girolamo G, Graaf R, Demyttenaere K, Gasquet I, Haro JM, Katz SJ, Kessler RC, Kovess V, Lépine JP, Ormel J, Polidori G, Russo LJ, Vilagut G, Almansa J, Arbabzadeh-Bouchez S, Autonell J, Bernal M, Buist-Bouwman MA, Codony M, Domingo-Salvany A, Ferrer M, Joo SS, Martínez-Alonso M, Matschinger H, Mazzi F, Morgan Z, Morosini P, Palacín C, Romera B, Taub N, Vollebergh WA (2004) ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 Investigators, European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) Project use of mental health services in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand 109(420):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso J, Codony M, Kovess V, Angermeyer MC, Katz SJ, Haro JM, de Girolamo G, de Graaf R, Demyttenaere K, Vilagut G, Almansa J, Pierre Lépine J, Brugha TS (2007) Population level of unmet need for mental healthcare in Europe. Br J Psychiatry 190:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso J, Ferrer M, Romera B, Vilagut G, Angermeyer M, Bernert S, Brugha TS, Taub N, McColgen Z, de Girolamo G, Polidori G, Mazzi F, De Graaf R, Vollebergh WA, Buist-Bowman MA, Demyttenaere K, Gasquet I, Haro JM, Palacín C, Autonell J, Katz SJ, Kessler RC, Kovess V, Lépine JP, Arbabzadeh-Bouchez S, Ormel J, Bruffaerts R (2002) The European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000) project: rationale and methods. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 11(2):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaddeo F, Jones J (2007) What is the impact of socio-economic inequalities on the use of mental health services? Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 16(1):16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen RM (1995) Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 36:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews G, Issakidis C, Carter G (2001) Shortfall in mental health service utilisation. Br J Psychiatry 179:417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker T, Kilian R (2006) Psychiatric services for people with severe mental illness across western Europe: what can be generalized from current knowledge about differences in provision, costs and outcomes of mental health care? Acta Psychiatr Scand 113(429):9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijl RV, Ravelli A (2000) Psychiatric morbidity, service use, and need for care in the general population: results of The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study. Am J Public Health 90(4):602–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramesfeld A (2003) Service provision for elderly depressed persons and political and professional awareness for this subject: a comparison of six European countries. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 18(5):392–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carta MG, Kovess V, Hardoy MC, Brugha T, Fryers T, Lehtinen V, Xavier M (2004) Psychosocial wellbeing and psychiatric care in the European Communities: analysis of macro indicators. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39(11):883–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commander MJ, ODell SM, Surtees PG, Sashidaran SP (2003) Characteristics of patients and patterns of psychiatric service use in ethnic minorities. Int J Soc Psychiatry 49(3):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commander MJ, Odell SM, Surtees PG, Sashidharan SP (2004) Care pathways for south Asian and white people with depressive and anxiety disorders in the community. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39(4):259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Girolamo G, Alonso J, Vilagut G (2006) The ESEMeD-WMH project: strenghtening epidemiological research in Europe through the study of variation in prevalence estimates. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 15(3):167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Girolamo G, Bassi M, Neri G, Ruggeri M, Santone G, Picardi A (2007) The current state of mental health care in Italy: problems, perspectives, and lessons to learn. Eur Arch Psychiatr Clin Neurosci 257(2):83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst K, Ernst C (1992) Der Stand der italenischen Psychiatrie-Reform: das Beispiel der Lombardei im Vergleich zur Schweiz. Nervenarzt 63(11):668–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1991) Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main, p 229

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiejna A, Kallert TW, Rymaszewska J (2002) Treatment in psychiatric day hospital in comparison with inpatient wards in different European health care systems–objectives of EDEN project. Psychiatr Pol 36(6 Suppl):361–367 (Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilian R, Roick C, Bernert S, Matschinger H, Mory C, Becker T, Angermeyer MC (2001) Instruments for the economical evaluation of psychiatric service systems: methodological foundations of the European standardisation and the German adaptation. Psychiatr Prax 28(Suppl 2):S74–S78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovess-Masféty V, Saragoussi D, Sevilla-Dedieu C, Gilbert F, Suchocka A, Arveiller N, Gasquet I, Younes N, Hardy-Bayle MC (2007) What makes people decide who to turn to when faced with a mental health problem? Results from a French survey. BMC Public Health 7(147):188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linden M, Maier W, Achberger M, Herr R, Helmchen H, Benkert O (1996) Psychiatric diseases and their treatment in general practice in Germany. Results of a World Health Organization (WHO) study. Nervenarzt 67(3):205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell P, Bebbington P, McClelland R, Gillespie K, Houghton S (2002) Prevalence of psychiatric disorder and the need for psychiatric care in Northern Ireland: population study in the District of Derry. Br J Psychiatry 181:214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2007) http://www.nufieldbioethics.org. Accessed 27 May 2008.

  • Priebe S, Badesconyi A, Fioritti A, Hansson L, Kilian R, Torres-Gonzales F, Turner T, Wiersma D (2005) Reinstitutionalisation in mental health care: comparison of data on service provision from six European countries. Br Med J 330(7483):123–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartorius N (2006) Lessons from a 10-year global programme against stigma and discrimination because of an illness. Psychol Health Med 11(3):383–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schene AH, Koeter M, van Wijngaarden B, Knudsen HC, Leese M, Ruggeri M, White IR, Vázquez-Barquero JL (2000) Methodology of a multi-site reliability study. EPSILON Study 3. European Psychiatric Services: Inputs Linked to Outcome Domains and Needs (EPSILON). Br J Psychiatry 177(39):s15–s20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze B (2005) Stigmatisierungserfahrungen von Betroffenen und Angehörigen: Ergebnisse von Fokusgruppeninterviews. In: Gaebel W, Möller HJ, Rössler W (Hg) Stigma – Diskriminierung – Bewältigung. Der Umgang mit sozialer Ausgrenzung psychisch Kranker. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, pp 122–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansella M (1986) Community psychiatry without mental hospitals – the Italian experience: a review. J R Soc Med 79(11):664–669

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanfried Helmchen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helmchen, H., Sartorius, N. (2010). Societal Framework of Psychiatry. In: Helmchen, H., Sartorius, N. (eds) Ethics in Psychiatry. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8721-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8721-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8720-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8721-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics