Abstract
The disposal of industrial wastes in the subsurface has been ongoing for some time. Effective monitoring methods are necessary to verify both the safety of the disposed materials and the reliability of the methods used under present and future conditions. Utilizing reliable monitoring and verification methods is critical to understanding what is happening to both carbon dioxide and radioactive waste sequestered in the subsurface. Information gained while monitoring is useful to help determine what remedial action can be taken in the event of premature or unexpected escape of such geologically sequestered materials. This chapter looks at some of the general technologies used for monitoring the behaviour of these wastes in the subsurface and provides a general comparison of the methods used. An example is provided of how one method being used to monitor the behaviour of carbon dioxide in the subsurface could be adapted to monitor radioactive waste.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arts R, Eiken O, Chadwick A, Zweigel P, van der Meer L, Zinszner B (2004) Monitoring of CO2 injected at Sleipner using time-lapse seismic data. In: Freund P, Kaya Y, Lior N (eds) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Energy 29(9–10):1383–1392
Bachu S, Gunter WD, Perkins EH (1994) Aquifer disposal of CO2: hydrodynamic and mineral trapping. Energ Convers Manage 35(4):269–279
Becker DA, Buhmann D, Storck R, Alonso J, Cormenzana JL, Hugi M, van Gemert F, O’Sullivan P, Laciok A, Marivoet J, Sillen X, Nordman H, Vieno T, Niemeyer M (2002) Testing of safety and performance indicators (SPIN). Nuclear Science and Technology, Final Report EUR 19965 EN. European Commission, Luxembourg
Benson S, Cook P et al (2005) Underground geological storage. In: Metz B, Davidson O,de Coninck HC, Loos M, Meyer L (eds) IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp 196–276
Brunskill B (2006) Discussion of an option for geological storage of used nuclear fuel beneath the Williston basin of southern Saskatchewan. In: Summary of Investigations 2006, 1:1–8. Misc Rep 2006–4.1. Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Regina
Flett MA, Gurton RM, Taggart IJ (2005) Heterogeneous saline formations: long-term benefits for geo-sequestration of greenhouse gases. In: Rubin ES, Keith DW, Gilboy CF (eds) Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, vol 1. Elsevier, London, pp 501–509
Gunter WD, Bachu S, Benson S (2004) The role of hydrogeological and geochemical trapping in sedimentary basins for secure geological storage of carbon dioxide. In: Baines SJ, Worden RH (eds) Geological Storage of Carbon dioxide for Emissions Reduction, vol 233, Geological society special publication. Geological Society of London, London, pp 129–145
Holloway S, Chadwick A, Lindeberg E, Czernichowski-Lauriol I, Arts R (eds) (2003) Saline aquifer CO2 storage project (SACS) best practise manual. Report Number PH4/21. International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Trondheim
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2005) IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck HC, Loos M, Meyer LA (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York
Mazurek M (2004) Long-term used nuclear fuel waste management—Geoscientific review of the sedimentary sequence in southern Ontario. Technical Report TR 04–01. Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Bern
McCombie C (2003) Status of geological repositories for used nuclear fuel. Background Paper 6–3. Nuclear Waste Management Organization, Toronto
NEA (Nuclear Energy Agency) (2004) Post-closure safety case for geological repositories: nature and purpose. Report NEA No. 3679. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris
NEA (Nuclear Energy Agency) (2006) Advanced nuclear fuel cycles and radioactive waste management. Report NEA No. 5990. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris
OCRWM (Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management) (2001) Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report. DOE/RW-0539. US Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Washington, DC
Shaw J, Bachu S (2002) Screening, evaluation, and ranking of oil reservoirs suitable for CO2-flood EOR and carbon dioxide sequestration. J Can Petrol Technol 41(9):51–61
Simmons GR (2006) A framework for the long-term monitoring of a deep geologic repository for used nuclear fuel. Report 06819-REP-01300–10119-R00. Ontario Power Generation, Toronto
SKB (Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB—Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company) (2004) RD&D-Programme 2004. Programme for research, development and demonstration of methods for the management and disposal of nuclear waste, including social science research. SKB Technical Report TR-04–21. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm
Stenhouse MJ, Savage D (2004) Monitoring experience associated with nuclear waste disposal and its application to CO2 sequestration projects. In: Baines SJ, Worden RH (eds) Geological Storage of Carbon dioxide, vol 233, Geological Society Special Publication. Geological Society of London, London, pp 235–247
Sykes JF (2003) Characterizing the Geosphere in High-Level Radioactive Waste Management. Nuclear Waste Management Organization, Toronto, Background Paper 4–2
White D, Hirsche K, Davis T, Hutcheon I, Adair R, Burrows G, Graham S, Bencini R, Majer E, Maxwell S (2004) Theme 2: prediction, monitoring and verification of CO2 movements. In: Wilson M, Monea M (eds) IEA GHG Weyburn CO2 Monitoring & Storage Project Summary Report 2000–2004. Petroleum Technology Research Centre, Regina, pp 73–148
Whittaker S, Rostron B, Khan D, Hajnal Z, Qing H, Penner L, Maathuis H, Goussev S (2004) Theme 1: geological characterization. In: Wilson M, Monea M (eds) IEA GHG Weyburn CO2 Monitoring & Storage Project Summary Report 2000–2004. Petroleum Technology Research Centre, Regina, pp 15–69
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to the editor and reviewers for their supportive comments, which led to considerable improvements in the clarity of the text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brunskill, B., Wilson, M. (2011). Monitoring Methods Used to Identify the Migration of Carbon Dioxide and Radionuclides in the Geosphere. In: Toth, F. (eds) Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8712-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8712-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8711-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8712-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)