Skip to main content

Empirical Niche Modelling of the Spontaneous Diversity of Forage and Turf Species to Improve Collection and Ex Situ Conservation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable use of Genetic Diversity in Forage and Turf Breeding

Abstract

Rational sampling of the spontaneous diversity of forage and turf species requires an a priori knowledge of the range of environmental conditions suitable for these species. We introduce some concepts and methods for investigating the environmental range of species by empirical modelling of species ecological niche, and we suggest how such investigations could help to plan collection campaigns and to improve the choice of core-collections. The empirical modelling of the ecological niche of a species consists of building a function of environmental parameters predicting the presence of the species from a calibration dataset including observed presence-absence or abundance records of the species and environmental data at observation sites. We emphasize that data from collection campaigns of plant breeders are valuable information for niche modelling. We introduce two methods for investigating the environmental distribution of species and for niche modelling based on presence-absence data: the canonical correlation analysis and the logistic regression. We give examples combining niche model and GIS software that may contribute to organize collection campaigns. We suggest that models predicting probability of presence of species may be useful for the selection of core-collections. Such models may help to delineate geographically isolated areas of presence of species that should be sampled separately for selecting a core-collection. In each isolated area of presence, we propose to stratify the accessions in clusters according to the predicted probability of presence of the species in collection sites, and to select accessions in each cluster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Araujo, M., Guisan, A. 2006. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J. Biogeogr. 33:1677–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M. 2007. Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling 200:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balfourier, F., Charmet, G. 1991. Relationships between agronomic characters and ecogeographical factors in a collection of French perennial ryegrass populations. Agronomie 11:645–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balfourier, F., Charmet, G., Prosperi, J.M., Goulard, M., Monestiez, P. 1998. Comparison of different spatial strategies for sampling a core collection of natural populations of fodder crops. Genet. Sel. Evol. 30(Suppl. 1):S215–S235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bataillon, T.M., David, J.L., Schoen, D.J. 1996. Neutral genetic markers and conservation genetics: Simulated germplasm collections. Genetics 144:409–417.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.D.H. 1989a. Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31:818–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.D.H. 1989b. Size and structure of collection: the case for core collection. In: Hodgkin, T., Brown, A.D.H., Hintum, T.J.L., van Morales, E.A.V. (eds.), The Use of Plant Genetic Resources. John Wiley & Sons, Baffins Lane, Chichester, UK, pp. 136–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnes, B.A., Slade, N.A. 1982. Some comments on niche analysis in canonical space. Ecology 63:888–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coudun, C., Gégout, J.C. 2006. The derivation of species response curves with Gaussian logistic regression is sensitive to sampling intensity and curve characteristics. Ecological Modelling 199:164–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, O.H., Brown, A.D.H. 1984. Current Plant Genetic Resources – A Critical Appraisal. In: Genetics New Frontiers, Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Genetics (Vol. 4, pp. 3–13). Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimaret-Carpentier, C., Dray, S., Pascal, J. 2003. Broad-scale biodiversity pattern of the endemic tree flora of the Western Ghats (India) using canonical correlation analysis of herbarium records. Ecography 26:429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, J. 1917. Field tests of theories concerning distributional control. Am. Nat. 51:115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, J. 1924. Geography of evolution. Ecology 5:225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan, A., Thuiller, W. 2005. Predicting species ditribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 8:993–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. 1936. Relations between two sets of varieties. Biometrika 28:321–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G.E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 22:145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J.B., Omland, K.S. 2004.Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:101–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mansat, P. 1995. “Préface”. In: Prospéri, J.M., Guy, P., Balfourier, F. (eds.), Ressources génétiques des plantes fourragères et à gazon (pp. 9–12). Paris: BRG-INRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A. 1997. Generalized Linear Models. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke, N.J.D. 1991. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78:691–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noirot, M., Hamon, S., Anthony, F. 1996. The principal component scoring: a new method of constituting a core collection using quantitative data. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 43:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J., Ferrier, S. 2000a. An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling 128:127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J., Ferrier, S. 2000b. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling 133:225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosperi, J.M., Jenczewski, E., Angevain, M., Ronfort, J. 2005. Morphologic and agronomic diversity of wild genetic resources of Medicago sativa L. collected in Spain. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 53:843–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampoux, J.P., Huyghe, C. 2009. Contribution of ploidy-level variation and adaptive trait diversity to the environmental distribution of taxa in the ‘fine-leaved fescue’ lineage (genus Festuca subg. Festuca). Journal of Biogeography (36):1978–1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, D.J., Brown, A.D.H. 1993. Conservation of allelic richness in wild crop relatives is aided by assessment of genetic markers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:10623–10627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller, W., Araújo, M.B., Lavorel, S. 2004. Do we need land-cover data to model species distributions in Europe? J. Biogeogr. 31:353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J.M., Raybould, A.F., Ball, T., Gray, A.J., Hayward, M.D. 1998. Genetic structure in the perennial grasses Lolium perenne and Agrostis curtisii. Heredity 81:556–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintle, B.A., McCarthy, M.A., Volinsky, C.T., Kavanagh, R.P. 2003. The use of bayesian model averaging to better represent uncertainty in ecological models. Conserv. Biol. 17:1579–1590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaniewski, A.E., Lehmann, A., Overton, J.M.C. 2002. Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns. Ecological Modelling 157:261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Paul Sampoux .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sampoux, JP., Badeau, V. (2010). Empirical Niche Modelling of the Spontaneous Diversity of Forage and Turf Species to Improve Collection and Ex Situ Conservation. In: Huyghe, C. (eds) Sustainable use of Genetic Diversity in Forage and Turf Breeding. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8706-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics