Abstract
Rational sampling of the spontaneous diversity of forage and turf species requires an a priori knowledge of the range of environmental conditions suitable for these species. We introduce some concepts and methods for investigating the environmental range of species by empirical modelling of species ecological niche, and we suggest how such investigations could help to plan collection campaigns and to improve the choice of core-collections. The empirical modelling of the ecological niche of a species consists of building a function of environmental parameters predicting the presence of the species from a calibration dataset including observed presence-absence or abundance records of the species and environmental data at observation sites. We emphasize that data from collection campaigns of plant breeders are valuable information for niche modelling. We introduce two methods for investigating the environmental distribution of species and for niche modelling based on presence-absence data: the canonical correlation analysis and the logistic regression. We give examples combining niche model and GIS software that may contribute to organize collection campaigns. We suggest that models predicting probability of presence of species may be useful for the selection of core-collections. Such models may help to delineate geographically isolated areas of presence of species that should be sampled separately for selecting a core-collection. In each isolated area of presence, we propose to stratify the accessions in clusters according to the predicted probability of presence of the species in collection sites, and to select accessions in each cluster.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Araujo, M., Guisan, A. 2006. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J. Biogeogr. 33:1677–1688.
Austin, M. 2007. Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling 200:1–19.
Balfourier, F., Charmet, G. 1991. Relationships between agronomic characters and ecogeographical factors in a collection of French perennial ryegrass populations. Agronomie 11:645–657.
Balfourier, F., Charmet, G., Prosperi, J.M., Goulard, M., Monestiez, P. 1998. Comparison of different spatial strategies for sampling a core collection of natural populations of fodder crops. Genet. Sel. Evol. 30(Suppl. 1):S215–S235.
Bataillon, T.M., David, J.L., Schoen, D.J. 1996. Neutral genetic markers and conservation genetics: Simulated germplasm collections. Genetics 144:409–417.
Brown, A.D.H. 1989a. Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31:818–824.
Brown, A.D.H. 1989b. Size and structure of collection: the case for core collection. In: Hodgkin, T., Brown, A.D.H., Hintum, T.J.L., van Morales, E.A.V. (eds.), The Use of Plant Genetic Resources. John Wiley & Sons, Baffins Lane, Chichester, UK, pp. 136–156.
Carnes, B.A., Slade, N.A. 1982. Some comments on niche analysis in canonical space. Ecology 63:888–893.
Coudun, C., Gégout, J.C. 2006. The derivation of species response curves with Gaussian logistic regression is sensitive to sampling intensity and curve characteristics. Ecological Modelling 199:164–175.
Frankel, O.H., Brown, A.D.H. 1984. Current Plant Genetic Resources – A Critical Appraisal. In: Genetics New Frontiers, Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Genetics (Vol. 4, pp. 3–13). Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.
Gimaret-Carpentier, C., Dray, S., Pascal, J. 2003. Broad-scale biodiversity pattern of the endemic tree flora of the Western Ghats (India) using canonical correlation analysis of herbarium records. Ecography 26:429–444.
Grinnell, J. 1917. Field tests of theories concerning distributional control. Am. Nat. 51:115–128.
Grinnell, J. 1924. Geography of evolution. Ecology 5:225–229.
Guisan, A., Thuiller, W. 2005. Predicting species ditribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 8:993–1009.
Hotelling, H. 1936. Relations between two sets of varieties. Biometrika 28:321–377.
Hutchinson, G.E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 22:145–159.
Johnson, J.B., Omland, K.S. 2004.Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:101–102.
Mansat, P. 1995. “Préface”. In: Prospéri, J.M., Guy, P., Balfourier, F. (eds.), Ressources génétiques des plantes fourragères et à gazon (pp. 9–12). Paris: BRG-INRA.
McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A. 1997. Generalized Linear Models. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman & Hall, London.
Nagelkerke, N.J.D. 1991. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78:691–692.
Noirot, M., Hamon, S., Anthony, F. 1996. The principal component scoring: a new method of constituting a core collection using quantitative data. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 43:1–6.
Pearce, J., Ferrier, S. 2000a. An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling 128:127–147.
Pearce, J., Ferrier, S. 2000b. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling 133:225–245.
Prosperi, J.M., Jenczewski, E., Angevain, M., Ronfort, J. 2005. Morphologic and agronomic diversity of wild genetic resources of Medicago sativa L. collected in Spain. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 53:843–856.
Sampoux, J.P., Huyghe, C. 2009. Contribution of ploidy-level variation and adaptive trait diversity to the environmental distribution of taxa in the ‘fine-leaved fescue’ lineage (genus Festuca subg. Festuca). Journal of Biogeography (36):1978–1993.
Schoen, D.J., Brown, A.D.H. 1993. Conservation of allelic richness in wild crop relatives is aided by assessment of genetic markers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:10623–10627.
Thuiller, W., Araújo, M.B., Lavorel, S. 2004. Do we need land-cover data to model species distributions in Europe? J. Biogeogr. 31:353–361.
Warren, J.M., Raybould, A.F., Ball, T., Gray, A.J., Hayward, M.D. 1998. Genetic structure in the perennial grasses Lolium perenne and Agrostis curtisii. Heredity 81:556–562.
Wintle, B.A., McCarthy, M.A., Volinsky, C.T., Kavanagh, R.P. 2003. The use of bayesian model averaging to better represent uncertainty in ecological models. Conserv. Biol. 17:1579–1590.
Zaniewski, A.E., Lehmann, A., Overton, J.M.C. 2002. Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns. Ecological Modelling 157:261–280.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sampoux, JP., Badeau, V. (2010). Empirical Niche Modelling of the Spontaneous Diversity of Forage and Turf Species to Improve Collection and Ex Situ Conservation. In: Huyghe, C. (eds) Sustainable use of Genetic Diversity in Forage and Turf Breeding. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8706-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8706-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8705-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8706-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)