Abstract
The marine geoid defines the hydrostatic equilibrium shape that sea level would take in the absence of tides, currents and winds. The geoid is not directly observable, but its height above a reference ellipsoid may be calculated from a model of the Earth’s gravity field. Satellite altimeters measure the instantaneous sea surface height, which is the sum of the geoid plus the dynamic topography associated with the ocean’s responses to tidal and atmospheric forcings. In the early days of altimetric oceanography, knowledge of the geoid was poor and so altimeters are usually placed in exact repeat orbits to facilitate observation of the temporal variations in sea surface height. Recent gravity field models have geoid height errors around 5 cm and geoid slope errors around 1.5 μrad. Errors in the models are primarily at full wavelengths shorter than 20 km, so that some dynamic topography signals may now be directly observed. While satellite gravimetry from missions such as GRACE has improved the long wavelength geoid, there is considerable geoid power at wavelengths too short to be measured by gravimetry at orbital altitude. Determination of the geoid at mesoscale and shorter wavelengths has come from altimetry. Careful filtering has allowed to separate the geoidal height and ocean dynamics signals in the altimeter data, and thereby to refine the marine geoid. Verification of this comes from comparison of marine gravity field models against ship gravimetry. Further improvements in the accuracy of the marine geoid will require a satellite altimeter mission with improved signal-to-noise ratio and a spatially dense (less than 5 km) network of groud tracks. One may hope that CryoSat-2 will offer some improvement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Backus G, Parker R, Constable C (1996) Foundations of geomagnetism, Cambridge University Press, New York
Bruns EH (1828) Die figure der erde. Publikation Königl. Preussisch. Geodätisches Institut, P. Stankiewicz Buchdruckerei, Berlin
Chapman M, Bodine J (1979) Considerations of the indirect effect in marine gravity modelling. J Geophys Res 84(B8):3889–3892
Ekman M (1989) Impacts of geodynamic phenomena on systems for height and gravity. Bull Geodesique 63(3):281–296
Goff JA, Smith WHF, Marks KM (2004) The contributions of abyssal hill morphology and noise to altimetric gravity fabric. Oceanography 17(1):24–37
Haxby WF, Karner GD, LaBrecque JL, Weissel JK (1983) Digital images of combined oceanic and continental data sets and their use in tectonic studies. Eos Trans AGU 64(52):995–1004
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco
Jacobs GA, Barron CN, Rhodes RC (2001) Mesoscale characteristics. J Geophys Res 106(C9):19581–19595
Mauritzen C, Polzin KL, McCartney MS, Millard RC, West-Mack DE (2002) Evidence in hydrography and density finestructure for enhanced vertical mixing over the Mid-Atlantic ridge. J Geophys Res 107, doi:10.1019/2001JC000801
Olgiati A, Balmino G, Sarrailh M, Green CM (1995) Gravity anomalies from satellite altimetry: comparison between computation via geoid heights and via deflections of the vertical. Bull Geodesique 69:252–260
Parker RL (1973) The rapid calculation of potential anomalies. Geophys J R Astron Soc 31:447–455
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2008) An Earth Gravipotential Model to Degree 2160: EGM2008. 2008 General Assembly of the European Geophysical Union, Vienna Austria, April 13–18, http://users.auth.gr/∼kotsaki/IAG_JWG/EGM08/NPavlis&al_EGU2008.pdf
Rapp RH (1994) Global geoid determination. In: Vanicek X, Christou X (eds.) Geoid and its geophysical interpretations, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 57–73
Sandwell DT (1984) A detailed view of the South Pacific geoid from satellite altimetry. J Geophys Res 89(B2):1089–1104
Sandwell DT, Smith WHF (1997) Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS-1 satellite altimetry. J Geophys Res 102(B5):10039–10054
Sandwell DT, Smith WHF (2009) Global marine gravity from retracked Geosat and ERS-1 altimetry: ridge segmentation versus spreading rate. J Geophys Res 114:B01411, doi:10.1029/2008JB006008
Scharroo R, Smith HF (2009) Mesoscale ocean dynamics observed by satellite altimeters in non-repeat orbits. Geophys Res Lett 36:L06601, doi:10.1029/2008GL036530
Smith WHF (1998) Seafloor tectonic fabric from satellite altimetry. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 26:697–738
Watts AB (2001) Isostasy and flexure of the lithosphere, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wessel P, Watts AB (1988) On the accuracy of marine gravity measurements. J Geophys Res 93(B1):393–413
Acknowledgements
A. B. Watts and D. T. Sandwell introduced me to this topic. K. M. Marks, J. L. Lillibridge, and an anonymous reviewer kindly reviewed the manuscript. Any errors are my own. The manuscript contents are solely the opinions of the author and do not constitute a statement of policy, decision, or position on behalf of NOAA or the US Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, W.H.F. (2010). The Marine Geoid and Satellite Altimetry. In: Barale, V., Gower, J., Alberotanza, L. (eds) Oceanography from Space. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8681-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8681-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8680-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8681-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)