Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter examines four major approaches to a values education pedagogy in schools. These are, namely, the trait approach that is based on moral absolutism and that finds expression in explicit teaching or through moral biography; values clarification that is based on moral relativity; the cognitive developmental approach that is based on facilitating transition through invariant stages and is practised through discussion of moral dilemmas; and role play involving the fostering of multiple perspectives. While the chapter addresses the theory underlying each approach and their respective strengths and limitations, it focuses on classroom practice and pedagogy. The author has observed over 100 lessons incorporating and integrating the four approaches and has conducted many demonstration lessons. The author shares his insights about practice and the significance of language in promoting learning about values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brady, L. (1989). Feel value act (2nd ed.). Melbourne, VIC: Collins Dove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, L. (2006). Collaborative learning in action. Frenchs Forest, Sydney, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAZR. (2003). Tales of the Todd. Day 14 – Fact Sheet 31: Values clarification. Centre for Arid Zone Research (CAZR), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO). Available at http://www.cazr.csiro.au/scienceweek2003/resources/F31_day14.pdf

  • DEST. (2005a). National framework for Values Education in Australian schools. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). Available at http://www.curriculum.edu.au/values/default.asp?id=8757

  • DEST. (2005b). Values for Australian schooling professional learning resources. Carlton South, VIC: Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST).

    Google Scholar 

  • DET. (2004). Values in NSW public schools. Sydney, NSW: New South Wales Department of Education and Training (DET).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, R., & Jones, T. (1975). Teaching strategies for moral dilemmas. An application of Kohlberg’s theory of moral development to the social studies classroom. Social Education, 39, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1975). The cognitive developmental approach to moral education. Phi Delta Kappan, 56, 670–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1980). Kohlberg. In B. Munsey (Ed.), Moral development, moral education and Kohlberg. Basic issues in philosophy, psychology, religion and education. AL: Religious Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Gilligan, C. (1971). The adolescent as philosopher. Daedalus, 100, 1051–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipe, D. (n.d.). A critical analysis of values clarification. Apologetics Press, Inc. Available at http://www.apologeticspress.org

  • Lovat, T., & Clement, N. (2008). Quality teaching and values education: Coalescing for effective learning. Journal of Moral Education, 37,1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen, T. W. (2005). Values education through thinking, feeling and doing. The Social Educator, 23, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L., & Narvaev, D. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of moral and character education. New York: London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raths, L. E., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. B. (1978). Values and teaching. Ohio: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, L., Gauld, J., Cole-Adams, J., & Connolly, A. (2007). Teaching values. Newtown, NSW: Primary English Teachers’ Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaftel, F. R. (1967). Role playing for social values. NJ; Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, S. B., Howe, L. W., & Kirschenbaum, H. (1972). A handbook of practical strategies for teachers and students. New York: Hart Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. D., & Chambers, E. A. (2006). The social mediation of a moral dilemma: Appropriating the moral tools of others. Journal of Moral Education, 35, 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upright, R. L. (2002). To tell a tale: The use of moral dilemmas to increase empathy in the elementary school child. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30, 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ments, M. (1983). The effective use of role play: A handbook for teachers and trainers. London: Kogan Page/New York: Nichols Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurie Brady .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brady, L. (2010). Classroom-Based Practice in Values Education. In: Lovat, T., Toomey, R., Clement, N. (eds) International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Wellbeing. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8675-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics