Skip to main content

Research Libraries in the Twenty-First Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research

Part of the book series: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 25))

  • 3209 Accesses

Abstract

Libraries are a key resource in maintaining research, funding and teaching capabilities of research extensive universities today, but they rarely receive significant research attention, treated instead as a kind of “add-on” to other considerations. Yet research libraries and their search and linking capabilities are changing the way in which faculty and students alike work, and some suggest, the way in which we even think, about knowledge, knowledge production, and our relationships with the world. Libraries—and librarians—are undertaking roles which go far beyond collecting, cataloguing, storing and retrieving information, and are now working as knowledge producers themselves. As well, librarians in research extensive universities are now key to organizing new information and knowledge, creating new accessibility paths for faculty and students. This chapter also considers the role of major research libraries in teaching in the knowledge economy; contributing to the development of new metrics for evaluating libraries, their collections and their services; the economics of collections and collection development, including space and space renovation which meets new teaching needs and modes; the role of funding and development; the creation and expansion of digital libraries and archives; and libraries’ contributions to the creation of research collaboratives across time and space.

Today we have a similar opportunity to invest in research and education to bring the world closer together, improve our environment, and fulfill the age-old dream of every human being: gaining ready access to humanity’s store of information. This era and what we are building go by many names, including Cyberspace, Global Information Infrastructure, Infobahn, Information Age, Information (Super) Highway, Interspace, and Paperless Society. They are all supported by networking (e.g., the Internet). However, their essence is information. Information is what flows over the networks, what is presented to us by our consumer electronics devices, what is manipulated by our computers, and what is stored in our libraries.Fox, Akscyn, Furuta, and Leggett (1995, p. 23)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ARL: A Bimonthly Report. (2002). Collections and access for the 21st-century scholar; Changing roles of research libraries, 225 (December). Retrieved 3/2/09, from http://www.arl.org/newsltr/225/

  • Arms, W. (2000). Digital libraries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden, D. (2005, October). Dialogue: Let 2,000 petabytes bloom. Discover, 26(10), 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, T. (2007). Archive fever. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(46), A8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps toward an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battin, P. (1982). Libraries, computers and scholarship. Wilson Library Bulletin, 56, 580–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bement, A. L. (2007, January 5). Cyberinfrastructure: The second revolution. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53, B5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee, J. H., & Lassila, O. (2001, May). The semantic Web. Scientific American, 284, 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. L. (1995). On great service: A framework for action. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. (2000). From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: Access to information in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. (2003, Spring). The invisible library: Paradox of the global information infrastructure. Library Trends, 51(4), 652–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, D. S. (2001, Summer). Information technology literacy: Task knowledge and mental models. Library Trends, 50(1), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branin, J. J. (1998). Shifting boundaries: Managing research library collections at the beginning of the Twenty-first century. Collection Management, 23(4), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branin, J., Groen, F., & Thorin, S. (1999, November 12–14). The changing nature of collection management in research libraries. Paper presented at the Creating New Strategies for Cooperative Collection Development Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakstone, E. (2005, September 30). Librarians can look forward to an exhilarating future. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, B20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breivik, P. S., & Gee, E. G. (2006). Higher education in the internet age: Creating a strategic edge. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. (2007). 20 years of archival ambition. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(48), A10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, S. (2002). Students and faculty members turn first to online library materials, study finds. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(8). Retrieved on February 2, 2005, from http://weblinks3.epnet.com/ citation.asp?tb+1&_ua=bo+B%5F+shn+1+db+aphjnh

  • Carlson, S. (2003). Libraries’ consortium conundrum. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50, 7, October 10. Retrieved 2/11/2005, from http://weblinks3.epnet.com/citation/asp?tb+1&_us+bt+ID++CRN+shn+1+db+aphj

  • Carlson, S. (2005a). Special effects: College librarians highlight rare collections to help build support for their institutions. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(41), A23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, S. (2005b, September 30). Thoughtful design keeps new libraries relevant: Not everything students want and need is online. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, B1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, S. (2005c). Not-yet-rare collections: Libraries preserve pop culture. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(41), A25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, S. (2007). Young librarians, talking ‘bout their generation. Chronicle of Higher Education, LIV, 8, A28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloonan, M. V., & Harvey, R. (2007). Preserving cultural heritage: Introduction. Library Trends, 56(1), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure. (2000). The digital dilemma: Intellectual property in the information age. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C. C. (2001). A mixed-methods approach to the identification and measurement of academic library service quality constructs: LibQUAL+™. Unpublished dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombe, R. J. (1998). The cultural life of intellectual properties: Authorship, appropriation, and the law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covi, L., & Kling, R. (1996). Organizational dimensions of effective digital library use: Closed rational and open natural systems models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(9), 672–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gennaro, R. (1982). Libraries, technology and the information marketplace. Library Journal, 107, 1045–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Destefano, P. and Walters, T.O. (2007) A Natural Collaboration: Preservation for Archival Collections in ARL Libraries. Library Trends, 56(1), 230–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallows, J. (2006). Artificial intelligentsia. The Atlantic Monthly, 298(3), 146–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., & Shuster, J. H. (1998). The new academic generation: A profession in transition. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. A., Akscyn, R. J., Furuta, R. K., & Leggett, J. J. (Eds.) (1995). Editors’ introduction: Digital libraries. Communication of the ACM, 38(4), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, T. J., & Lynch, B. P. (Eds.) (1982). Priorities for academic libraries. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, D., Tiedt, D., & Smith, A., (2007, January 5). Interview: The library as search engine. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53, B24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, F., Cook, C., Lincoln, Y. S., Thompson, B., and Kyrillidoo, M. (2000). Service effectiveness in academic research libraries. Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE), Department of Education, $321,214. Proposal for funding in response to a Request for Proposal, FIPSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, M. Y. (2005, March 11). Don’t get goggle-eyed over Google’s plan to digitize. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, B20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisle, W. L. (2005, September 30). Reference questions in the library of the future. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, B6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, B., Hardesty, L., & O’Shea, P. (2008). Academic Libraries: 2006 (NCES 2008-337). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved July 3, 2009, from http://necs.ed.gov/pubsearch

  • Holton, B., Vaden, K., & O’Shea, P. (2006). Academic libraries: 2004 (NCES 2007-301). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved November 2, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

  • Jacoby, R. (1987). The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, A., & Rieger, O. (2000). Moving theory into practice: Digital imaging for libraries and archives. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krafft, D. B. (2002). A model for simple metadata-based services. National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Communications, April 11. Retrieved July 19, 2003, from http://comm.nsdlib.org/projects/citi/document/SMBS/en/1/SMBS.html

  • Kyrillidou, M., Cook, C., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008, March 3–6). Digital library service quality: What does it look like? Paper presented at the annual meeting, Digital Libraries Association, Corfu, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyrillidou, M. Heath, F., Cook, C., Thompson, B., Lincoln, Y. S., & Webster, D. (2007, August 13–16). DigiQUAL™: A digital library evaluation service. Paper presented at the 7th annual Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services (PM7), Stellenbosch University, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddy, E. D., Sutton, S., Paik, W, Allen, E., Harwell, S., Monsour, M., et al. (2001, June 24–28). Breaking the metadata generation bottleneck: Preliminary findings. Journal of the Committee on Digital Libraries, 1, 464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Lechuga, V. (2006, October 18–19). Research libraries as knowledge producers: A shifting context for policy and funding: Final technical report to the Task Force on New Ways of Measuring Collections, Association of Research Libraries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lougee, W. P. (2002). Diffuse libraries: Emergent roles for the research library in the digital age. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangan, K. S. (2005). Packing up the books. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(43), A27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E. (Ed.) (1999). Critical anthropology now: Unexpected contexts, shifting constituencies, changing agendas. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlino, M., Sumner, T., Fulker, D., Manduca, C., & Mogk, D. (2001). The digital library for earth system education: Building community, building the library. Communications of the ACM, 44(5), 80–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCray, A. T., & Gallagher, M. E. (2001). Principles for digital library development. Communication of the ACM, 44(5), 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, K. (2007). Owning culture: Authorship, ownership & intellectual property law. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, B. B. (1984). Academic libraries: The changing knowledge centers of colleges and universities. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Inquiry into Scholarly Communication. (1979). Scholarly communication: The report of the National Enquiry. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67, 420–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1993). Research note: More on improving quality measurement. Journal of Retailing, 69, 140–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Research Libraries Group. (1996). Preserving digital information: Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. The Commission on Preservation and Access and The Research Libraries Group, Inc. Washington, DC; The Commission on Preservation and Access (printed version) and Mountain View, CA: The Research Libraries Group (Web-based version).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, C., & Price, G. (2003). The invisible web: Uncovering sources search engines can’t see. Library Trends, 52(2), 282–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuster, J. H. (1998). Reconfiguring the professoriate. Academe, 84(1), 48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. S., & Casserly, C. M. (2006, September/October). The promise of open educational resources. Change, 38, 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suplee, C. (with N. Holmes) (2005). Information takes shape. Discover, 26(10), 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgovnick, M. (2008). File under fleeting: Archives are more ephemeral than they seem. The Chronicle Review, 55(2), B14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, S. (2007, February 23). The new library professional. Chronicle of Higher Education, LIII, 25, C1, C4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. R. (2005). From Gutenberg to Google: Five views on the search-engine company’s project to digitize library books. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(39), A24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerner, C., (Ed.) (2003). Culture and the question of rights: Forests, coasts, and seas in Southeast Asia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvonna S. Lincoln .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lincoln, Y.S. (2010). Research Libraries in the Twenty-First Century. In: Smart, J. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8598-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics