Abstract
Libraries are a key resource in maintaining research, funding and teaching capabilities of research extensive universities today, but they rarely receive significant research attention, treated instead as a kind of “add-on” to other considerations. Yet research libraries and their search and linking capabilities are changing the way in which faculty and students alike work, and some suggest, the way in which we even think, about knowledge, knowledge production, and our relationships with the world. Libraries—and librarians—are undertaking roles which go far beyond collecting, cataloguing, storing and retrieving information, and are now working as knowledge producers themselves. As well, librarians in research extensive universities are now key to organizing new information and knowledge, creating new accessibility paths for faculty and students. This chapter also considers the role of major research libraries in teaching in the knowledge economy; contributing to the development of new metrics for evaluating libraries, their collections and their services; the economics of collections and collection development, including space and space renovation which meets new teaching needs and modes; the role of funding and development; the creation and expansion of digital libraries and archives; and libraries’ contributions to the creation of research collaboratives across time and space.
Today we have a similar opportunity to invest in research and education to bring the world closer together, improve our environment, and fulfill the age-old dream of every human being: gaining ready access to humanity’s store of information. This era and what we are building go by many names, including Cyberspace, Global Information Infrastructure, Infobahn, Information Age, Information (Super) Highway, Interspace, and Paperless Society. They are all supported by networking (e.g., the Internet). However, their essence is information. Information is what flows over the networks, what is presented to us by our consumer electronics devices, what is manipulated by our computers, and what is stored in our libraries.Fox, Akscyn, Furuta, and Leggett (1995, p. 23)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ARL: A Bimonthly Report. (2002). Collections and access for the 21st-century scholar; Changing roles of research libraries, 225 (December). Retrieved 3/2/09, from http://www.arl.org/newsltr/225/
Arms, W. (2000). Digital libraries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baden, D. (2005, October). Dialogue: Let 2,000 petabytes bloom. Discover, 26(10), 50.
Bartlett, T. (2007). Archive fever. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(46), A8–13.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps toward an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Battin, P. (1982). Libraries, computers and scholarship. Wilson Library Bulletin, 56, 580–583.
Bement, A. L. (2007, January 5). Cyberinfrastructure: The second revolution. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53, B5–6
Berners-Lee, J. H., & Lassila, O. (2001, May). The semantic Web. Scientific American, 284, 34–43.
Berry, L. L. (1995). On great service: A framework for action. New York: Free Press.
Borgman, C. (2000). From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: Access to information in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Borgman, C. (2003, Spring). The invisible library: Paradox of the global information infrastructure. Library Trends, 51(4), 652–674.
Brandt, D. S. (2001, Summer). Information technology literacy: Task knowledge and mental models. Library Trends, 50(1), 73–86.
Branin, J. J. (1998). Shifting boundaries: Managing research library collections at the beginning of the Twenty-first century. Collection Management, 23(4), 1–17.
Branin, J., Groen, F., & Thorin, S. (1999, November 12–14). The changing nature of collection management in research libraries. Paper presented at the Creating New Strategies for Cooperative Collection Development Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.
Breakstone, E. (2005, September 30). Librarians can look forward to an exhilarating future. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, B20.
Breivik, P. S., & Gee, E. G. (2006). Higher education in the internet age: Creating a strategic edge. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Byrne, R. (2007). 20 years of archival ambition. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(48), A10–11.
Carlson, S. (2002). Students and faculty members turn first to online library materials, study finds. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(8). Retrieved on February 2, 2005, from http://weblinks3.epnet.com/ citation.asp?tb+1&_ua=bo+B%5F+shn+1+db+aphjnh
Carlson, S. (2003). Libraries’ consortium conundrum. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50, 7, October 10. Retrieved 2/11/2005, from http://weblinks3.epnet.com/citation/asp?tb+1&_us+bt+ID++CRN+shn+1+db+aphj
Carlson, S. (2005a). Special effects: College librarians highlight rare collections to help build support for their institutions. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(41), A23–24.
Carlson, S. (2005b, September 30). Thoughtful design keeps new libraries relevant: Not everything students want and need is online. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, B1–5.
Carlson, S. (2005c). Not-yet-rare collections: Libraries preserve pop culture. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(41), A25.
Carlson, S. (2007). Young librarians, talking ‘bout their generation. Chronicle of Higher Education, LIV, 8, A28–30.
Cloonan, M. V., & Harvey, R. (2007). Preserving cultural heritage: Introduction. Library Trends, 56(1), 1–3.
Committee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure. (2000). The digital dilemma: Intellectual property in the information age. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Cook, C. C. (2001). A mixed-methods approach to the identification and measurement of academic library service quality constructs: LibQUAL+™. Unpublished dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Coombe, R. J. (1998). The cultural life of intellectual properties: Authorship, appropriation, and the law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Covi, L., & Kling, R. (1996). Organizational dimensions of effective digital library use: Closed rational and open natural systems models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(9), 672–689.
De Gennaro, R. (1982). Libraries, technology and the information marketplace. Library Journal, 107, 1045–1054.
Destefano, P. and Walters, T.O. (2007) A Natural Collaboration: Preservation for Archival Collections in ARL Libraries. Library Trends, 56(1), 230–258.
Fallows, J. (2006). Artificial intelligentsia. The Atlantic Monthly, 298(3), 146–149.
Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., & Shuster, J. H. (1998). The new academic generation: A profession in transition. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fox, E. A., Akscyn, R. J., Furuta, R. K., & Leggett, J. J. (Eds.) (1995). Editors’ introduction: Digital libraries. Communication of the ACM, 38(4), 23–28.
Galvin, T. J., & Lynch, B. P. (Eds.) (1982). Priorities for academic libraries. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Greenstein, D., Tiedt, D., & Smith, A., (2007, January 5). Interview: The library as search engine. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53, B24–25.
Heath, F., Cook, C., Lincoln, Y. S., Thompson, B., and Kyrillidoo, M. (2000). Service effectiveness in academic research libraries. Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE), Department of Education, $321,214. Proposal for funding in response to a Request for Proposal, FIPSE.
Herring, M. Y. (2005, March 11). Don’t get goggle-eyed over Google’s plan to digitize. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, B20.
Hisle, W. L. (2005, September 30). Reference questions in the library of the future. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, B6–8.
Holton, B., Hardesty, L., & O’Shea, P. (2008). Academic Libraries: 2006 (NCES 2008-337). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved July 3, 2009, from http://necs.ed.gov/pubsearch
Holton, B., Vaden, K., & O’Shea, P. (2006). Academic libraries: 2004 (NCES 2007-301). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved November 2, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
Jacoby, R. (1987). The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. New York: Basic Books.
Kenney, A., & Rieger, O. (2000). Moving theory into practice: Digital imaging for libraries and archives. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.
Krafft, D. B. (2002). A model for simple metadata-based services. National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Communications, April 11. Retrieved July 19, 2003, from http://comm.nsdlib.org/projects/citi/document/SMBS/en/1/SMBS.html
Kyrillidou, M., Cook, C., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008, March 3–6). Digital library service quality: What does it look like? Paper presented at the annual meeting, Digital Libraries Association, Corfu, Greece.
Kyrillidou, M. Heath, F., Cook, C., Thompson, B., Lincoln, Y. S., & Webster, D. (2007, August 13–16). DigiQUAL™: A digital library evaluation service. Paper presented at the 7th annual Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services (PM7), Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Liddy, E. D., Sutton, S., Paik, W, Allen, E., Harwell, S., Monsour, M., et al. (2001, June 24–28). Breaking the metadata generation bottleneck: Preliminary findings. Journal of the Committee on Digital Libraries, 1, 464.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Lechuga, V. (2006, October 18–19). Research libraries as knowledge producers: A shifting context for policy and funding: Final technical report to the Task Force on New Ways of Measuring Collections, Association of Research Libraries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.
Lougee, W. P. (2002). Diffuse libraries: Emergent roles for the research library in the digital age. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
Mangan, K. S. (2005). Packing up the books. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(43), A27–28.
Marcus, G. E. (Ed.) (1999). Critical anthropology now: Unexpected contexts, shifting constituencies, changing agendas. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
Marlino, M., Sumner, T., Fulker, D., Manduca, C., & Mogk, D. (2001). The digital library for earth system education: Building community, building the library. Communications of the ACM, 44(5), 80–81.
McCray, A. T., & Gallagher, M. E. (2001). Principles for digital library development. Communication of the ACM, 44(5), 49–54.
McLeod, K. (2007). Owning culture: Authorship, ownership & intellectual property law. New York: Peter Lang.
Moran, B. B. (1984). Academic libraries: The changing knowledge centers of colleges and universities. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
National Inquiry into Scholarly Communication. (1979). Scholarly communication: The report of the National Enquiry. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12–40.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67, 420–450.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1993). Research note: More on improving quality measurement. Journal of Retailing, 69, 140–147.
Research Libraries Group. (1996). Preserving digital information: Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. The Commission on Preservation and Access and The Research Libraries Group, Inc. Washington, DC; The Commission on Preservation and Access (printed version) and Mountain View, CA: The Research Libraries Group (Web-based version).
Sherman, C., & Price, G. (2003). The invisible web: Uncovering sources search engines can’t see. Library Trends, 52(2), 282–298.
Shuster, J. H. (1998). Reconfiguring the professoriate. Academe, 84(1), 48–53.
Smith, M. S., & Casserly, C. M. (2006, September/October). The promise of open educational resources. Change, 38, 8–17.
Suplee, C. (with N. Holmes) (2005). Information takes shape. Discover, 26(10), 50–51.
Torgovnick, M. (2008). File under fleeting: Archives are more ephemeral than they seem. The Chronicle Review, 55(2), B14–16.
Wilder, S. (2007, February 23). The new library professional. Chronicle of Higher Education, LIII, 25, C1, C4.
Young, J. R. (2005). From Gutenberg to Google: Five views on the search-engine company’s project to digitize library books. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(39), A24–27.
Zerner, C., (Ed.) (2003). Culture and the question of rights: Forests, coasts, and seas in Southeast Asia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lincoln, Y.S. (2010). Research Libraries in the Twenty-First Century. In: Smart, J. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8598-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8598-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8597-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8598-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)