Skip to main content

Terrorism and the Threat to Multimodal Transport – An Overview

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Security and Environmental Sustainability of Multimodal Transport

Abstract

Terrorist attacks in recent years have demonstrated that the transport sector is the most common target for terrorists due to severe impacts in terms of mass casualties and disruption of the free and safe movement mainly of people, and to a lesser extent, of goods. Such attacks have also further social, economical and political impacts. On-going unsuccessful attempts are testament to the fact that terrorism is a prominent danger to this sector. Transport networks vulnerable to terrorist attacks are being identified as “critical infrastructure” (based on a number of related criteria), and their protection represents a serious challenge nowadays. Limited research in this field has mainly dealt with assessment of vulnerabilities and risks and the development of effective contingency plans that seek to reduce the levels of a given crisis in time and space, mitigate the impact of attacks and restore operations with confidence. Security deficiencies do exist, as well as lack of consistency in terms of provisions and policies. However, since complete protection is unrealistic and economically unfeasible, prioritisation is required. The freight sector, albeit less attractive to the terrorist than the passenger transport sector, demands equal attention, given the fact that the economic values of society depend largely on the smooth operation of the supply chain itself. This paper sets out to provide an overview of the current work and related gaps in conducting threat, vulnerability, and criticality assessments against the potential terrorist attack to the multimodal passenger and freight transport systems, since in most cases a ‘passenger trip’ or a ‘movement of goods’ involves more than one mode. In addition, it looks at the transport supply chain and its resilience to disruptions from such attacks. Finally, measures to prevent, detect, and reduce threats are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Counterterrorism Center, 2007 Report on Terrorism, 30 April 2008, US

    Google Scholar 

  2. Council of the European Union, EU Counter-Terrorism Strategy (14469/4/05), November 2005

    Google Scholar 

  3. Action Plan to Combat Terrorism http://consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/EUplan16090.pdf accessed December 2008

  4. EU NO 2320/2002 REGULATION (EC) OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation security

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van de Voort M., Willis, H., Ortiz, D., Martonosi, S. and Rahman, A. Policy Considerations in Securing the Global Containerized Supply Chain. Presentation at Risk Management Tools for Port Security, Critical Infrastructure and Sustainability, 16 – 19 March 2006, Venice, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Closs D. and McGarell E. Enhancing Security throughout the Supply Chain. Special Report series, IBM Center for the Business of Government, April 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brewster, R. M. and LeVert, R. Identifying vulnerabilities and security management practices in agricultural and food commodity transportation. In Transportation Research Board CD-ROM, Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. CSI Fact Sheet. US Customs and Border Protection. Press Office, US Department of Homeland Security. September 30, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ojah, M. Securing and Facilitating Trade Through U.S. Land Borders Critical Analysis of C-TPAT and FAST Programs. In Transportation Research Record, No 1938, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 30–37, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Consideration and Adoption of the International Shop and Port Facility (ISPS) Code. Conference of Contracting Governments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, Agenda Items 7 and 8. SOLAS/CONF.5/34, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. COMBATING TERRORISM: Threat and Risk Assessments can Help Prioritize and Target Programme Investments. Report to Congressional Requesters, United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ASIS International, Advancing Security Worldwide, Guidelines on General Security Risk Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Critical Infrastructure Protection. Executive Order 13010. Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 138, July 17, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moteff, J., Copeland, C. and Fisher, J. Critical Infrastructures: What Makes an Infrastructure Critical? Report for Congress, No 31556, Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Daisler Jr P., F. A Perspective: Risk Analysis as a Tool for Reducing the Risks of Terrorism”. In Risk Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shahar, Y. Toward a Target-Specific Method of Threat Assessment. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paté-Cornell, M.E. and Guikema, S. Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: a systems analysis approach to setting priorities among countermeasures. In Military Operations Research No. 7, 2002, pp. 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garrick, B. J., Hall, J. E., Kilger, M., McDonald, J. C., O’Toole, T., Probst, P.S., Rindskopf Parker, E., Rosenthal, R., Trivelpiece, A.W., Van Arsdale, L. A. and Zebroski, E. L. Confronting the risks of terrorism: making the right decisions. In Reliability Engineering and System Safety, No. 86, pp. 129–176, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Threat Advisory System Response (TASR) Guideline Considerations and Potential Actions in Response to the Department of Homeland Security Advisory System. ASIS International GDL TASR 09, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haimes, Y.Y. and Thomas Longstaff, T. “The Role of Risk Analysis in the Protection of Critical Infrastructures Against Terrorism”. In Risk Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paté-Cornell, E. and Guikema, S. Probabilistic Modelling of Terrorist Threats: A Systems Analysis Approach to Setting Priorities Among Countermeasures. In Military Operations Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 5–20, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Apostolakis, G.E. and Lemon, D.M. A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism. In Risk Analysis, Washington, Vol. 25, pp. 361–376, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Patterson, S.A. and Apostolakis, G.E. Identification of Critical Locations across Multiple Infrastructures for Terrorist Actions. In Reliability Engineering and System Safety, No. 92, pp. 1183–1203, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tsamboulas, D. and Moraiti, P. “Identification of Potential Target Locations and Attractiveness Assessment due to Terrorism in the Freight Transport, Journal of Transportation Security, Volume 1, pp. 189–207, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abkowitz, M.D. Transportation Risk Management: A new Paradigm. In Transportation Research Board CD-ROM, Washington, D.C., 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sandia National Laboratories, Risk Assessment Methodology and PPS - http://www.sandia.gov/ ram/, accessed on December 9, 2008.

  27. Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED), http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/ccaps/safecomm_ e.htm, accessed on December 9, 2008.

  28. Transit Security Design Considerations - FTA Office of Research Demonstration and Innovation, U.S. DOT, 2004 and Facilities standards for the public building service - GSA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  29. MARITIME SECURITY Better Planning Needed to Help Ensure an Effective Port Security Assessment Program Report to Congressional Requesters, United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jon S. Helmick, Port and maritime security: A research perspective, In Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 1, pp. 15–28, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Michael Wolfe, Technology to Enhance Freight Transportation and Productivity, Appendix to Freight Transportation and Productivity Office of Freight Management and Operations, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Intermodal Freight Security and Technology Workshop, Long Beach, California 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hau L. Lee and Seungjin Whang Higher Supply Chain Security with Lower Cost: Lessons from Total Quality Management, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Barry E. Prentice, Tangible and intangible benefits of transportation security measures, Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 1, pp. 3–14, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Clinton V. Oster & John S. Strong, A review of Transportation Security Administration funding 2001–2007, In Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 1, pp. 37–43, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rice, J.B. and Caniato, F., “Building a secure and resilient supply network”, Supply Chain Management Review, MIT Institute of Technology, Centre of Transportation and Logistics, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tsamboulas, D., Lekka, A.M., Miller, M. and Hintsa, J. “Methodology for development of a supply chain security resilience system” Proceedings in CD-ROM of the 11th World Conference of Transport Research, WCTR, Berkley, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mark B. Salter, Political science perspectives on transportation security, Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 1, pp 29–35, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Ms Panayota Moraiti, Research Associate, Department of Transportation Planning and Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, for her valuable contribution to the drafting of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tsamboulas, D. (2010). Terrorism and the Threat to Multimodal Transport – An Overview. In: Bell, M., Hosseinloo, S., Kanturska, U. (eds) Security and Environmental Sustainability of Multimodal Transport. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8563-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics