Abstract
Terrorist attacks in recent years have demonstrated that the transport sector is the most common target for terrorists due to severe impacts in terms of mass casualties and disruption of the free and safe movement mainly of people, and to a lesser extent, of goods. Such attacks have also further social, economical and political impacts. On-going unsuccessful attempts are testament to the fact that terrorism is a prominent danger to this sector. Transport networks vulnerable to terrorist attacks are being identified as “critical infrastructure” (based on a number of related criteria), and their protection represents a serious challenge nowadays. Limited research in this field has mainly dealt with assessment of vulnerabilities and risks and the development of effective contingency plans that seek to reduce the levels of a given crisis in time and space, mitigate the impact of attacks and restore operations with confidence. Security deficiencies do exist, as well as lack of consistency in terms of provisions and policies. However, since complete protection is unrealistic and economically unfeasible, prioritisation is required. The freight sector, albeit less attractive to the terrorist than the passenger transport sector, demands equal attention, given the fact that the economic values of society depend largely on the smooth operation of the supply chain itself. This paper sets out to provide an overview of the current work and related gaps in conducting threat, vulnerability, and criticality assessments against the potential terrorist attack to the multimodal passenger and freight transport systems, since in most cases a ‘passenger trip’ or a ‘movement of goods’ involves more than one mode. In addition, it looks at the transport supply chain and its resilience to disruptions from such attacks. Finally, measures to prevent, detect, and reduce threats are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
National Counterterrorism Center, 2007 Report on Terrorism, 30 April 2008, US
Council of the European Union, EU Counter-Terrorism Strategy (14469/4/05), November 2005
Action Plan to Combat Terrorism http://consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/EUplan16090.pdf accessed December 2008
EU NO 2320/2002 REGULATION (EC) OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation security
Van de Voort M., Willis, H., Ortiz, D., Martonosi, S. and Rahman, A. Policy Considerations in Securing the Global Containerized Supply Chain. Presentation at Risk Management Tools for Port Security, Critical Infrastructure and Sustainability, 16 – 19 March 2006, Venice, Italy.
Closs D. and McGarell E. Enhancing Security throughout the Supply Chain. Special Report series, IBM Center for the Business of Government, April 2004.
Brewster, R. M. and LeVert, R. Identifying vulnerabilities and security management practices in agricultural and food commodity transportation. In Transportation Research Board CD-ROM, Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2005.
CSI Fact Sheet. US Customs and Border Protection. Press Office, US Department of Homeland Security. September 30, 2006.
Ojah, M. Securing and Facilitating Trade Through U.S. Land Borders Critical Analysis of C-TPAT and FAST Programs. In Transportation Research Record, No 1938, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 30–37, 2005.
Consideration and Adoption of the International Shop and Port Facility (ISPS) Code. Conference of Contracting Governments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, Agenda Items 7 and 8. SOLAS/CONF.5/34, 2002.
COMBATING TERRORISM: Threat and Risk Assessments can Help Prioritize and Target Programme Investments. Report to Congressional Requesters, United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), 1998.
ASIS International, Advancing Security Worldwide, Guidelines on General Security Risk Assessment.
Critical Infrastructure Protection. Executive Order 13010. Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 138, July 17, 1996.
Moteff, J., Copeland, C. and Fisher, J. Critical Infrastructures: What Makes an Infrastructure Critical? Report for Congress, No 31556, Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress, 2002.
Daisler Jr P., F. A Perspective: Risk Analysis as a Tool for Reducing the Risks of Terrorism”. In Risk Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2002.
Shahar, Y. Toward a Target-Specific Method of Threat Assessment. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.
Paté-Cornell, M.E. and Guikema, S. Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: a systems analysis approach to setting priorities among countermeasures. In Military Operations Research No. 7, 2002, pp. 5–20.
Garrick, B. J., Hall, J. E., Kilger, M., McDonald, J. C., O’Toole, T., Probst, P.S., Rindskopf Parker, E., Rosenthal, R., Trivelpiece, A.W., Van Arsdale, L. A. and Zebroski, E. L. Confronting the risks of terrorism: making the right decisions. In Reliability Engineering and System Safety, No. 86, pp. 129–176, 2004.
Threat Advisory System Response (TASR) Guideline Considerations and Potential Actions in Response to the Department of Homeland Security Advisory System. ASIS International GDL TASR 09, 2004.
Haimes, Y.Y. and Thomas Longstaff, T. “The Role of Risk Analysis in the Protection of Critical Infrastructures Against Terrorism”. In Risk Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2002.
Paté-Cornell, E. and Guikema, S. Probabilistic Modelling of Terrorist Threats: A Systems Analysis Approach to Setting Priorities Among Countermeasures. In Military Operations Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 5–20, 2002.
Apostolakis, G.E. and Lemon, D.M. A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism. In Risk Analysis, Washington, Vol. 25, pp. 361–376, 2005.
Patterson, S.A. and Apostolakis, G.E. Identification of Critical Locations across Multiple Infrastructures for Terrorist Actions. In Reliability Engineering and System Safety, No. 92, pp. 1183–1203, 2007.
Tsamboulas, D. and Moraiti, P. “Identification of Potential Target Locations and Attractiveness Assessment due to Terrorism in the Freight Transport, Journal of Transportation Security, Volume 1, pp. 189–207, 2008.
Abkowitz, M.D. Transportation Risk Management: A new Paradigm. In Transportation Research Board CD-ROM, Washington, D.C., 2003.
Sandia National Laboratories, Risk Assessment Methodology and PPS - http://www.sandia.gov/ ram/, accessed on December 9, 2008.
Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED), http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/ccaps/safecomm_ e.htm, accessed on December 9, 2008.
Transit Security Design Considerations - FTA Office of Research Demonstration and Innovation, U.S. DOT, 2004 and Facilities standards for the public building service - GSA, 2000.
MARITIME SECURITY Better Planning Needed to Help Ensure an Effective Port Security Assessment Program Report to Congressional Requesters, United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), 2004.
Jon S. Helmick, Port and maritime security: A research perspective, In Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 1, pp. 15–28, 2008.
Michael Wolfe, Technology to Enhance Freight Transportation and Productivity, Appendix to Freight Transportation and Productivity Office of Freight Management and Operations, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Intermodal Freight Security and Technology Workshop, Long Beach, California 2002.
Hau L. Lee and Seungjin Whang Higher Supply Chain Security with Lower Cost: Lessons from Total Quality Management, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, 2003.
Barry E. Prentice, Tangible and intangible benefits of transportation security measures, Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 1, pp. 3–14, 2008.
Clinton V. Oster & John S. Strong, A review of Transportation Security Administration funding 2001–2007, In Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 1, pp. 37–43, 2008.
Rice, J.B. and Caniato, F., “Building a secure and resilient supply network”, Supply Chain Management Review, MIT Institute of Technology, Centre of Transportation and Logistics, 2003.
Tsamboulas, D., Lekka, A.M., Miller, M. and Hintsa, J. “Methodology for development of a supply chain security resilience system” Proceedings in CD-ROM of the 11th World Conference of Transport Research, WCTR, Berkley, 2007.
Mark B. Salter, Political science perspectives on transportation security, Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 1, pp 29–35, 2008.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Ms Panayota Moraiti, Research Associate, Department of Transportation Planning and Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, for her valuable contribution to the drafting of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tsamboulas, D. (2010). Terrorism and the Threat to Multimodal Transport – An Overview. In: Bell, M., Hosseinloo, S., Kanturska, U. (eds) Security and Environmental Sustainability of Multimodal Transport. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8563-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8563-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8561-0
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8563-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)