Skip to main content

ReUniting Sociological and Psychological Perspectives in/for Science Education An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies of Science Education ((CSSE,volume 2))

Abstract

How we think about phenomena of interest is a function of the cultural and historical position of the field in which the phenomenon of interest appears—in science education phenomena of interest include learning concepts, teaching concepts, teacher and student identities, and motivation. Take the following excerpt from an interview between a graduate student of science education, interested in conceptions and discourses about natural phenomena, and another student at her university. The two have come together, as part of a largely tacit social contract, to produce an interview that has as its content the way in which the interviewee (Mary) thinks about diurnal and seasonal changes. The interviewer utters what Mary clearly hears as a question, but the specific nature, as indicated in her own turn, is not clear to her (turn 02). The question concerns the specific position of the sun in the sky at the moment of the interview. Mary offers a possible hearing of the question, which we might gloss as, “So you are asking me ‘Why is the sun in the sky?’”; the interviewer affirms this hearing (turn 03). After a brief pause, Mary offers an answer, where the position in the sky is explained by the facts that it is daytime and that the sun is moving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a general review of this literature see Roth and Lee 2007; for a review of this literature pertaining to science education alone see Roth et al. 2009.

  2. 2.

    Vološinov (1976) references an article by Vygotsky. But I am not aware of any other points of contact between the Bakhtin group and the psychologist. But there are several texts in which Vygotsky articulates his Marxist position; and it is in this that he has a lot in common with Vološinov, who apparently introduced Marxist thinking and theory into the Bakhtin group.

  3. 3.

    In dialectical theories, moments are identifiable structures within some phenomenon that cannot exist on their own (Roth and Lee 2007). They are a function of other moments and of the whole. Moments therefore are different from elements, which are parts that can be used as they are to build the whole. Moments do not exist apart from the whole.

References

  • Bakhtin, M.M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtine, M.M. [Volochinov, V.N.] (1977). Le marxisme et la philosophie du language: essai d’application de la méthode sociologique en linguistique. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1967). De la grammatologie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1992). Points de suspension: Entretiens. Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2003a). Psyché: Inventions de l’autre I. Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2003b). Psyché: Inventions de l’autre II. Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (First published in 1806)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joslin, P. et al. (2008). NARST: A lived history History. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 157–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Lucas, K.B. (1997). From “truth” to “invented reality”: A discourse analysis of high school physics students’ talk about scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontjew, A.N. (1982). Tätigkeit, Bewusstsein, Persönlichkeit. Köln: Studien zur Kritischen Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2007). Toward a dialectical notion and praxisPraxis of scientific literacy Science literacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39, 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2008a). Constructing communityCommunity (of practice) health and safety. Municipal Engineer, 161, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2008b). The nature of scientific conceptions: A discursive psychological perspective. Educational Research Review , 3, 30–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (in press). Language, learning , context: Talking the talk. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.J. (2006). Contradictions in theorizing and implementing “communities.” Educational Research Review , 1, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory Activity theory. Review of Educational Research , 77, 186–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., Lee, Y.J., & Hsu, P-L. (2009). A tool for changing the world: Possibilities of cultural-historicalActivity cultural-historical activity theoryActivity cultural-historical activity theoryActivity theory to reinvigorate science education. Studies in Science Education , 45, 131–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., Lee, Y.J., & Hwang, S.-W. (2008). Culturing conceptions: From first principles. Cultural Studies of Science Education 3, 231–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (in press). Solidarity and conflict: Aligned and misaligned prosody as a transactional resource in intra- and intercultural communication involving power differences. Cultural Studies of Science Education. DOI: 10.1007/s11422-009-9203-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1996). Collected papers volume IV. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vološinov, V.N. (1976). Freudianism: A Marxist critique. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roth, WM. (2010). ReUniting Sociological and Psychological Perspectives in/for Science Education An Introduction. In: Roth, WM. (eds) Re/Structuring Science Education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3996-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics