Skip to main content

Exploring Reform Ideas for Teaching Algebra: Analysis of Videotaped Episodes and of Conversations About Them

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning Through Teaching Mathematics

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teacher Education ((MTEN,volume 5))

Abstract

This chapter explores the learning experienced by teachers engaged in algebra reform inquiry. The chapter describes two ways of using video episodes in the analysis of learning practices acquired through teaching. First, we perform a comparative analysis of two episodes that involve guided inquiry during whole-group discussion by the same students, taught by the same teacher at a distance of two years. Acquired practices are analyzed by quantifying “initiation–response–evaluation” statements made by the students and the teacher. The analysis sheds light on changes in practices and norms taking place over time. Second, we use the same two video episodes in a qualitative comparative analysis of two groups of teachers reflecting on the video episodes. One group of participants consists of teachers engaged in teaching the same reform algebra curriculum, the second of algebra teachers using traditional methods of teaching algebra in secondary school. The episodes motivated the first group to analyze their own tensions and dilemmas that the newly learned practices introduced. The major attempts of participants of the second group were to “fix” what they perceived to be the reality in ways that coincided with their practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse. The language of teaching and learning. Heinemann Portsmouth, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, D., & Ball, D.(1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19, 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, D., & M. Schnepp (2002). Methods, goals, beliefs, commitments and manner in teaching: Dialogue against a calculus backdrop. Social Constructivist Teaching, 9, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, D., Callis, S., & Lehman, M. (2008). Embracing reason: Egalitarian ideals and the teaching of high school mathematics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elikan, S. (1999). Characterization of computers’ supported inquiry discussions in mathematics classrooms. M.A. Thesis. University of Haifa, Israel. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, P. G. & D. Chazan (2003). Exploring the practical rationality of mathematics teaching through coversations about videotaped episodes: the case of engaging students in proving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(1): 14–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C., & Yerushalmy, M. (2004). Research on the role of technological environments in algebra learning and teaching. In K. Stacey, H. Shick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of Algebra. ICMI Study-12 Volume (pp. 99–152). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. The practitioner inquiry series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 1, 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Rota, S. (2006). A case study on the development of teacher’s proficiency through teaching. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 44–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. (2005). Teachers’ learning in teaching: Developing teachers’ mathematical knowledge through instructional interactions. The paper presented at the 15th ICMI Study: The Professional Education and Development of Teachers of Mathematics. http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/G-math/ICMI/log_in.html

  • Levenberg, I. (1995). Teacher’s diary. Journal for Mathematics Teachers (ALEE') 17, 73–77 (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, J. S. (1990). Classroom discourse analysis: A review of the literature with implications for educational evaluation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989, 2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemirovsky, R. (1996). A functional approach to algebra: Two issues that emerge. In Bednarz, N., Kieran, C., & Lee, L. (eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 295–316). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D. (1996) ‘This is so’: A text on texts. In A. J. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 371–409). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schifter, D. (1996). What’s happening in math class? Envisioning new practices through teacher narratives. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K., & Kendal, M. (2004). Algebra: A world of difference, In: K. Stacey, H. Shick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra. The 12th ICMI Study (pp. 329–346), Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Visual Math: Algebra (1995). Center for educational technology, Ramat-Aviv. http://www.cet.ac.il/math-international/visualizing.htm

  • Wood, T. (1995). An emerging practice of teaching. In P. Cobb & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds), The emergence of mathematical meaning. Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 203–228). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmy, M., & Chazan, D. (2008). Technology and curriculum design: The ordering of discontinuities in school algebra. In L. English et al. (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd edn., pp. 806–837). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmy, M., Elikan, S., & Chazan, D. (2000). Discussions in the Mathematics Classroom. Multimedia package (Video and Documents). University of Haifa and Center for Educational Technology, Ramat-Aviv, IL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Yerushalmy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yerushalmy, M., Elikan, S. (2010). Exploring Reform Ideas for Teaching Algebra: Analysis of Videotaped Episodes and of Conversations About Them. In: Leikin, R., Zazkis, R. (eds) Learning Through Teaching Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3990-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics