Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Delving into Methodology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Authentic Professional Learning

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 2))

  • 1469 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter on methodology begins by reviewing the increasing dissent amongst social researchers about close adherence to research method. I then outline my own position on method in this research, drawing on Mats Alvesson’s argument about the need for “reflexive interpretation” in most empirical research (Alvesson & Sköldberg, 2000; Alvesson, 2002). Following this theoretical and reflexive positioning, issues of quality that influenced the research design and choice of methods are described. The design involves an adapted and extended version of Amedeo Giorgi’s methodology, with some influence from Max van Manen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This research continues to be validated with professionals in different contexts.

  2. 2.

    Some of the detail referred to in this chapter was obtained through participation in a live-in research workshop with Giorgi and is not widely available in print.

References

  • Alvesson, M. (2002). Postmodernism and social research. Philadelphia, PA: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angen, M. J. (2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 378–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P., & Coffey, A. (2004). Analysing documentary realities. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 56–75). London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P.,& Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera's "Immortality": The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 304–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, F. (2005). Community health services in Australia. In J. Germov (Ed.), Second opinion: An introduction to health sociology (pp. 373–396). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). Understanding. Theory, Culture and Society, 13(2), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brace-Govan, J. (2004). Issues in snowball sampling: The lawyer, the model and ethics. Qualitative Research Journal, 4(1), 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne-Armstrong, H., Higgs, J., & Horsfall, D. (Eds.). (2001). Critical moments in qualitative research. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney, M. (2001). Dilemmas of self in the method. Qualitative Health Research, 11(1), 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, C. (2004). Ensuring validity and reliability in phenomenographic research using the analytical framework of a structure of awareness. Qualitative Research Journal, 4(2), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, H. (2001). The fractured lens: Methodology in perspective. In H. Byrne-Armstrong, J. Higgs, & D. Horsfall (Eds.), Critical moments in qualitative research (pp. 17–29). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2000). Research on work, research at work: Postmodern perspectives. In J. Garrick & C. Rhodes (Eds.), Research and knowledge at work: Perspectives, case-studies and innovative strategies (pp. 32–50). London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etherington, K. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher: Using our selves in research. London; Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 645–672).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (1965/1979). Truth and method (2nd ed.). London: Sheed & Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1988). Validity and reliability from a phenomenological perspective. In W. J. Baker, L. P. Mos, H. V. Rappard, & H. J. Stam (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology (pp. 167–176). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1989). An example of harmony between descriptive reports and behaviour. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 20(1), 60–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1990). Phenomenology, psychological science and common sense. In G. R. Semin & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Everyday understanding: Social and scientific implications. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1994). A phenomenological perspective on certain qualitative research methods. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 25(2), 190–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28, 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (2000a). Concerning the application of phenomenology to caring research. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 14, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (2000b). Psychology as a human science revisited. The Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 40(3), 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (2003). Workshop on phenomenology: The philosophy and the method. Quebec: University of Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (2005). The phenomenological movement and research in the human sciences. Nursing Science Quarterly, 18(1), 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in Psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A., & Giorgi, B. (2003a). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 243–273). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A., & Giorgi, B. (2003b). Phenomenology. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 25–50). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grbich, C. (1999). Qualitative research in health: An introduction. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halling, S. (2005). When intimacy and companionship are at the core of the phenomenological research process. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 5(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivarsson, A.-B., Söderback, I., & Ternestedt, A.-M. (2002). The meaning and form of occupational therapy as experienced by women with psychoses. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 16(1), 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, G. (1993). Psychological qualitative research from a phenomenological perspective. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (Eds.). (2000). Moving beyond the gap between research and practice in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman, S. (2004). What is the nature of nurse practitioners’ lived experiences interacting with patients? Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 16(6), 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1994). Ten standard objections to qualitative research interviews. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 25(2), 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, A. (1995). Bird by bird: Some instructions on writing and life. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (2001). Self-reflective inquiry practices. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 433–439). London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320(7226), 50–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, E. (2004). W(h)ither practitioner research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 31(2), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J. L., & Marfo, K. (2001). Preparation of educational researchers in philosophical foundations of inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 525–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydahl-Hansen, S. (2005). Hospitalized patients experienced suffering in life with incurable cancer. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19, 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. (2005). How do we justify knowledge produced within interpretive approaches? Organizational Research Methods, 8(1), 41–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A. (2005). A diagnostic reading of scientifically based research for education. Educational Theory, 55(3), 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot, England: Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1995). Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change 27(6), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, N., Boud, D., Leontios, M., & Staron, M. (2001). Researchers are learners too: Collaboration in research on workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(7/8), 274–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, A. C. (2001). Myth 94: Qualitative health researchers will agree about validity. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 538–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri, H., & Clarke, D. (2009). Advancements in research synthesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 395–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todres, L. (1998). The qualitative description of human experience: The aesthetic dimension. Qualitative Health Research, 8(1), 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Mescht, H. (2004). Phenomenology in education: A case study in educational leadership. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 4(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. (2005). Jostling for position: A sociology of allied health. In J. Germov (Ed.), Second opinion: An introduction to health sociology (pp. 349–372). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (2001). The ‘Things Themselves’ in phenomenology. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 1(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1997a). From meaning to method. Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 345–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1997b). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). London, ON: Althouse Press; University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (2001). Professional practice and ‘Doing Phenomenology’. In S. K. Toombs (Ed.), Handbook of phenomenology and medicine (pp. 457–474). Dordrecht: Kluwer Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (Ed.). (2002). Writing in the dark: Phenomenological studies in interpretive inquiry. London, ON: Althouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Teaching & Educational Development Institute, University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Dr. Ann Webster-Wright

Authors
  1. Dr. Ann Webster-Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Webster-Wright .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Webster-Wright, A. (2010). Delving into Methodology. In: Authentic Professional Learning. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3947-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation