Abstract
To understand what constitutes errors at work and, in particular, how productive learning might arise from those errors, it is necessary to go beyond viewing errors as only objective social facts. That is, only considering errors from the perspective of observable shortfalls in performance, as judged by others. Instead, it is necessary to also account for other and, in particular, personal premises for what constitutes errors at work, and how learning occurs as a consequence of errors and is shaped by cultural, situational and personal factors. In taking these ideas forward, this chapter discusses human performance at work, and proposes that making errors is central to learning, and that a consideration of errors, and how productive learning might arise from them, needs to be premised on socio-personal factors, not just as objective facts: a mistake made, even though that can be the case. Ultimately, both performance at work and learning are held as being socio-personal processes shaped through individuals’ engagement and negotiation with the social world. Therefore, to understand the nature of errors and their associations with learning, it is necessary to consider the contributions and relationships between objective social reality and individuals’ subjective concerns of experience and learning.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist, 48, 35–44.
Bauer, J., & Drechsel, B. (2010). Types of engagement in learning from errors at work – A person-centered view. Paper presented at the 91st AERA annual meeting, Denver.
Bauer, J., & Mulder, R. H. (2007). Modelling learning from errors in daily work. Learning in Health and Social Care, 6, 121–133.
Bernhardt, A. (1999, March). The future of low-wage jobs: Case studies in the retail industry (Institute on Education and the Economy Working Paper 10). Teaching College, Columbia University.
Billett, S. (2001). Knowing in practice: Re-conceptualising vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction, 11, 431–452.
Billett, S. (2003). Sociogeneses, activity and ontogeny. Culture and Psychology, 9, 133–169.
Billett, S. (2009). Workplace competence. In C. R. Velde (Ed.), International perspectives on competence in the workplace: Implications for research, policy and practice (pp. 33–54). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–34.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Darrah, C. N. (1996). Learning and work: An exploration in industrial ethnography. New York: Garland Publishing.
Darrah, C. N. (1997). Complicating the concept of skill requirements: Scenes from a workplace. In G. Hull (Ed.), Changing work, changing workers: Critical perspectives on language, literacy and skills (pp. 249–272). New York: CUNY Press.
Ellstrom, P. E. (1998). The meaning of occupational competence and qualification. In W. J. Nijhof & J. N. Streumer (Eds.), Key qualifications in work and education (pp. 39–50). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683–703). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Filliettaz, L., de Saint-Georges, I., & Duc, B. (2010). Skiing, cheese fondue and Swiss watches: Analogical discourse in vocational training interactions. Vocations and Learning, 3, 117–140.
Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2008). Negative knowledge: Understanding professional learning and expertise. Vocations and Learning: Studies in Professional and Vocational Learning, 1, 87–103.
Gott, S. (1989). Apprenticeship instruction for real-world tasks: The co-ordination of procedures, mental models, and strategies. Review of Research in Education, 15, 97–169.
Hodges, D. C. (1998). Participation as dis-identification with/in a community of practice. Mind, Culture and Activity, 5, 272–290.
Lave, J. (1990). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology (pp. 259–286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, L. M. W., & Scribner, S. (1991). Laboratory for cognitive studies of work: A case study of the intellectual implications of a new technology. Teachers College Record, 92, 582–602.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. London: Penguin.
Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Billett, S. (2012). Errors and Learning from Errors at Work. In: Bauer, J., Harteis, C. (eds) Human Fallibility. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3941-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3941-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3940-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3941-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)