An after-event review (AER) is a learning from experience procedure that gives learners (individuals, teams or larger organizational units) an opportunity to systematically analyze the various actions that they selected to perform or not to perform in carrying out a particular task or responding to a particular event, to determine which of them was wrong or not necessary, which was missing, which needed to be corrected, and which needed to be reinforced. AERs enable individuals and groups to reflect on their performance and to understand why interim objectives were not accomplished, to know what lessons can be drawn from their past experience, and to evaluate how these lessons can be quickly internalized to improve performance. The chapter has four sections. In the first section, I define and describe the concept of AER and its actual and potential applications. The second section is devoted to the influence AERs have on the cognitive processes of learning from experience: intensifying self-explanation, advancing data verification, providing process feedback, and enhancing self-efficacy. In the third section, I discuss the motivational impact of failures or errors on learning from experience, and in the last section, I summarize the theoretical framework and open new directions to research and applications of after-event reviews in organizations.
- Task Performance
- Mental Model
- Organizational Learning
- Knowledge Structure
- Causal Attribution
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.
Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343.
Anderson, C. A., Krull, D. S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Explanations: Processes and consequences. In E. D. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 271–296). New York: Guilford Press.
Anseel, F., Lievens, F., & Schollaert, E. (2009). Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational behavior and human decision making processes, 10, 23–35.
Baird, L., Henderson, J. C., & Watts, S. (1997). Learning from action: An analysis of the center of the army lessons learned (CALL). Human Resource Management, 36, 385–395.
Baird, L., Holland, P., & Deacon, S. (1999). Learning from action: Imbedding more learning into the performance fast enough to make a difference. Organizational Dynamics, 27, 19–32.
Balzer, W. K., Doherty, M. E., & O’Connor, R. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 410–433.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Stanford, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Bies, R. J. (1989). Managing conflict before it happens: The role of accounts. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 83–91). New York: Praeger.
Busby, J. S. (1999). The effectiveness of collective retrospection as a mechanism of organizational learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 109–129.
Carley, K. M. (1997). Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 533–558.
Carroll, J. S. (1995). Incident reviews in high hazard industries: Sense making and learning under ambiguity and accountability. Industrial and Environmental Crisis Quarterly, 9, 175–197.
Carroll, J. S., Rudolph, J. W., & Hatakenaka, S. (2003). Learning from organizational experience. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 575–600). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
Chanowitz, B., & Langer, E. J. (1980). Premature cognitive commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1051–1063.
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
Darling, M. J., & Parry, C. S. (2001). After action reviews: Linking reflection and planning in a learning practice. Reflections, 3, 64–72.
Day, E. A., Arthur, W., & Gettman, D. (2001). Knowledge structures and the acquisition of a complex skill. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1022–1033.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.
Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After event reviews: Drawing lessons from failed and successful events. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 857–871.
Ellis, S., Ganzach, Y., Castle, E., & Sekely, G. (2010). Can filmed AERs of relevant others improve trainees’ performance? The mediating and moderating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 122–131.
Ellis, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1992). Self as epistemic authority: Effects on experiential and instructional learning. Social Cognition, 10, 155–177.
Ellis, S., Mendel, R., & Aloni-Zohar, M. (2009). The effects of accuracy of performance evaluation on learning from experience: The moderating role of after-event reviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(3), 541–563.
Ellis, S., Mendel, R., & Nir, M. (2006). Learning from successful vs. failed events: The moderating role of kind of after-event-review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 669–680.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (1988). The knowledge elicitation problem: A psychological perspective. Behavior and Information Technology, 7, 111–130.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.
Feldman, J. (1989). On the difficulty of learning from experience. In H. P. Sims & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organization (pp. 263–292). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fischhoff, B. (1982). For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight. In D. Kahanman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnett, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 271–340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Freund, T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Schpitzajzen, A. (1985). The freezing and unfreezing of impressional primacy: Effects of need for structure and fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 479–489.
Gray, D. E. (2007). Facilitating management learning: Developing critical reflection through reflection tools. Management Learning, 38, 495–517.
Gronhaug, K., & Falkenberg, J. S. (1998). Success attributions within and across organizations. In C. Eden & J. C. Spender (Eds.), Managerial and organizational cognition: Theory, methods, and research (pp. 93–107). London: Sage.
Gulliver, F. R. (1987). Post-project appraisals pay. Harvard Business Review, 67(2), 128–132.
Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44–56.
Hilton, D. J., Mathes, R. H., & Trabasso, T. (1992). The study of causal explanation in natural language: Analyzing reports of the challenger disaster in the New York Times. In M. L. McLaughin, M. J. Cody, & S. J. Read (Eds.), Explaining one’s self to others (pp. 41–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hogarth, R. M., Gibbs, B. J., McKenzie, C. R. M., & Marquis, M. A. (1991). Learning from feedback: Exactingness and incentives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 734–752.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1–26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Guilford Press.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493–520). New York: Guilford Press.
Louis, M. R., & Sutton, R. I. (1991). Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations, 44, 55–76.
McGill, A. L. (1989). Context effects in judgments of causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 189–200.
Mikulincer, M., & Nizan, B. (1988). Causal attribution, cognitive interference, and the generalization of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 470–478.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Nathan, M. J., Mertz, K., & Ryan, B. (1994, April). Learning through self-explanations of mathematical examples: Effects of cognitive load. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Postman, L., & Brown, D. R. (1952). The perceptual consequences of success and failure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 213–221.
Ron, N., Lipshitz, R., & Popper, M. (2006). Post-flight reviews in an F-16 fighter squadron: An application of a multi-facet model of organisational learning. Unpublished manuscript, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children’s behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57, 149–174.
Senders, J. W., & Moray, N. P. (1991). Human error: Cause, prediction, and reduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231–266.
Strange, J. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). The origins of vision: Effects of reflection models, and analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 121–148.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, A. (1996). Social hypothesis testing: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493–520). New York: Guilford.
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). New York: Academic.
Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Education Research, 13, 21–39.
Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39, 40–49.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.
Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 1–14.
Wong, P. T. P., & Weiner, B. (1981). When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650–663.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ellis, S. (2012). Learning from Errors: The Role of After-Event Reviews. In: Bauer, J., Harteis, C. (eds) Human Fallibility. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3941-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3940-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3941-5