Abstract
Coaching, and especially executive coaching , is one of the fastest growing industries in recent years and is being used more and more often for the development of workers. This chapter seeks to explain the effectiveness of the relationship between the coach and the coachee in collegial coaching. For this purpose 35 coachees and their coaches were interviewed. The coachees were all managers working for the Dutch government. Their coaches were also managers who were trained to coach their colleague managers from other departments within the government. The findings show that coachees attributed the effectiveness of their coaching to a large part to the relationship they had with their coach. Receiving unconditional acceptance and respect from the coach was not only a facilitative condition, but also directly responsible for change. Furthermore, the findings indicate that although there should be a certain distance between the coach and the coachee, a purely formal unilateral helping relationship is less effective than a mutual relationship in which a deeper personal connection exists between the coach and the coachee. Also, the findings suggest that while differences between the coach and coachee in terms of personality may lead to useful challenge, when it comes to beliefs and values more similarity between coach and coachee is desired.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arizmendi, T. G., Beutler, L. E., Shanfield, S. B., Crago, M., & Hagaman, R. (1985). Client–therapist value similarity and psychotherapy outcome: A microscopic analysis. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 22, 16-21.
Arthur, C. L., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49-52.
Barrett, M. S., & Berman, J. S. (2001). Is psychotherapy more effective when therapists disclose information about themselves? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 597-603.
Bordin, E. S. (1994). Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 13-37). New York: Wiley.
Campbell Quick, J., & Macik-Frey, M. (2004). Behind the mask: Coaching through deep interpersonal communication. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 56, 67-74.
Dijkstra, T. (2007). Coachen als tweede beroep [Coaching as a second profession]. Zaltbommel: Schouten en Nelissen.
Dryer, D. C., & Horowitz, L. M. (1997). When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 592-603.
Feldman, D. C., & Lankau, M. J. (2005). Executive coaching: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 31, 829-848.
Goldsmith, M., Lyons, L., & Freas, A. (2000). Coaching for leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
Hart, V., Blattner, J., & Leipsic, S. (2001). Coaching versus therapy: A perspective. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53, 229-235.
Hersoug, A. G., Høglend, P., Monsen, J. T., & Havik, O. E. (2001). Quality of working alliance in psychotherapy. Therapist variables and patient/therapist similarity as predictors. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 10, 205-216.
Horvath, A. O. (2000). The therapeutic relationship: From transference to alliance. Journal of Clinical Psychology/In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, 56(2), 163-173.
Jarvis, J. (2004). Coaching and buying coaching services. A guide. London: CIPD.
Kelly, T. A., & Strupp, H. H. (1992). Patient and therapist values in psychotherapy: Perceived changes, assimilation, similarity, and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 34-40.
Kilburg, R. R. (1996). Toward a conceptual understanding and definition of executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48, 134-144.
O’Broin, A., & Palmer, S. (2006). The coach-client relationship and contributions made by the coach in improving coaching outcome. The Coaching Psychologist, 2(2), 16-19.
Parker, P., Hall, D. T., & Kram, K. E. (2008). Peer coaching: A relational process for accelerating career learning. Academy of Management Learning, 7, 487-503.
Plunkett, B. L., & Egan, T. M. (2004, February). Application of psychology-based theoretical approaches to executive coaching. A summary and exploration of potential utility. Paper presented at The Academy of Human Resource Development, Bowling Green, OH.
Scoular, A., & Linley, P. A. (2006). Coaching, goalsetting and personality type: What matters? The Coaching Psychologist, 2(1), 9-11.
Sperry, L. (1993). Working with executives: Consulting, counseling, and coaching. Individual Psychology, 49, 257-266.
Stern, L. R. (2004). Executive coaching : A working definition. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 56, 154-162.
Truijen, K. J. P., & Van Woerkom, M. (2008). The pitfalls of collegial coaching. An analysis of collegial coaching in medical education and its influence on stimulating reflection and performance of novice clinical teachers. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(5), 316-326.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Woerkom, M. (2010). The Relationship between Coach and Coachee: A Crucial Factor for Coaching Effectiveness. In: Billett, S. (eds) Learning Through Practice. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3939-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3939-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3938-5
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3939-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)