Skip to main content

Curriculum-Aligned Professional Development for Geospatial Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology

Abstract

Professional development (PD) designed to accompany curriculum materials prepares teachers for specific classroom practices, guides them during practice, and creates opportunities for reflection. We present the theoretical underpinnings for our model of curriculum-linked PD and describe a hybrid (face-to-face and online) professional development program for curriculum materials that make use of the My World™ Geographic Information System software. Research-derived design principles for curriculum-aligned PD include the following: (1) identify goals for the professional development, (2) adopt a learning theory and use it, and (3) evaluate whether learning goals were met and then revise PD practices according to this feedback. We do not intend our design to be the model for online PD, but rather an example of an approach successfully applying our design principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Audet, R., & Paris, J. (1997). GIS implementation model for schools: Assessing the critical concerns. Journal of Geography, 96(6), 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, T., & Kahan, J. (1996). Michigan curriculum framework: Science education guidebook (PDF Document). Lansing, MI: State of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. (2006). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 391–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C., Schwille, K., Bruozas, M., Lach, M., Taber, M., Gordin, D. N., et al. (2005). Investigations in environmental science: A case-based approach to the study of environmental systems. Armonk, NY: It’s About Time.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kali, Y., Linn, M. C., & Roseman, J. E. (Eds.). (2008). Designing coherent science education: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, A. M. (2004). Improving teacher quality through professional development. Education, 124(3), 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerski, J. J. (2001). A national assessment of GIS in American High Schools. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 10(1), 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerski, J. J. (2003). The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information system technology and methods in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 102, 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 483–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubitskey, B. (2006). Extended professional development for systemic curriculum reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitskey, B., & Fishman, B. (2005, April). Untangling the relationship(s) between professional development, practice, student learning and teacher learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitskey, B., & Fishman, B. (2006, April). Professional development design for systemic curriculum change. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitskey, B., Fishman, B., & Marx, R. (2003, April). The relationship between professional development and student learning: Exploring the link through design research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitskey, B., Fishman, B., & Marx, R. (2004). Impact of professional development on a teacher and her students: A case study. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-T. (2008). Exploring the role of showing design intent in supporting curriculum modifications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R. W. (2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student teacher/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClurg, P., & Buss, A. (2007). Professional development: Teachers use of GIS to enhance student learning. Journal of Geography, 106(2), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K–12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Staff Development Council. (2001). NSDC standards for staff development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (2000). Alexis De Toqueville and the dilemmas of professional development. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED479531). Retrieved from ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (2003). The dilemmas of professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(5), 401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivet, A. E. (2004). Contextualizing instruction: Connecting to urban students’ ideas and experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2000). Creating a “connected” community? Teachers’ use of an electronic discussion group. Teachers College Record, 102(4), 750–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J., Marx, R. W., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(2), 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supovitz, J. A., Mahyer, D. P., & Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14(3), 331–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins Jr., T. D. (2003). Approval of the update of professional development vision and standards for Michigan educators (PDF Document). Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Education. Retrieved March 21, 2004, from http://www.michigan.gov/documents/ProfDevStdsVISWStrategies_4_9_03_C61067__A62638_12_09_02_62686_7.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

 The work described in this chapter was funded by the National Science Foundation under grants ESI-0455582, REC-9876150, ESI-0227557, and 0352478, and by the National Geographic Education Foundation. The opinions reported in this work are those of the authors and not the funding agencies or their institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth Kubitskey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kubitskey, B., Fishman, B., Johnson, H., Mawyer, K., Edelson, D. (2014). Curriculum-Aligned Professional Development for Geospatial Education. In: MaKinster, J., Trautmann, N., Barnett, M. (eds) Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3931-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics