Skip to main content

Blurring the Boundary Between the Classroom and the Community: Challenges for Teachers’ Professional Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Today arguments mount for a science education that students find engaging. Thus attention has turned towards curriculum that places more focus on the world outside school, on the reasonable view that if students are to operate as informed citizens then the science curriculum they experience at school has to be sufficiently meaningful and relevant for them to perceive links with what they experience outside the school doors. However, the science that is enacted beyond the classroom is not immediately discernible in the issues and problems in which it resides, because it is melded immutably with knowledge and understanding in a range of other subjects—mathematics, geography and economics—and also is imbued with social, cultural and political values. Teaching science that includes interaction with significant issues beyond the classroom demands of teachers a different knowledge base than the discipline-specific perspective. Instead, teachers need to work in interdisciplinary ways and integrate at least some parts of the curriculum. Significantly, curriculum integration is a contested concept in science education, reflecting the tension that exists between the powerful knowledge attributed to disciplines and the arguably more worthwhile, but less powerful, interdisciplinary knowledge available from an integrated curriculum. Thus for quality teaching that deals with issues beyond the classroom, a different interpretation of pedagogical content knowledge is required. In this chapter, the curriculum forces that underlie this tension are explored and an argument made for a more balanced view of science curriculum which can serve both the need for disciplinary knowledge and the need for students to be able to apply their learning outside of school.

“Teachers, students, parents and Dr C. We hope you enjoy our performance. We would like to tell you why we wrote the Potato Rap. We were given this challenge by Dr C. to see if we could inform you that this is the International Year of the Potato. Why would anybody want to make an International Year of the Potato, after all, it’s just a potato, right? But once we started to research potatoes, we found out some interesting facts…”

Soon the spokesperson for the Year 4 class introduced Dr C., the school’s visiting scientist (a potato pathologist), to the school assembly, who explained,

“I work with a lot of sick potatoes, and just like a doctor, we have to find out which potatoes are sick, why they are sick, and see if we can find a cure. The work that we do as scientists helps you to have a constant supply of potatoes.”

He thanked the class for their performance and some rap music began to throb.

“Hey!”

shouted 25 potatoes in unison—the entire class was on the stage, dressed in coloured tights stuffed with crumpled paper—brown potatoes, yellow potatoes, purple potatoes, white potatoes, pink potatoes.

“What do you know?

All the world eats”

and 25 potatoes threw their arms in the air, shouting

“Potatoes!”

The rap music continued:

“How do you know if a potato is sick?”

(A large brown potato at the front of the group collapsed dramatically, but gracefully, to the stage.)

“Find a ‘tato pathologist really quick!”

(A white potato comes to the rescue.)

“They are like a doctor, calling around”

(The brown potato is rapidly cured.)

“They’ll keep potatoes healthy and brown!

Potatoes!”

Caught up in the class’s enthusiasm, the audience of delighted parents and other students at the assembly raised their hands and joined the shout before the next verse of the Potato Rap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Scientists in Schools project is an initiative of the Australian Government’s Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations, and is managed by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.

  2. 2.

    The focus here is on Western countries (from where national reports are more readily obtained), but projects like the Relevance of Science Education (ROSE) indicate that in terms of interest in, and commitment to, science, the Western countries are those where the situation is most dire (Schreiner and Sjøberg 2007). In developing countries, a science career is much more likely to be a passport to well-paid employment and so the value of science education remains high.

  3. 3.

    Further information is available in recent reviews of research in out-of-school learning (Bell et al. 2009; Rennie 2007; Stocklmayer et al. 2010) and guidance for teachers in using a range of community resources (Braund and Reiss 2004).

References

  • Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Science Teachers Association. (2005). SCIps school industry partnerships in science: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training. (Available at http://www.asta.edu.au/scips/gui/files/final_report.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students “ideas-about-science”: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88, 655–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1971). On classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (Eds.). (2004). Learning science outside the classroom. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, D., Dillon, J., & Gunstone, R. (Eds.). (2007). The re-emergence of values in science education. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. In G. J. Kelly, A. Luke, & J. Green (Eds.), What counts as knowledge in educational settings, disciplinary knowledge, assessment, and curriculum. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17, 415–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J. (2008). Science education policy-making: Eleven emerging issues. A report commissioned by UNESCO, Section for Science, Technical and Vocational Education. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001567/156700e.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J. (2009). The link between policy and practice in science education: The role of research. Science Education, 93, 1076–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. L. (Ed.). (1975). Science and the structure of knowledge. In P. L. Gardner (Ed.), The structure of science education (pp. 1–40). Hawthorn: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools: A research report. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. (2007). School science: A questionable construct? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(3), 265–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. Nafferton: Studies in Education Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R., & Turner, S. (2001). Valuable lessons: Engaging with the social context of science in schools. London: The Wellcome Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Duschl, R., & Fairbrother, R. (2002). Breaking the mould? Teaching science for public understanding (a report commissioned by the Nuffield Foundation). London: The Nuffield Foundation. (Available at www.kcl.ac.uk).

  • Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J. (2006, August). The community’s contribution to science learning: Making it count. Plenary address to the ACER Research Conference 2006, “Boosting science learning—What will it take,” Canberra. http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/RC2006_Rennie.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2007.

  • Rennie, L. J. (2007). Learning science outside of school. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 125–167). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Howitt, C. (2009). “Science has changed my life!” Evaluation of the scientists in schools project. A report of its evaluation. http://www.scientistsinschools.edu.au/evaluation.htm. Accessed 15 April 2009.

  • Rennie, L. J., & The Australian Science Teachers Association. (2003). The ASTA science awareness raising model: An evaluation report prepared for the Department of Education Science and Training. Canberra: ASTA. (Available at http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/profiles/science_awareness_raising_model_evaluation.htm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2010). Learning science in an integrated classroom: Finding balance through theoretical triangulation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1–24. First published on: 02 December 2010 (iFirst).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, K. (2010). Engaging with bioethics: A professional learning programme for science teachers. In A. Jones, A. McKim, & M. Reiss, (Eds.), Ethics in the science and technology classroom: A new approach to teaching and learning (pp. 103–128). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction—two incompatible projects. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 231–247). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Symington, D., Smith, C., & Rodrigues, S. (2008). An innovation framework based on best practice exemplars from the Australian School Innovation in Science, Technology and Mathematics (ASISTM) Project. Canberra, Australia. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/profiles/innovative_framework_asistm.htm. Accessed 1 June 2009.

  • Venville, G., Rennie, L., & Wallace, J. (2004). Decision making and sources of knowledge: How students tackle integrated tasks in science, technology and mathematics. Research in Science Education, 31(2), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venville, G., Rennie, L. J., & Wallace, J. (in press). Curriculum integration: Challenging the assumption of school science as powerful knowledge. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venville, G., Sheffield, R., Rennie, L., & Wallace, J. (2008). The writing on the classroom wall: The effect of school context on learning in integrated, community-based science projects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 857–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L. J., & Malone, J. (2002). Curriculum integration: Eroding the high ground of science as a school subject. Studies in Science Education, 37, 43–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rennie, L.J. (2011). Blurring the Boundary Between the Classroom and the Community: Challenges for Teachers’ Professional Knowledge. In: Corrigan, D., Dillon, J., Gunstone, R. (eds) The Professional Knowledge Base of Science Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics