Skip to main content

Subject Benchmarking in the UK

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 30))

Abstract

Subject benchmarking was part of an agglomeration of quality assurance measures that emerged in United Kingdom higher education during the 1990s in large part as a reaction to the precipitous transition from “elite” to “mass” higher education in the early years of the decade. Rapid growth of student numbers was accompanied by expansion in the number of subjects and areas of study offered as degree programmes. This aroused political attention, and national government, as the main provider of funds, required the higher education sector to take steps to ensure that all its degree programmes were fit for the purpose. Over 50 subject-benchmarking committees issued reports between 1998 and 2001 setting out in some detail what degree programmes in the specialist subjects might be expected to cover. However, despite the initial intentions the benchmark reports were never used for hard regulatory purposes and instead have become developmental tools, particularly in new subject areas trying to attain academic respectability. The whole exercise has demonstrated the enduring collegiality of the academic community in British higher education and the continuing belief that in some real sense degrees from all higher education institutions possess something meaningful in common.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     This process came to fruition in 2004/2005 when most of the remaining higher education institutions were transformed into teaching universities.

  2. 2.

     Art and design, biology, business and management, English, and music and drama.

  3. 3.

     Accountancy, art and design, biological sciences, classics, communication and media studies, economics, English, European studies, French, geography, history, hospitality management, law, and philosophy.

  4. 4.

     In view of its central role in the development and use of subject benchmarks it is important to realise that the QAA is an independent body funded by subscriptions from UK higher education institutions, and through contracts with the main UK higher education funding bodies. It is owned by the higher education institutions through Universities UK (UUK) and the Standing College of Principals (SCOP), membership organisations whose members are heads of all the higher education institutions in the UK. However, legally and contractually it does have obligations to perform certain tasks on behalf of the government owned Higher Education Funding Councils.

  5. 5.

     An honours degree in UK higher education is essentially a basic first degree. There are many local variations and in a few cases ‘pass’ degrees are still awarded. Most degrees are classified into first class, upper second class, lower second class, and third class. (This is currently under discussion and there are moves to substitute a Grade point average system). More than half of today’s graduates obtain an upper second class degree so the modal threshold is somewhere in this range.

  6. 6.

     About 25 per cent of first-degree graduates continue with further academic or professional study immediately after graduating.

  7. 7.

     However, in the Autumn of 2005, under pressure from the government a consultative document was circulated by UUK and SCOP (the bodies representing the heads of higher education institutions) making proposals for the classification of degrees and attempting to ensure that common principles are applied across the whole of higher education for the benefit of students choosing universities and employers recruiting graduates.

References

  • Becher, T., Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekhradnia, B. (2003). 20 years of higher education policy: Looking back 10 years and forward to the next decade. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkbeck (2006). Academic quality assurance. Birkbeck College, University of London. http://www.bbk.ac.uk/qa/external/subjbench Accessed 12 June 2009.

  • Brown, R. (2004). Quality assurance in higher education: The UK experience sine 1992. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge (2007). A Guide to quality assurance University of Cambridge academic division. http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/offices/education/quality/221.html Accessed 12 June 2009.

  • Chandler, J. (2001). Benchmarking the Sociology Discipline. In E. Harrison, & R. Mears (eds.), Assessing sociologists in higher education (pp. 41–60). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemistry benchmarking report – see QAA website below.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing (1997). Higher education in the learning society. Report of the National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economics benchmarking report – see QAA website below.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Medical Council (2002). Tomorrow’s Doctors. London: GMC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEQC (1995). Graduateness: What are graduates? Clarifying the attributes of ‘graduateness’. Higher Education Quality Council Quality Enhancement Group. London. http://www.city. londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/graduates/starter.html Accessed 12 June 2009.

  • History benchmarking report – see QAA website below.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. (1998). Pilot Benchmarking Study of Assessment Practice in Seven Engineering Departments. In N. Jackson (ed.), Pilot studies in benchmarking assessment practice. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler, B., Forbes, P. (2005). Student employability profiles: A guide for employers. London: CIHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law benchmarking report – see QAA website below.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverpool (2006). Programme specification: Notes for guidance. University of Liverpool. http://www.liv.ac.uk/tqsd/qualityframework/ps_gn_06.doc Accessed 12 June 2009.

  • QAA (website) Quality Assurance Agency Website. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/ academicinfrastructure/benchmark/honours/ Accessed 12 June 2009.

  • QAA (1998). Evaluation of the benchmarking process in Law, Chemistry and History. Cheltenham UK: Quality Assurance Agency. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/ benchmark/evaluation/overview.asp Accessed 12 June 2009.

  • Rae, J. (1895). Life of Adam Smith. Reprinted in 1965 by New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2004). The higher education market in the United Kingdom. In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, A. Amaral (eds.), Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisby, E. (2002). Subject Benchmarking as a ‘new mode’ of regulating teaching in higher education and its implications for academic autonomy – including a case study of the Sociology Benchmarking Group. PhD dissertation, Sheffield University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (2001). Assessment issues arising from Subject Benchmarking statements. Bristol: Learning and Teaching Support Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (1961). The rise of the meritocracy. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, G. (2010). Subject Benchmarking in the UK. In: Dill, D., Beerkens, M. (eds) Public Policy for Academic Quality. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3754-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics