Skip to main content

How the Ecological Footprint Is Sex-Gendered

Implications of Eco-feminism for an Eco-socialist Theory and Praxis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Eco-socialism as Politics

Abstract

The chapter argues that unless eco-socialism is sex-gender literate, it cannot even begin to function as a democratic politics. The essay amplifies eco-feminism using the ecological footprint indicator, and addresses sex-gender differences in energy consumption patterns, preferred solutions to climate change, and policy decision-making styles at international forums like the IPCC. Eco-feminists attend to the logic of women’s reproductive labour, and how it engages a different set of values from those in the productive economic sector. An eco-socialist politics must find a way to accommodate this ‘difference’, if it is to be a globally just and deep green theory and movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is not to suggest that advocates of the footprint indicator themselves are concerned with gender difference. I wrote to Rethinking Progress about this in 2004 and the reply was - good idea, but not on our research agenda.

  2. 2.

    I am thinking here of how governments locate waste disposal sites in poor ethnic neighbourhoods or on indigenous land; or how excessive water use by factories is state subsidised while householders are taxed for it.

References

  • Bennholdt-Thomsen, V., & Mies, M. (1999). The subsistence perspective. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2006). Women and transport in Europe. Retrieved November 7, 2007, from www.europarl.europa.eu/EST/download.do?file=9558

  • Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the witch. New York: Autonomedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gender CC (2010). Women for Climate Justice. Retrieved January 7, 2010, from www.gendercc.net.

  • Isla, A. (2009). Who pays for Kyoto Protocol? In A. Salleh (Ed.), Eco-sufficiency and global justice. London/New York: Pluto Press, (pp. 199-217).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson-Latham, G. (2006). Initial study of lifestyles, consumption patterns, sustainable development and gender. Stockholm: Swedish Ministry of Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, M. (1992). Breaking the boundaries. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehr, Ulrike (2007). GENANET - Focal point on gender justice and sustainability. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from www.genanet.de

  • Salleh, A. (1997). Ecofeminism as politics. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A. (2004). Global alternatives and the meta-industrial class. In R. Albritton, S. Bell, J. R. Bell & R. Westra (Eds.), New socialisms: Futures beyond globalization New York: Routledge, (pp. 201-211).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A. (Ed.), 2006. Symposium: Ecosocialist-ecofeminist dialogues. Capitalism Nature Socialism 17: 32-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A. (Ed.), (2009). Eco-sufficiency and global justice. London/New York: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. (2007). Global issues. Retrieved November 25, 2007, from www.globalissues.org/HumanRights/WomensRights.

  • Shiva, V. (1989). Staying alive. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T., & Brownhill, L. (2004). We want our land back. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 15, 21-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1994). UN framework convention on climate change Article 3. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf

  • UN. (1995). The official report of the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. Retrieved September 1, 2007, from www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/index.html

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women’s Environment Network and National Federation of Women’s Institutes, (2007). Women’s Manifesto on Climate Change. Retrieved May 10, 2008, from www.wen.org.uk

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariel Salleh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salleh, A. (2010). How the Ecological Footprint Is Sex-Gendered. In: Huan, Q. (eds) Eco-socialism as Politics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3745-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics