Abstract
The chapter argues that unless eco-socialism is sex-gender literate, it cannot even begin to function as a democratic politics. The essay amplifies eco-feminism using the ecological footprint indicator, and addresses sex-gender differences in energy consumption patterns, preferred solutions to climate change, and policy decision-making styles at international forums like the IPCC. Eco-feminists attend to the logic of women’s reproductive labour, and how it engages a different set of values from those in the productive economic sector. An eco-socialist politics must find a way to accommodate this ‘difference’, if it is to be a globally just and deep green theory and movement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is not to suggest that advocates of the footprint indicator themselves are concerned with gender difference. I wrote to Rethinking Progress about this in 2004 and the reply was - good idea, but not on our research agenda.
- 2.
I am thinking here of how governments locate waste disposal sites in poor ethnic neighbourhoods or on indigenous land; or how excessive water use by factories is state subsidised while householders are taxed for it.
References
Bennholdt-Thomsen, V., & Mies, M. (1999). The subsistence perspective. London: Zed Books.
European Parliament. (2006). Women and transport in Europe. Retrieved November 7, 2007, from www.europarl.europa.eu/EST/download.do?file=9558
Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the witch. New York: Autonomedia.
Gender CC (2010). Women for Climate Justice. Retrieved January 7, 2010, from www.gendercc.net.
Isla, A. (2009). Who pays for Kyoto Protocol? In A. Salleh (Ed.), Eco-sufficiency and global justice. London/New York: Pluto Press, (pp. 199-217).
Johnsson-Latham, G. (2006). Initial study of lifestyles, consumption patterns, sustainable development and gender. Stockholm: Swedish Ministry of Sustainable Development.
Mellor, M. (1992). Breaking the boundaries. London: Virago.
Roehr, Ulrike (2007). GENANET - Focal point on gender justice and sustainability. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from www.genanet.de
Salleh, A. (1997). Ecofeminism as politics. London: Zed Books.
Salleh, A. (2004). Global alternatives and the meta-industrial class. In R. Albritton, S. Bell, J. R. Bell & R. Westra (Eds.), New socialisms: Futures beyond globalization New York: Routledge, (pp. 201-211).
Salleh, A. (Ed.), 2006. Symposium: Ecosocialist-ecofeminist dialogues. Capitalism Nature Socialism 17: 32-124.
Salleh, A. (Ed.), (2009). Eco-sufficiency and global justice. London/New York: Pluto Press.
Shah, A. (2007). Global issues. Retrieved November 25, 2007, from www.globalissues.org/HumanRights/WomensRights.
Shiva, V. (1989). Staying alive. London: Zed Books.
Turner, T., & Brownhill, L. (2004). We want our land back. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 15, 21-40.
UN. (1994). UN framework convention on climate change Article 3. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
UN. (1995). The official report of the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. Retrieved September 1, 2007, from www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/index.html
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society.
Women’s Environment Network and National Federation of Women’s Institutes, (2007). Women’s Manifesto on Climate Change. Retrieved May 10, 2008, from www.wen.org.uk
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Salleh, A. (2010). How the Ecological Footprint Is Sex-Gendered. In: Huan, Q. (eds) Eco-socialism as Politics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3745-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3745-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3744-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3745-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)