Skip to main content

Evaluating Japanese Agricultural Policy from an Eco-socialist Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1762 Accesses

Abstract

When discussing the sustainability of agriculture, we cannot help but turn to the specific characteristics of farming labour. It is from such an eco-socialist perspective, of course in a very broad sense, that we can easily understand the incompatibility of environmental protection of rural areas and an internationalising market of agricultural products. Furthermore, as the analysis of the Japanese case has shown, to integrate agricultural production policy with environmental protection policy, we have no alternative but construct a decentralised market where local people can physically confirm the credibility of environmental safety for themselves. In this sense, the agricultural environmental policy reform pursued in Western industrial countries, including in Japan, can clearly not meet these requirements, if not moving along a wrong direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Like every concept of social thought, eco-socialism is in itself contentious. In this chapter, I will evade this difficult question of definition but focus upon the theories of Ted Benton and the eco-feminists, who propose for rethinking the importance of agriculture from a broad eco-socialist standpoint.

  2. 2.

    One of the well-known caring theorists, Milton Mayeroff, defines care in this way: ‘To care for another person, in the most significant sense, is to help him grow and actualise himself’ (Mayeroff 1971: 1). He asserts that there is a universal pattern of caring which covers non-human life or even an idea. However, as his definition above shows, the interpersonal relation is at the center of his model. In a care activity, communication between the caring person and the cared is particularly important. Therefore, we must be cautious to apply this general idea directly to agricultural labour. Farmers inquire after soil or listen to crops though there is no answer except the one that the questioner imagines. May we not say this posture is almost caring?

References

  • Benton, T. (1996). Marxism and natural limits: An ecological critique and reconstruction. In T. Benton (Ed.), The greening of Marxism (pp. 157-183). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egaitsu, F. (2003). Agricultural economics. Tokyo: Iwanami.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission, E. (2005). Agri-environment measures: Overview on general principles, types of measures, and application. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, K. (1988). The agrarian question (Vol. I). London: Zwan Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayeroff, M. (1971). On caring. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M. (1988). Introduction. In M. Mies, et al. (Eds.), Women: The last colony (pp.1-10). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M. (1988). Capitalist development and subsistence production: Rural women in India. In M. Mies, et al. (Eds.), Women: The last colony (pp. 27-50). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M. (1998). Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labour. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1993). Agricultural and environmental policy integration: Recent progress and new directions. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). OECD report: Multifunctionality of agriculture. Tokyo: Nosongyosonkyokai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakuyama, T. (2006). International negotiations over the multifunctionality of agriculture. Tokyo: Tsukubashobo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirai, A. (2002). Agriculture, farmer and socialism. Quest, No. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Werlhof, C. (1988). On the concept of nature and society in capitalism. In M. Mies, et al. (Eds.), Women: The last colony (pp. 96-112). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaguchi, Y. (1999). Development of world agricultural politics and decoupling. In Japan Agriculture Research Center (Ed.), Studies of Japanese style of decoupling. Tokyo: Nourintoukeikyokai.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masatsugu Maruyama .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maruyama, M. (2010). Evaluating Japanese Agricultural Policy from an Eco-socialist Perspective. In: Huan, Q. (eds) Eco-socialism as Politics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3745-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics