Skip to main content

Abstract

In the previous chapters we have introduced techniques to find relations between two or more different fields. In this chapter we describe a more general framework that may provide additional insight into previously analyzed methods. In general a relation between fields can be formulated symbolically as

$$\begin{array}{rcl} \mathbf{Z} = f(\mathbf{S})& &\end{array}$$
(8.1)

where, for instance, Z represents the geopotential and S the SST. The exact form of the relation is unknown, but it is probably time dependent and thus includes effects of time lags and so on. In practice, it is really difficult to investigate arbitrary functional forms for f in (8.1); assuming f to be linear represents a simplifying but viable alternative. In this case the function f may be represented by matrices. We have seen in the previous chapters that powerful methods have been devised to identify relations of the form (8.1) assuming that f(S) is a linear function. We have seen linear correlation methods, teleconnection analysis and finally methods that analyze systematically the linear relation between two data sets, such as the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) or Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA). We will now define a general framework that includes the latter as special case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The name is taken from the Greek mythology. Procrustes, the owner of a tavern, had only one bed and therefore took to sawing off the legs of his guests if they were too long for his bed. In a similar way, we are trying to “constrain” the matrix Z into S and we are willing to chop off some part of Z in order to so.

References

  • Navarra A, Tribbia J (2005) The coupled manifold. J Atmos Sci 62:310–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub H Gene, Charles F Van Loan (1996) Matrix computations, 3rd edn. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman MB, Vermette SJ (1993) The use of procrustes target analysis to discriminate dominant source regions of fine sulfur in the western USA. Atm Environ 27A:475–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton CS, Smith C, Wallace JM (1992) An intercomparison of methods for finding coupled patterns in climate data. J Climate 5:541–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry S (1996) Singular value decomposition and canonical correlation. J Climate 9: 2003–2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Navarra .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Navarra, A., Simoncini, V. (2010). Multiple Linear Regression Methods. In: A Guide to Empirical Orthogonal Functions for Climate Data Analysis. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3702-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics