Skip to main content

Victories for Empiricism, Failures for Theory: Medicine and Science in the Seventeenth Century

  • Chapter
The Body as Object and Instrument of Knowledge

Part of the book series: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ((AUST,volume 25))

Abstract

For millennia, learned physicians tried to develop theoretical principles that would guide their therapeutic actions. The most enduring foundations were built on the discourse of the four elements, four qualities, four humours, six non-naturals, and the ways these combined to yield individual temperaments and constitutions. As these fundamentals came under attack in the seventeenth century, empiricism and medical specifics once again seemed the best method of finding certainty in therapy. This was no simple change in “method” proposed by the learned, however, since the developing medical marketplace gave empirics many new opportunities for promoting their views and forcing the rest to take account of them. Does this transition in medicine also apply to “science” more generally, giving prominence to those “matters of fact” that have gained our attention in recent years? The case is made for answering “yes.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cook 1986, 1987, 1989a, 1990b; Lloyd 1979.

  2. 2.

    Latour and Woolgar 1986, first publ. 1979; Figlio 1978; Lloyd 1979; MacDonald 1981; Shapin and Schaffer 1986.

  3. 3.

    Levine 1983; Shapiro 1983; Eamon 1983; Daston 1988; Dear 1990; Cook 1991, 1993; Findlen 1994.

  4. 4.

    I am of course aware of the argument about why the word “science” is anachronistic when applied to the early modern period, but for reasons that will become clear below I do not think that “natural philosophy” is a good enough substitute for a collection of activities that also included medicine, chemistry, and artisanal practices; the term science therefore remains a useful short-hand. On learning and worldly engagements, see for example Eamon 1994; Smith 1994, 2004; Long 2001; Cook 2007; Harkness 2007. For the counter-argument, see Cunningham 1991; Cunningham and Williams 1993.

  5. 5.

    For the problematic status of medicine in the medieval university, however, see Getz 1992, 1997.

  6. 6.

    For related arguments, Hadden 1994; Kaye 1998.

  7. 7.

    The argument for a distinction between experimental and mathematical sciences is captured best in Kuhn 1976.

  8. 8.

    Hall 1983, 147.

  9. 9.

    Hall 1954, quotations from 134, 275, 289.

  10. 10.

    Gillispie 1960, 57. For his own debt to, and comment on, Koyre’s program, see 523–524. For further historiographical discussion, see the introductions to Cook 1993, 1990b.

  11. 11.

    Hall 1974; Hunter 1976, 1982; and for examples: Pagel 1958; Debus 1966; Hannaway 1975; Webster 1976; Bylebyl 1979; Frank 1980.

  12. 12.

    Eamon 1994; Kassell 2005; Webster 2008. For a fresh look at the historiography of medical relationships, see Jenner and Wallis 2007.

  13. 13.

    Cook 1994.

  14. 14.

    Eamon 1993; Webster 2008; Jones 1960.

  15. 15.

    Carlino 1999.

  16. 16.

    Egmond 2008; Findlen 1998; Cook 2007.

  17. 17.

    Jean Fernel, Methodo medendi, quoted in Reeds 1991, 25–26.

  18. 18.

    Hanson 2009; Cook 2007, esp. Chapter 1.

  19. 19.

    Cook 1990b, 1994.

  20. 20.

    Cotta 1612, 1–2.

  21. 21.

    Ellis 1963.

  22. 22.

    Sloane 1707, vol 1 sig. Bv.

  23. 23.

    Baglivi 1704, 5, 9, 15. Original published as Baglivi, De praxi medica. Ad priscam observandi rationem revocanda (Rome: Typis Dominici Antonii Herculis, 1696).

  24. 24.

    Boerhaave 1743, 63, 71, 42.

  25. 25.

    Cook 1989a.

  26. 26.

    Glanvill 1668, 7–8.

  27. 27.

    Stubbe 1670b.

  28. 28.

    Frank 1979.

  29. 29.

    Davis 1971.

  30. 30.

    Frank 1980; Bylebyl 1979.

  31. 31.

    Bylebyl 1978.

  32. 32.

    Quoted from Chaney 1988, 16.

  33. 33.

    Birken 1977, 306, 328–330.

  34. 34.

    Woolfson 1998, 21–23.

  35. 35.

    For Clusius, see Cook 2007; Egmond et al. 2007.

  36. 36.

    Keynes 1966.

  37. 37.

    Annals, 1:7b–20a.

  38. 38.

    Cook 1989b, 1994.

  39. 39.

    Cook 1985.

  40. 40.

    Ibid.

  41. 41.

    Webster 1967, 1979.

  42. 42.

    Cook 1987.

  43. 43.

    I have in mind, for example, the important work of Pagel 1967, 1969, who argued that it was Harvey’s “Aristotelianism” that created the possibility for his discovery.

  44. 44.

    See the fundamental work of van Berkel 1983, a revised and translated version of which is due soon.

  45. 45.

    Garber 2001, 51, also 85–110; also see Garber 1978.

  46. 46.

    For Descartes in the Netherlands, see Cook 2007, 227ff.; quotations from Descartes 1985, 3:21, 1:134, 149.

  47. 47.

    Quotations from Descartes 1985, 1:99, 3:59.

  48. 48.

    Descartes 1985, 1:143.

  49. 49.

    Descartes 1985, 1:143, 144.

  50. 50.

    Descartes 1985, 2:56.

  51. 51.

    Descartes 1985, 2:11.

  52. 52.

    Descartes 1985, 2:56.

  53. 53.

    Descartes 1985, 2:61.

  54. 54.

    Shapiro 2007.

  55. 55.

    Les Passions de l’Ame, in Descartes 1985, I:403.

  56. 56.

    Cook 1999, and for the “radical enlightenment,” see esp. Israel 2001.

  57. 57.

    Verbeek 1991, 1992, 2000; and, for example, Lennon and Easton 1992.

  58. 58.

    Most powerfully and provocatively put in Shapin 1994.

  59. 59.

    Mokyr 2002.

  60. 60.

    A rather distressing recent example is the paperback edition of Wootton 2006.

  61. 61.

    Esp. chapter 5 of Cook 2007.

  62. 62.

    Boyle 1663; Hodges 1666.

  63. 63.

    Aubrey 1949.

  64. 64.

    Pittis 1715, 40–41.

References

  • Aubrey, John. 1949. Aubrey’s Brief Lives, edited by O. L. Dick. London: Secker and Warburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baglivi, Giorgio. 1704. The Practice of Physick. London: Printed for Andr. Bell et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Berkel, K. 1983. Isaac Beeckman (1588–1637) en de mechanisering van het wereldbeeld. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birken, William J. 1977. The Fellows of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 1603–1643: a social study. PhD dissertation University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerhaave, Herman. 1743. Academical Lectures. London: W. Innys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Robert. 1663. Usefulnesse of Experimental Naturall Philosophy. Oxford: Printed by Hen. Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1978. William Harvey: a conventional medical revolutionary. Journal of the American Medical Association 239:1295–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1979. The medical side of Harvey’s discovery: the normal and the abnormal. In William Harvey and His Age, edited by J. J. Bylebyl. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlino, Andrea. 1999. Books of the Body: Anatomical Ritual and Renaissance Learning, translated by J. Tedeschi and A. C. Tedeschi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, Edward. 1988. Quo vadis? Travel as education and the impact of Italy in the sixteenth century. In International Currents in Educational Ideas and Practices, edited by P. Cunningham and C. Brock, 1–28. Evington: History of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1985. ‘Against Common Right and Reason’: The College of Physicians against Dr. Thomas Bonham. American Journal of Legal History 29:301–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1986. The Decline of the Old Medical Regime in Stuart London. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1987. The society of chemical physicians, the new philosophy, and the restoration court. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 61:61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1989a. Physicians and the new philosophy: Henry Stubbe and the virtuosi-­physicians. In Medical Revolution in the Seventeenth Century, edited by R. French and A. Wear, 246–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1989b. Policing the health of London: The College of Physicians and the early Stuart monarche. Social History of Medicine 2:1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1990a. Sir John Colbatch and Augustan medicine: Experimentalism, character and entrepreneurialism. Annals of Science 47:475–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1990b. The new philosophy and medicine in seventeenth-century England. In Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, edited by D. C. Lindberg and R. S. Westman, 397–436. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1991. Physick and natural history in seventeenth-century England. In Revolution and Continuity: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Early Modern Science, edited by P. Barker and R. Ariew, 63–80. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1993. The cutting edge of a revolution? Medicine and natural history near the shores of the North Sea. In Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe, edited by J. V. Field and F. A. J. L. James, 45–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1994. Good advice and little medicine: The professional authority of early modern English physicians. Journal of British Studies 33:1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1999. Bernard Mandeville and the therapy of the ‘Clever Politician’. Journal of the History of Ideas 60:101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 2007. Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine and Science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotta, John. 1612. A Short Discoverie of the Unobserved Dangers of Severall Sorts of Ignorant and Unconsiderate Practisers of Physicke in England. London: Imprinted for William Iones and Richard Boyle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Andrew. 1991. How the Principia got its name; Or, taking natural philosophy seriously. History of Science 29:377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Andrew, and Perry Williams. 1993. De-centring the ‘big picture’: The Origins of Modern Science and the modern origins of science. British Journal for the History of Science 26:407–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine. 1988. The factual sensibility. Isis 79:452–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Audrey. 1971. Some implications of the circulation theory for disease theory and treatment in the seventeenth century. Journal of the History of Medicine 26:28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, Peter. 1985. Totius in verba: Rhetoric and authority in the early Royal Society. Isis 76:145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dear, Peter. 1990. Miracles, experiments, and the ordinary course of nature. Isis 81:663–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debus, Allen G. 1966. The English Paracelsians. New York: Franklin Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. 1985–1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, edited by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff and D. Murdoch. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eamon, William. 1983. Technology as magic in the late Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Janus 70:171–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eamon, William. 1993. ’With the rules of life and an enema’: Leonardo Fioravanti’s medical primitivism. In Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe, edited by J. V. Field and F. A. J. L. James, 29–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eamon, William. 1994. Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egmond, Florike. 2008. Apothecaries as experts and brokers in the sixteenth-century network of the naturalist Carolus Clusius. History of Universities 23:59–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egmond, Florike, Paul Hoftijzer, and Robert Visser, eds. 2007. Carolus Clusius: Towards a Cultural History of a Renaissance Naturalist. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Frank H. 1963. Garth’s Harveian Oration. Journal of the History of Medicine 18:8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, Karl. 1978. Chlorosis and chronic disease in nineteenth-century Britain: The social construction of somatic illness in a capitalistic society. Social History 3:167–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlen, Paula. 1994. Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlen, Paula. 1998. Possessing the past: The material world of the Italian Renaissance. American Historical Review 103:83–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Robert G., Jr. 1979. The image of Harvey in commonwealth and restoration England. In William Harvey and His Age, edited by J. J. Bylebyl, 103–143. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Robert G., Jr. 1980. Harvey and the Oxford Physiologists: Scientific Ideas and Social Interaction. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, Daniel. 1978. Science and certainty in Descartes. In Descartes: Critical and Interpretive Essays, edited by M. Hooker, 114–151. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, Daniel. 2001. Descartes Embodied: Reading Cartesian Philosophy Through Cartesian Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, Faye Marie. 1992. The faculty of medicine before 1500. In The History of the University of Oxford, vol. II: Late Medieval Oxford, edited by J. I. Catto and R. Evans, 373–405. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, Faye Marie. 1997. Roger Bacon and medicine: The paradox of the forbidden fruit and the secrets of long life. In Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, edited by J. Hackett, 337–364. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillispie, Charles C. 1960. The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanvill, Joseph. 1668. Plus Ultra: or the Progress and Advancement of Knowledge Since the Days of Aristotle. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadden, Richard. 1994. On the Shoulders of Merchants: Exchange and the Mathematical Conception of Nature in Early Modern Europe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. Rupert. 1954. The Scientific Revolution, 1500–1800: The Formation of the Modern Scientific Attitude. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. Rupert. 1974. Medicine and the Royal Society. In Medicine in Seventeenth Century England, edited by A. G. Debus, 421–452. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. Rupert. 1983. The Revolution in Science 1500–1750. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaway, Owen. 1975. The Chemists and the Word: The Didactic Origins of Chemistry. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Craig Ashley. 2009. The English Virtuoso: Art, Medicine, and Antiquarianism in the Age of Empiricism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, Deborah E. 2007. The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the Scientific Revolution. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, Nathaniel. 1666. Vindiciae medicinae et medicorum: Or an apology. London: John Field

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Michael. 1976. The social basis and changing fortunes of an early scientific institution: An analysis of the membership of the Royal Society, 1660–1685. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 31:9–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Michael. 1982. The Royal Society and Its Fellows 1660–1700: The Morphology of an Early Scientific Institution. Chalfont St. Giles: British Society for the History of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, Jonathan I. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenner, Mark S. R., and Patrick Wallis. 2007. The medical marketplace. In Medicine and the Market in England and Its Colonies, c. 1450–c. 1850, edited by M. S. R. Jenner and P. Wallis, 1–23. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ellis. 1960. The life and works of Guilhelmus Fabricius Hildanus (1560–1634). Medical History 4:112–134, 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassell, Lauren. 2005. Medicine and Magic in Elizabethan London: Simon Foreman: Astrologer, Alchemist, and Physician. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, Joel. 1998. Economy and Nature in the Fourteenth Century: Money, Market Exchange, and the Emergence of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, Geoffrey. 1966. The Life of William Harvey. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1976. Mathematical versus experimental traditions in the development of physical science. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7:1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts. new ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, Thomas M., and Patrica Ann Easton. 1992. The Cartesian Empiricism of François Bayle. New York and London: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Joseph M. 1983. Natural history and the history of the Scientific Revolution. Clio 13:57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. E. R. 1979. Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Pamela O. 2001. Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, Michael. 1981. Mystical Bedlam: Madness, Anxiety, and Healing in Seventeenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, Joel. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, Walter. 1958. Paracelsus: An Introduction to Philosophical Medicine in the Era of the Renaissance. New York: S. Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, Walter. 1967. William Harvey’s Biological Ideas: Selected Aspects and Historical Background. New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, Walter. 1969. William Harvey revisited. History of Science 8,9:1–29; 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittis, W. 1715. Some Memoires of the Life of John Radcliffe, M.D. London: E. Curll.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeds, Karen Meier. 1991. Botany in Medieval and Renaissance Universities. Harvard Dissertations in the History of Science. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer. 1986. Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven. 1994. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Lisa, ed. 2007. The Correspondence Between Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Barbara J. 1983. Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationship Between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloane, Hans. 1707. A Voyage To the Islands Madera, Barbados, Nieves, S. Christophers and Jamaica. 2 vols-1725 London: Printed by B.M. for the author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Pamela. 1994. The Business of Alchemy: Science and Culture in the Holy Roman Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Pamela. 2004. The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe, Henry. 1670a. Legends No Histories. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe, Henry. 1670b. The Plus Ultra Reduced to a Non Plus. London: Printed for the author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, Theo. 1991. Descartes and the problem of atheism: The Utrecht crisis. Nederlands Archief voor Kerkgeschiedenis 71:211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, Theo. 1992. Descartes and the Dutch: Early Reactions to Cartesian Philosophy, 1637–1650. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, Theo. 2000. The invention of nature: Descartes and Regius. In Descartes’ natural philosophy, edited by S. Gaukroger, J. Schuster and J. Sutton, 149–167. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Charles. 1967. Harvey’s De generatione: Its origin and relevance to the theory of circulation. British Journal of the History of Science 3:262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Charles. 1976. The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform 1626–1660. New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Charles. 1979. William Harvey and the crisis of medicine in Jacobean England. In William Harvey and His Age: the Professional and Social Context of the Discovery of the Circulation, edited by J. J. Bylebyl, 1–27. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Charles. 2008. Paracelsus: Medicine, Magic and Mission at the End of Time. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfson, Jonathan. 1998. Padua and the Tudors: English Students in Italy 1485–1603. Cambridge: James Clark & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, David. 2006. Bad Medicine: Doctors Doing Harm Since Hippocrates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cook, H.J. (2010). Victories for Empiricism, Failures for Theory: Medicine and Science in the Seventeenth Century. In: Wolfe, C.T., Gal, O. (eds) The Body as Object and Instrument of Knowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3686-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics