Skip to main content

Kaila and Reichenbach as Protagonists of ‘Naturphilosophie’

  • Chapter
The Vienna Circle in the Nordic Countries

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook ((VCIY,volume 14))

Eino Kaila (1890–1958) brought new ideas to Finnish philosophy and psychology. He studied at the University of Helsinki in 1908–10 and made study visits, first to Paris in 1911, where he listened to Henri Bergson's lectures, and also to Berlin in 1914. Kaila's dissertation, Über die Motivation und Entscheidung, appeared in 1916. He worked as a critic of theatre and literature and as a dramatist in the Finnish National Theatre, before being nominated professor of philosophy in 1921 to the newly founded University of Turku. There he initiated the founding of the first Finnish institute of experimental psychology. In addition to philosophical works, he published works in psychology. Kaila stayed in Turku until 1930, when he became professor of theoretical philosophy and psychology at the University of Helsinki. In 1948 he was invited to become a member of the recently established Academy of Finland. One may speak of Kaila's Turku period (1921–1930) and his Helsinki period (1930–1958). Kaila considered himself a philosopher of nature, whose task is to articulate, using all available means of science, a coherent conception of the world and of mind's place within it. As fellow of the Finnish Academy, he devoted himself to a great project in natural philosophy. The project had two components: first, a rigorous systematic study aiming at a unitary conception of nature, and second, the explication of this conception in a style accessible to a broader audience. The systematic study was to be realized in three volumes; only the first of these (Kaila (1956)) appeared before his death. As to the more popular work, it was meant to be divided into four parts, of which only the first is complete. The entire planned work was entitled as Hahmottuva maailma (“The world as a structuring whole”). Its first part is devoted to the problem of reality; it concerns the perceptual and conceptual components of everyday experience, and it has been translated from Finnish into German (cf. (Kaila (1962)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

Kaila, Eino:

  • (1925): Der Satz vom Ausgleich des Zufalls und das Kausalprinzip. Erkenntnislogische Studien. Annales Universitatis Fennicae Aboensis, Ser. B Humaniora, Tom. II, N:o 2, Turku.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1926): Die Prinzipien der Wahrscheinlichkeitslogik. Annales Universitatis Fennicae Aboensis, Ser. B Humaniora, Tom. IV, N:o 1, Turku.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1928a): Probleme der Deduktion. Annales Universitatis Aboensis, Ser. B Humaniora, Tom. IV, N:o 2, Turku.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1928b): Beiträge zu einer synthetischen Philosophie. Annales Universitatis Aboensis., Ser. B Humaniora, Tom. I V, N:o 3, Turku.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1929): Nykyinen maailmankäsitys. Otava, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1930): Der logistische Neupositivismus. Eine kritische Studie. Annales Universitatis Aboensis, Ser. B Humaniora, Tom. XIII, Turku.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1936): Über das System der Wirklichkeitsbegriffe. Ein Beitrag zum logischen Empirismus. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Fasc. 2, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1939): Inhimillinen tieto. Mitä se on ja mitä se ei ole. Otava, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1939b): Den mänskliga kunskapen. Vad den är och vad den icke är. Översättning av G. H. von Wright. Söderström, Helsingfors.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1941): Über den physikalischen Realitätsbegriff. Zweiter Beitrag zum logischen Empirismus. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Fasc. 4, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1950): Zur Metatheorie der Quantenmechanik. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Fasc. 5, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1956): Terminalkausalität als die Grundlage eines unitarischen Naturbegriffs. Eine naturphilosophische Untersuchung. Erster Teil. Terminalkausalität in der Atomdynamik. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Fasc. 10, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1962) Die perzeptuellen und konzeptuellen Komponenten der Alltagserfahrung. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Fasc. 13, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

Reichenbach, Hans:

  • (1916): Der Begriff der Wahrscheinlichkeit für die mathematische Darstellung der Wirklichkeit. Inaugural-Dissertation, Universität Erlangen, 1915. (In: A. Kamlah und Maria Reichenbach: Hans Reichenbach. Gesammelte Werke. Band 5, Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • (1920): Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis a priori. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1920b): ‘Philosophische Kritik der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung’.Die Naturwissenschaften, vol. 8, no. 3 (46 – 55). (In: A. Kamlah und Maria Reichenbach: Hans Reichenbach. Gesammelte Werke. Band 5, Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • (1924): Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Vieweg, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1925): ‘Metaphysik und Naturwissenschaft’. Symposion, vol. 1, no. 2 (158 – 76).

    Google Scholar 

  • (1928): Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin und Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1930): Atom und Kosmos. Das physikalische Weltbild der Gegenwart. Deutsche Buch-Gemeinschaft, Berlin. English translation: Atom and Cosmos. The World of Modern Physics. George Braziller, Inc., New York 1957 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  • (1931): Ziele und Wege der heutigen Naturphilosophie. Felix Meiner, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1931b): ‘Zum Anschaulichkeitsproblem der Geometrie’. Erkenntnis, vol. 2, no. 1 (61–72).

    Google Scholar 

  • (1933): ‘Rudolf Carnap: Der logische Aufbau der Welt’. Kantstudien 38 (199– 201).

    Google Scholar 

  • (1935): Wahrscheinlichkeitslehre. Eine Untersuchung über die logischen und mathematischen Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. A. W. Sijthoff's Uitgeversmaatschappij N.V., Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1938): Experience and Prediction. An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1944): Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1947): Elements of Symbolic Logic. The Macmillan Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1951): The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1978a): ‘The Causal Structure of the World and the Difference between Past and Future’. In: Maria Reichenbach & Robert S. Cohen (ed): Hans Reichenbach, Selected Essays: 1909–1953. Vol II (81-119). Reidel, Dordrecht (Originally (1925), ‘Die Kausalstruktur der Welt und der Unterschied von Vergangenheit und Zukunft’).

    Google Scholar 

  • (1978b): ‘The Aims and Methods of Physical Knowledge’. In: Reichenbach & Cohen, Vo l II (120–225). Reidel, Dordrecht. (Originally (1929), ‘Ziele und Wege der physikalischen Erkenntnis’).

    Google Scholar 

  • (1991): The Direction of Time. Edited by Maria Reichenbach. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles. (First published 1956).

    Google Scholar 

Carnap, Rudolf:

  • (1928): Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Im Weltkreis-Verlag, Berlin/Schlachtensee.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1931) ‘ E. Kaila: Der logistische Neupositivismus. Eine kritische Studie.’ Erkenntnis 2 (75–77).

    Google Scholar 

Other sources:

  • Haller, Rudolf / Stadler, Friedrich: Wien—Berlin–Prag. Der Aufstieg der wissenschaftlichen Philosophie. Verlag Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Wien (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manninen, Juha: ‘Ennen Wienin piiriä: Moritz Schlick, Hans Reichenbach ja Eino Kaila’. In: Järjen todellisuus. Juhlakirja Markku Mäelle. Sophopolis, Oulu (2002) (245–275).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, Friedrich: Studien zum Wiener Kreis. Ursprung, Entwicklung und Wirkung des Logischen Empirismus im Kontext, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siitonen, A. (2010). Kaila and Reichenbach as Protagonists of ‘Naturphilosophie’. In: Manninen, J., Stadler, F. (eds) The Vienna Circle in the Nordic Countries. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3683-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics