Skip to main content

Bioremediation of Xenobiotics-contaminated Sites: Concept and Selected Case Studies

  • Chapter
Bioremediation Technology
  • 2677 Accesses

Abstract

Amongst the knowledge-based technologies, biotechnology is a frontier technology, which has the potential to provide substantial benefits to society in a wide range of sectors such as agriculture, medical and health, forestry, animal husbandry, environment protection, and improving the quality of products and services. Industrialization in developing countries is causing considerable environmental damage, as the conventional responses of end-of- pipe pollution controls are inefficient and expensive. The social and economic costs of environmental damage caused by the prevailing industrial growth in India have been estimated to be much higher than the required expenditure of 0.5-1.0 percent of GNP for pollution control. The clean up of xenobiotics and anthropogenic contaminants, which are introduced in the environment following rapid industrialization, is one of the environment related problems currently being encountered globally. The least cost clean-up technology involving bioremediation originates in environmental biotechnology, which warrants interdisciplinary approach involving such disciplines as environmental and chemical engineering, earth sciences, chemistry, toxicology, ecology, microbiology and biochemistry. In addition, the demographic compulsions and declining per capita natural resources necessitate the developing countries to optimize land and water use and restore environmental quality but, at the same

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, M. (1999). Biodegradation and Bioremediation, 2nd Edition. Academic Press: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, E.L. and Coats, J.R. (1998). Phytoremediation. In: Pesticide Remediation in Soil and Water. Kearney, P.C. and T. Roberts (Eds.), Wiley. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpus, J.A. and Aust, S.D. (1987). Biodegradation of DDT [1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4- chlorophenyl)ethane] by the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 53: 2001-2008.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (1997). Innovative Uses of Compost. Composting of Soils Contaminated by Explosives, EPA/530/F-997-045. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/compost/ explos.pdf

  • Frazar, C. (2000). The Bioremediation and Phytoremediation of Pesticide-contaminated Sites. National Network of Environmental Studies (NNEMS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harner, T., Wideman, J.L., Jatunen, L.M.M., Bidleman, T.F. and Parkhurst, W.J. (1999). Residues of organochlorine pesticides in Alabama soils. Env. Pollut. 106: 323-332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice-Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchini, L.C., Peres, T.B. and De Andrea, M.M. (2000). Monitoring of pesticide residues in a cotton crop soil. J Environ. Sci. Health B35: 51-59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (1998). MS library database in Saturn Format, Varian, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandya, G.H. (2003). Investigations of GC detectors performance and validation. Ind. J. Environ. Health. 45: 139-142.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandya, G.H., Kumar, Koel, Devi, S. Saravana, Kondawar, V.K. and Chakrabarti, T. (2006). Evaluation of HCH, DDT and Endosulfan Levels in Soil by Gas Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Soil and Sediment Contamination 15: 529-541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, David (2000). Personal Communication. Grace Bioremediation Technologies, Mississauga, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safferman, S.I., Lamar, R.T., Vonderhaar, S., Neogy, R., Haught, R.C. and Krishnan, E.R. (1995). Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 50: 237-251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1984). Environmental Health Criteria: Endosulfan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, W.R. & Co. (1999). Grace Daramend TM Bioremediation Technology: Pesticides/Herbicides.www.daramend.com/pestherb.htm June 8, 2000.

  • http://www.elp.gov.bc.ca/epd/remediation/guidance/technical/pdf/tg08-draft.pdf http://environment.gov.ab.ca/info/ www.teriin.org/index.php?option=com_casestudy

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Capital Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chakrabarti, T., Ghosh, T.K. (2010). Bioremediation of Xenobiotics-contaminated Sites: Concept and Selected Case Studies. In: Fulekar, M.H. (eds) Bioremediation Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3678-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics