Skip to main content

Application of Parity Classified Neurogenetic Models to Analyze the Impact of Climatic Uncertainty on Water Footprint

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Impact of Climate Change on Natural Resource Management

Abstract

Water footprint of an individual, community, or business is defined as the total volume of freshwater that is used to produce the goods and services consumed by the individual or community, or produced by the business. Neurogenetic models were widely used in the prediction of hydrologic variables, and outcome of such applications were found to be satisfactory. The irregular rainfall and temperature pattern, and degradation of watersheds were causing worldwide reduction of water availability (UNFCC). As water footprint is directly related to water availability and also shows the demand from industrial consumers, the present study tried to estimate the impact of climate change on water footprint between two river basins of East India with the help of neurogenetic models. The climate change scenarios were generated with the help of PRECIS climate models, and future runoff was estimated by a neurogenetic model trained with orthopareto dataset. The output from the neurogenetic model, named as PARITYCGD, was compared with a neurogenetic model trained with normal dataset (NGHYD) and conceptual hydrologic models. According to the results, the neurogenetic model trained with orthopareto dataset was selected as the better model among the five models, which shows that neural models trained with orthopareto dataset learn a problem better than a neurogenetic model trained with normal dataset. From the prediction of stream flow, water footprint of the sampling regions were calculated and according to the estimations, water footprint would be reduced in both A2 and B2 climate change scenarios where reductions would be more pronounced in A2 than in B2. Although, due to data dependency of neurogenetic models, the PARITYCGD model may not work for other basins but for the present study, it was found to have better accuracy than the conceptual hydrologic model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad M, Ghumman A, Ahmad S (2009) Estimation of Clark’s instantaneous unit hydrograph parameters and development of direct surface runoff hydrograph. Water Resour Manage 23:2417–2435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blazkova S, Beven KJ, Kulasova A (2002) On constraining topmodel hydrograph simulations using partial saturated area information. Hydrol Process 16(2):441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das NG (1991) Statistical methods in commerce, accountance and economics, Part – 1. M. Das & Co., Kolkata, pp 25–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK (2008) Globalization of water: sharing the planet’s freshwater resources. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical sciences basis, retrieved on http://ipcc-wgl.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html. on 30th April, 2009

  • Lopez JJ, Gimena FN, Goni M, Agirre U (2005) Analysis of a unit hydrograph model based on watershed geomorphology represented as a cascade of reservoirs. Agric Water Manage 77(1–3):128–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumder M, Roy P, Mazumdar A (2010) Watershed modeling of river Damodar with the help of neural network and genetic algorithm, PhD thesis, school of water resources engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanya K (1994) Engineering hydrology, 2nd edn. Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, pp 60–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui J (2005) Estimation of design flood hydrograph for an ungauged watershed. Water Resour Manage 19(6):813–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taskinen A, Bruen M (2007) Incremental distributed modelling investigation in a small agricultural catchment: 1. Overland flow with comparison with the unit hydrograph model. Hydrol Process 21(1):80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanielista M, Kersten R, Eaglin R (1987) Hydrology: water quantity and quality control. Wiley, New York, p 208

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh K, Yang J, Tung Y (1997) Regionalization of unit hydrograph parameters: 2. Uncertainty analysis. Stochast Hydrol Hydraulic 11(2):173–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mrinmoy Majumder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Majumder, M., Barman, R.N., Jana, B.K., Roy, P., Mazumdar, A. (2010). Application of Parity Classified Neurogenetic Models to Analyze the Impact of Climatic Uncertainty on Water Footprint. In: Jana, B., Majumder, M. (eds) Impact of Climate Change on Natural Resource Management. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3581-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics