Abstract
Food and water provide an attractive and convenient target for intentional contamination. Food and water often follow complex production, and supply systems and the technical, physical and operational barriers are unbounded as compared to other types of potential targets. Globalization also plays a large role in making this target more appealing with the rapid and widespread distribution of food, and food ingredients from many locations providing potential for a greater dispersal of an agent. In short, there is potential for significant vulnerabilities all along the food and water continuum. Another factor that contributes to the attractiveness of food and water as a target for intentional contamination is the fact that often in the initial stages of a response to a foodborne illness outbreak related to food contamination; it could be very difficult to distinguish the intentional from the accidental. This potential lag in reaction time to the intentional contamination may facilitate an ongoing and wider spread of the agent in addition to providing the perpetrator with the opportunity for to elude capture.
The attributes that make food and water very attractive as a target can also make it a very challenging target. Much of the food that we eat is not a single component but often a blend of components. Each matrix is slightly different and each potential agent may react differently when exposed to the matrix. Due to the complex nature of food and food systems, the advancing technologies in genome sequencing etc. it is difficult to create a finite list of potential chemical and biological threat agents especially when discussing potential terrorism threats to food and water. In this presentation we will review some of the history of intentional contamination of food, and explore some of the characteristics of biological and chemical threat agents that would make them attractive for use as possible weapons against a given population.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
James A. Romano, Brian J. Lukey, Harry Salem: Chemical Warfare Agents 2007.
Byconederbyshire.ed.uk
Thompson, Christopher: The Bio-Terrorism Threat by Non-State Actors: Hype or Horror”. A thesis published by the Naval Postgraduate School, California, 2006 pp.20–30 http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/theses/thompson06.pdf
Cote, Francois, Genevieve Smith, Chemoterrorism Government of Canada Publication 15, January, 2002
BBC News Word Edition, “Japan's Curry Killer Sentenced to Death”Wed 11 December, 2002
CBS News “Qaeda Tested Poison Beer and Burger Plot” March 25, 2006
CDC MMWRH September 19, 2008 Thallium Poisoning from Eating Contaminated Cake — Iraq 2008
WHO — October 2008 — Melamine-contamination event, China, September–October 2008
MacIntyre, C Raina: Development of a Risk-Priority Score for Category A Bioterrorism Agends as an Aid for Public Health Policy. Military Medicine, 2007
Retez, Lisa D Ali S. Khan, Scott R. Lillibridge, Stephen M. Ostroff, and James M. Hughes Public Health Assessment of Potential Biological Terrorism Agents Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Vol. 8, No. 2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hansen, C. (2010). An Exploration of Potential Chemical and Biological Threat Agents. In: Koukouliou, V., Ujevic, M., Premstaller, O. (eds) Threats to Food and Water Chain Infrastructure. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3546-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3546-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3544-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3546-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)