Skip to main content

Criteria for Designing Sewage Treatment Plants for Enhanced Removal of Organic Micropollutants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle

Part of the book series: Environmental Pollution ((EPOL,volume 16))

Abstract

This work addresses the problem of micropollutants removal in sewage treatment plants trying to identify the main factors influencing their fate and behaviour. Firstly the most significant groups of substances that are continuously emitted into the environment are presented and the physico-chemical properties and biodegradability of representative compounds are discussed. This information is crucial to understand the main removal mechanisms occurring in sewage treatment plants, such as sorption, biodegradation and chemical transformation, as well as the distribution pathways of micropollutants once released into the environment. Selected case studies are discussed to identify some key operational factors which influence the removal of these compounds, including the use of additives, temperature, biomass concentration and characteristics (microbial diversity, structure, etc.), as well as hydraulic and sludge retention time. A discussion focused on comparison of data corresponding to several configurations of activated sludge systems and membrane biological reactors is presented. So far, it is not clear how the type of technology affects micropollutants removal. A number of conclusions trying to explain the influence of different factors and some guidelines useful to enhance the removal of micropollutants in sewage treatment plants are presented.

Organic micropollutants refer to a wide group of carbon containing chemical compounds, mainly of xenobiotic nature, created by industrial processes either intentionally or as by-products, such as pharmaceuticals, personal care products, hormones, pesticides, brominated flame retardants, plasticizers, perfluorinated compounds, etc. Some of these substances are being considered for inclusion in the list of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), i.e. compounds that are resistant to environmental degradation through biological, chemical or photochemical processes, thus capable of long-range transport, bioaccumulation in human and animal tissue, biomagnification in food chains, and exerting potential significant impacts on human health and the environment (Katsoyiannis and Samara 2007; Clarke et al. 2008; Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants 2009). Moreover, a significant number of these substances, those defined as Endocrine Disrupting Compounds (EDCs), may exert estrogenic activity on various higher organisms (Kester et al. 2000).

During the last decade, the focus of environmental research has been extended from the more “classic” POPs such as organochlorine pesticides or Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) to the so called “emerging contaminants” such as Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs). Recent advances in analytical techniques, mainly related to the increasing use of Liquid Chromatography (LC) coupled with Mass Spectrometry (MS), have enabled the possibility of determining a wide variety of micropollutants which, although denoted as “emerging” because information about occurrence is fairly recent, have been discharged into the environment along decades, mainly in water bodies (Ternes 2007). That is the case of PPCPs or the most recently reported Perfluorinated Alkylated substances (PFAs), a large group of chemicals widely used to create inert surfaces for different industrial and consumer products since the 1950s, but recently detected in waste dumps or sewage (Clara et al. 2008). Although these compounds are present at low concentrations, many of them raise considerable toxicological concerns, either as sole compounds or also when present as components of complex mixtures.

The objective of this chapter is to present the main removal mechanisms that take place throughout Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs), since municipal wastewaters represent a significant emission source of micropollutants (Neumann et al. 2002; Joss et al. 2005). Most of the existing units operate with variations of the well known Activated Sludge (AS) process. However, one innovative technology that is nowadays gaining popularity is the Membrane Biological Reactor (MBR). Postreatment methods, such as activated carbon or through ozone or advanced oxidation technologies, although very interesting as a polishing step leading to almost complete removal of these substances, can be considered as an “externality” of the common primary-secondary treatment, and are not discussed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ben, W., Qiang, Z., Adams, C., Zhang, H., & Chen, L. (2008). Simultaneous determination of sulfonamides, tetracyclines and tiamulin in swine wastewater by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatrography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1202, 173-180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard, M., Müller, J., & Knepper, T. P. (2006). Biodegradation of persistent polar pollutants in wastewater: Comparison of an optimised lab-scale membrane bioreactor and activated sludge treatment. Water Research, 40, 3419-3428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bester, K. (2004). Retention characteristics and balance assessment for two polycyclic musk fragrances (HHCB and AHTN) in a typical German sewage treatment plant. Chemosphere, 57(8), 863-870.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breitholtz, M., Nyholm, J. R., Karlsson, J., & Andersson, P. L. (2008). Are individual NOEC levels safe for mixtures? A study on mixture toxicity of brominated flame-retardants in the copepod Nitocra spinipes. Chemosphere, 72, 1242-1249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carballa, M., Omil, F., & Lema, J. M. (2005). Removal of cosmetic ingredients and pharmaceuticals in sewage primary treatment. Water Research, 39(19), 4790-4796.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carballa, M., Omil, F., Ternes, T., & Lema, J. M. (2007). Fate of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) during anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Water Research, 41(10), 2139-2150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castiglioni, S., Bagnati, R., Fanelli, R., Pomati, F., Calamari, D., & Zuccato, E. (2006). Removal of pharmaceuticals in sewage treatment plants in Italy. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(1), 357-363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, H., Elefsiniotis, P., & Singhal, N. (2005). Biodegradation of 2, 4-dicholophenoxyacetic acid using an acidogenic anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 4(1), 57-63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cicek, N., Franco, J. P., Suidan, M. T., Vincent, U., & Manem, J. (1999). Characterization and comparison of a membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge system in the treatment of wastewater containing high-molecular weight compounds. Water Environment Research, 71(1), 64-70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cicek, N., Macomer, J., Davel, J., Suidan, M. T., Audic, J., & Genestet, P. (2001). Effect of solids retention time on the performances and biological characteristics of a membrane bioreactor. Water Science and Technology, 43(11), 43-50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clara, M., Kreuzinger, N., Strenn, B., Gans, O., & Kroiss, H. (2005). The solids retention time - a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants. Water Research, 39(1), 97-106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clara, M., Scheffknecht, C., Scharf, S., Weiss, S., & Gans, O. (2008). Emissions of perfluorinated alkylated substances (PFAS) from point sources—identification of relevant branches. Water Science and Technology, 58(1), 59-66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., Porter, N., Symons, R., Marriott, P., Ades, P., Stevenson, G., et al. (2008). Polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polybrominated biphenyls in Australian sewage sludge. Chemosphere, 73, 980-989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Covaci, A., & Dirtu, A. C. (2008). Brominated flame retardants: analytical, toxicologycal and environmental aspects. In Applications of mass spectrometry in life safety. Springer (ISSN: 1874-6489). pp. 153-184, Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drillia, P., Dokianakis, S. N., Fountoulakis, M. S., Kornaros, M., Stamatelatou, K., & Lyberatos, G. (2005). On the occasional biodegradation of pharmaceuticals in the activated sludge process: The example of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 122, 259-265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA. (2008). Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and their salts. The EFSA Journal, 653, 1-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrez, I., Carballa, M., Boon, N., & Verstraete, W. (2008). Biological removal of 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) in an aerated nitrifying fixed bed reactor during ammonium starvation. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 84(1), 119-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Gutiérrez, A., Jover, E., Bayona, J. M., & Albaigés, J. (2007). Influence of water filtration on the determination of a wide range of dissolved contaminants at parts-per-trillion levels. Analytica Chimica Acta, 583, 202-209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, S., Petrovic, M., & Barceló, D. (2007). Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal lwastewater - comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment. Chemosphere, 67, 335-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M., Li, Y., & Gu, G. (2008). The effects of hydraulic retention time and sludge retention time on the fate of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in a laboratory-scale anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic activated sludge system. Bioresource Technology, 99, 8107-8111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Hulscher, T. E. M., & Cornelissen, G. (1996). Effect of temperature on sorption equilibrium and sorption kinetics of organic micropollutants - a review. Chemosphere, 32, 609-626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. A. H., Voulvoulis, N., & Lester, J. N. (2002). Aquatic environmental assessment of the top 25 English prescription pharmaceuticals. Water Research, 36, 5013-5022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. A. H., Voulvoulis, N., & Lester, J. N. (2007). The occurrence and removal of selected pharmaceutical compounds in a sewage treatment works utilising activated sludge treatment. Environmental Pollution, 145, 738-744.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joss, A., Keller, E., Alder, A. C., Gobel, A., McArdell, C. S., Ternes, T., et al. (2005). Removal of pharmaceuticals and fragrances in biological wastewater treatment. Water Research, 3, 3139-3152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joss, A., Zabczynski, S., Gobel, A., Hoffmann, B., Loffler, D., McArdell, C. S., et al. (2006). Biological degradation of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater treatment: proposing a classification scheme. Water Research, 40(8), 1686-1696.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., Dinsdale, R. M., & Guwy, A. J. (2008). Multiresidue methods for the analysis of pharmaceuticals, personal care products and illicit drugs in surface waster and wastewater by solid-phase extraction and ultra performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 391, 1293-1308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katsoyiannis, A., & Samara, C. (2007). Comparison of active and passive sampling for the determination of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in sewage treatment plants. Chemosphere, 67, 1375-1382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kester, M. H. A., Bulduk, S., Tibboel, D., Meinl, W., Glatt, H., Falany, C. N., et al. (2000). Potent inhibition of estrogen sulfotransferase by hydroxylated PCB metabolites: a novel pathway explaining the estrogenic activity of PCBs. Endocrinology, 141(5), 1897-1900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, K., Hara, H., & Watanabe, Y. (2007). Elimination of selected acidic pharmaceuticals from municipal wastewater by an activated sludge system and membrane bioreactors. Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 3708-3714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepfer, A., Gnirss, R., Jekel, M., & Reemtsma, T. (2006). Occurrence of benzothiazoles in municipal wastewater and their fate in biological treatment. Water Science and Technology, 50(5), 203-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupper, T., Plagellat, C., Braendli, R. C., de Alencastro, L. F., Grandjean, D., & Tarradellas, J. (2006). Fate and removal of polycyclic musks, UV filters and biocides during wastewater treatment. Water Research, 40(14), 2603-2612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lara-Martin, P. A., Gómez-Parra, A., & González-Mazo, E. (2008). Reactivity and fate of synthetic surfactants in aquatic environments. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 27(8), 684-695.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, A. C., Gregory, B. W., Seward, J. R., Schultz, T. W., & Sayler, G. S. (2000). Mineralization of steroidal hormones by biosolids in wastewater treatment systems in Tennessee USA. Environmental Science and Technology, 34(18), 3925-3931.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. W., Choi, S. P., Thiruvenkatachari, R., Shim, W. G., & Moon, H. (2006). Submerged microfiltration membrane coupled with alum coagulation/powdered activated carbon adsorption for complete decolorization of reactive dyes. Water Research, 40(3), 435-444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R., Wilding, A., Hibberd, A., & Zhou, J. L. (2005). Partition of endocrine-disrupting chemicals between colloids and dissolved phase as determined by cross-flow ultrafiltration. Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 2753-2761.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massé, A., Spérandio, M., & Cabassud, C. (2006). Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water Research, 40, 2405-2415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matamoros, V., Duhec, A., Albaigés, J., & Bayona, J.M. (2008). Photodegradation of Carbamazepine, Ibuprofen, Ketoprofen and 17α-Ethinylestradiol in fresh and seawater. Water, Air and Soil Pollution. 196(1-4), 161-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, G., & Russell, D. A. (1999). Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 12(1), 147-179.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, R., Plant, J. A., Bell, J. N. B., & Voulvoulis, N. (2008). Endocrine disrupting pesticides: Implications for risk assessment. Environment International, 34, 168-183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miège, C., Choubert, J. M., Ribeiro, L. M., Eusèbe, M., & Coquery, M. (2008). Removal efficiency of pharmaceuticals and personal care products with varying wastewater treatment processes and operating conditions - conception of a database and first results. Water Science and Technology, 57(1), 49-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najean, H., Pichon, M., & Rouger, J. (1990). Acclimatation of an anaerobic biomass to high sulphur content pulp mill effluents. Revue des Sciences de l’Eau, 3(3), 293-301.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M., Schutz, R., Schafer, K., Muller, W., Mannheller, W., & Liess, M. (2002). The significance of entry routes as point and non-point sources of pesticides in small streams. Water Research, 36(4), 835-842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, G., Drikas, M., & Hayes, R. (1997). Influence of characterised natural organic material on activated carbon adsorption: II. Effect on pore volume distribution and adsorption of 2-methylisoborneol. Water Research, 31(5), 1065-1073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, N., Epp, B., von Sonntag, C., & Fahlenkamp, H. (2007). Quantification and modeling of the elimination behavior of ecologically problematic wastewater micropollutants by adsorption on powdered and granulated activated carbon. Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 2050-2055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou, C. A., Samaras, P., & Sakellaropoulos, G. P. (2009). Comparative study of phenol and cyanide containing wastewater in CSTR and SBR activated sludge reactors. Bioresource Technology, 100, 31-37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penteado, J. C. P., El Seoud, O. A., & Carvalho, L. R. F. (2006). Alquilbenzeno sulfonato linear: uma abodagem ambiental e analítica. Química Nova, 29(5), 1038-1046.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, D. (2008). Influence of the use of additives for coprecipitation and adsorption in the removal of PPCPs in activated sludges systems. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. A., Adham, S., Redding, A. M., Cannon, F. S., DeCarolis, J., Oppenheimer, J., et al. (2007). Role of membranes and activated carbon in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals. Desalination, 202, 156-181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. (2009). Retrieved April 2009. From http://chm.pops.int.

  • Suárez, S. (2008). Strategies for the treatment of municipal and hospital wastewaters containing Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products. Dissertation, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, S., Carballa, M., Omil, F., & Lema, J. M. (2008). How pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) are removed from urban wastewaters? Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 7, 125-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, S., Lema, J.M. & Omil, F. (2009). 2 Pre-treatment of hospital wastewater by coagulation-flocculation and flotation. Bioresource Technology. 100, 2138-2146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauxe-Wuersch, A., de Alencastro, L. F., Grandjean, D., & Tarradellas, J. (2005). Occurrence of several acidic drugs in sewage treatment plants in Switzerland and risk assessment. Water Research, 39(9), 1761-1772.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ternes, T. (2007). The occurrence of micopollutants in the aquatic environment: a new challenge for water management. Water Science and Technology, 55(12), 327-332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ternes, T. A., Herrmann, N., Bonerz, M., Knacker, T., Siegrist, H., & Joss, A. (2004). Determination of Kd-values for pharmaceuticals and musk fragrances in sewage sludge. Water Research, 38, 4075-4084.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ternes, T., & Joss, A. (2006). Human pharmaceuticals, hormones and fragrances. The challenge of micropollutants in urban water management. London: IWA Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States National Library of Medicine. (2008a). ChemlDplus advanced. From http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus.

  • United States National Library of Medicine. (2008b). Household products database. From www.householdproducts.nlm.nih.gov/index.htm.

  • United States National Library of Medicine. (2008c). Toxicology data network. http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB.

  • Vieno, N. M., Tuhkanen, T., & Kronberg, L. (2005). Seasonal variation in the occurrence of pharmaceuticals in effluents from a sewage treatment plant and in the recipient water. Environmental Science and Technology, 39(21), 8220-8226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S., & Reemtsma, T. (2008). Membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment - a viable option to reduce the amount of polar pollutants discharged into surface waters? Water Research, 42, 3837-3847.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zuehlke, S., Duennbier, U., Lesjean, B., Gnirss, R., & Buisson, H. (2006). Long-term comparison of trace organics removal performances between conventional and membrane activated sludge processes. Water Environment Research, 79(13), 2480-2486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwiener, C., Glauner, T., & Frimmel, F. H. (2000). Biodegradation of pharmaceutical residues investigated by SPE-GC/ITD-MS and on-line derivatization. Hrc - Journal of High Resolution Chromatography, 23(7-8), 474-478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science through the projects MICROFARM (CTQ2007-66265/PPQ) and NOVEDAR_Consolider (CSD2007-00055) and by the Regional Government of Galicia (ESTRAFARM project, PGIDIT08MDS005265PR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Omil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Omil, F., Suárez, S., Carballa, M., Reif, R., Lema, J.M. (2010). Criteria for Designing Sewage Treatment Plants for Enhanced Removal of Organic Micropollutants. In: Fatta-Kassinos, D., Bester, K., Kümmerer, K. (eds) Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle. Environmental Pollution, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3509-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics